- Joined
- Aug 4, 2008
- Messages
- 1,158
- Reaction score
- 1,609
Thanks for the merge of the thread, I still don't have this new thread and merging with old threads down...
I had a question but I don't think it got moved over. In the questioning, (depo) on the CC issue, BC and CA argue relevancy, then BC goes on to argue that it will impede a fair trial for Casey. Wouldn't the fair trial argument be better for BC since the question will most likely be ruled as relevant ?
Anything the A's know about use of their credit cards without authorization by Casey may "hurt" her interests, but it isn't privileged information as to the A's themselves. They don't have a right to claim Casey's 5th amendment privilege. A lot of evidence may tend to incriminate her, but it's only a problem if anyone tries to force Casey A to provide it. It isn't really a legitimate objection coming from BC.