Bobbisangel said:
Why don't they leave those kids right where they are until police are done with their investigation and make a decision whether to press charges against these two losers?
I think it should be mandatory that LE video every single interview or interrogation. That way every word and all body language is taped and there can be no accusations and it will also stop LE from forcing statements of guilt out of people. Best for everyone all the way around.
Hi Bobbisangel - I worked on a lot of child custody cases this summer. I don't know CO laws, but in WI there are time limits in the process. If they're not met or waived, the state loses custody, and kids go back. (It's rare.)
In this case, if it really is about two weeks until police wrap up, then the DA will probably ask for an extension, and the judge would probably like one. But the Thompson's atty will protest, so it really all depends on CO law. If a similar situation would be happening in WI, the kids would not be going back. THe way our process is set up, once the kids are taken away (after an initial finding of good cause by the judge), you have to jump through a good number of hoops to get them back. Usually parenting classes, supervised visitations, then unsupervised, home visits and so on. Even if the kids would be given back, the Thompsons would have to open their home to social workers frequently, sometimes unannounced, and so on.
I second you on the interrogation taping. CO does not have mandatory taping laws in place. However, many judges and attorneys who do non-criminal law find it strange that the criminal side doesn't tape. In civil trials - auto accidents, people suing companies, etc. when people are interviewed and questioned, it's almost ALWAYS taped. When life, liberty and LE reputation is at stake, we don't tape, but when $$ is, we do.