GUILTY CO - Angela Craig, 43, mother of 6, allegedly poisoned by cyanide in protein shake by dentist husband, Aurora, Mar 2023 @2

  • #141
Court was running an hour late -- my guess is something happened before jury instructions-- defense throwing a hissy, caused the Court to strike cameras in the courtroom today so we lost live streaming.

I'm assuming CNN was the pool camera partner who pivoted to the summary currently broadcasting in place of "closing argument" live. JMO
 
  • #142
As far as insurance goes, when there is a stay-at-home parent who is primary caretaker of the children, it is critical to insure the wage earning parent for what his wages would have been if they die before the children reach 18 (or even 22 if the children are destined for college). And, in the case of the stay-at-home parent, who usually has a much lesser ability to get a good job in the case of their spouse's death. So from that point of view, the fact that Angela carried an equal amount of life insurance as BC is suspect in my opinion.

I watched Lauren's (Hidden True Crime) recap of Day 11. I find it totally bizarre that an attorney is putting forth a defense that LE should have investigated BC's claim that he was JUST! honoring his depressed spouse's desire to commit suicide after he had done his best to make her life not worth living. As far as chutzpah goes, this is equivalent to throwing oneself onto the mercy of the court as an orphan after killing one's parents. (IMO)
AC recently stopped working at JC's office to homeschool her younger children and IIRC: it was said during the trial that nothing had been recently changed on either insurance policy.
 
  • #143



Jurors are told: punishment is not your role. Even if they believe guilt is proven, sentencing is the court’s job. Considering it during deliberations is improper and prejudicial.



XI. James Craig Trial — LIST OF CHARGES READ

Craig faces six felony counts, including:

– 1st-degree murder (March 5–21, 2023)

– Solicitation to tamper with evidence (twice)

– Solicitation to commit perjury (twice)

– Solicitation to commit murder (Oct–Nov 2024)



XVIII. James Craig Trial — WITNESS COUNT ≠ TRUTH

The number of witnesses is irrelevant. More people saying something doesn’t make it more true. Jurors must assess substance, not volume.



XX. James Craig Trial — EXPERTS NOT AUTOMATICALLY RIGHT

Expert testimony carries no special weight by default. Jurors can accept or reject expert opinions just like any other witness testimony. It’s up to them.



XXVI. James Craig Trial — REDACTIONS OFF-LIMITS

Jurors are strictly warned: do not speculate about what was redacted from certain exhibits or why it was redacted. The redactions were ordered by the court and cannot be used to draw any inference or assumption.



XXVII. James Craig Trial — STIPULATED FACTS

The parties agreed to certain facts. Jurors are instructed to treat them as proven. Key stipulation: Exhibit 44—a letter—was received at Dr. Craig’s parents’ home shortly after its March 18, 2024 postmark.



XXVIII. James Craig Trial — JUDICIAL NOTICE

The court has taken judicial notice of one fact: Nathaniel Harris has an open probation violation in Denver County (case 23CR6316) and a sentencing hearing set for July 31, 2025. Jurors may accept this fact—but are not required to.



🤬🤬🤬. James Craig Trial — PRIOR DRUGGING INCIDENT

Testimony about a past drugging incident involving Dr. Craig is to be considered solely for motive, knowledge, or intent—not character or guilt by pattern.



XXXIV. James Craig Trial — FIRST-DEGREE MURDER ELEMENTS

1. Dr. Craig

2. In Colorado

3. After deliberation

4. With intent

5. To cause Angela Craig’s death

6. Did cause her death

Each element must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to convict on first-degree murder.



XXXV. James Craig Trial — LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES

If jurors don’t find 1st-degree murder proven, they may consider:

– 2nd-degree murder (knowingly)

– Manslaughter (recklessly)

– Criminally negligent homicide

Each has its own elements. Guilt must be proven for just one—never more than one.



XXXVI. James Craig Trial — JURY VERDICT OPTIONS

If one or more elements of the top charge and all lesser offenses are unproven, the jury must acquit. But they may only convict Craig of one of the four: 1st-degree murder, 2nd-degree, manslaughter, or negligent homicide—not multiple.



XLIII. James Craig Trial — AIDED SUICIDE: MANSLAUGHTER COUNT

Craig also faces a manslaughter charge for allegedly aiding Angela Craig’s suicide. Prosecution must prove he intentionally caused or helped her take her own life. This is a distinct charge from murder.



LVII. James Craig Trial — TIMELINE WRITTEN UNDER PRESSURE

Prosecution points to Exhibit 60: Craig’s “manifesto,” written at 1:03 a.m.—hours after being confronted by business partner Ryan Redfern. Mauro says Craig scrambled to justify what police were about to find: clindamycin, syringes, sealed house.



LVIII. James Craig Trial — FIRST FALSE NARRATIVE: SUICIDE

Mauro: Craig’s first version is that Angela committed suicide—willfully and independently. But that story only surfaces once the evidence starts closing in. “He’s writing excuses before he even knows what’s been found.”



LIX. James Craig Trial — SECOND FALSE NARRATIVE: GAME OF CHICKEN

Next, Craig calls it a “game of chicken.” He says Angela dared him to act. Prosecutor: “He tells this to the Redferns. Then again in a letter to his daughter, Annabelle, asking her to help cover for him—committing a felony in the process.”



LX. James Craig Trial — THIRD FALSE NARRATIVE: SHE SET ME UP

In Exhibit 43, Craig tells William Walden to find fake witnesses. New claim: Angela wanted to set him up during a divorce. He repeats this angle in letters to Casiani Constantinitas—asking her to help prove it.



LXI. James Craig Trial — THREE NARRATIVES, ALL MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE

Mauro: “These can’t all be true. Suicide. Game of chicken. Setup-for-divorce? They contradict each other. None are credible. They only have one thing in common: they shift blame off of James Craig.”



LXII. James Craig Trial — ‘THE FACADE’ THEORY

State says Craig wants jurors to believe everything Angela did—vacations, text messages, sugar checks with a friend—was an act to cover up a suicidal plan. Mauro: “You’d have to believe all that was just a performance.”



LXIII. James Craig Trial — THE ‘CHANGE OF HEART’ TIMELINE

Mauro highlights the absurdity of Craig’s timeline: He allegedly begged Angela not to kill herself… then within 16 hours, started researching poisons. “That’s not a man trying to save his wife. That’s planning.”



LXVIII. James Craig Trial — SPECULATIVE DOUBT IS NOT REASONABLE DOUBT

Mauro tells jurors: “You can't speculate a doubt into existence. ‘What if there’s one more search? One more laptop?’ There’s no witness suggesting Angela had hidden devices. That’s not reason—that’s fiction.”



LXIX. James Craig Trial — COUNT 2: FAKE DEEPFAKE VIDEO

Solicitation to tamper: Craig allegedly asked his daughter to create a fake video of Angela requesting poison. Mauro: “If that were real, he could’ve made the video before she died. But he didn't—because it’s a lie.”



LXXI. James Craig Trial — COUNT 4: PERJURY SCHEME

Exhibit 43: Craig tells William Walbin to recruit “attractive” women to testify Angela was setting him up. Mauro: “He thought if they were beautiful, you’d believe the story. He wanted to sell a fantasy to this jury.”



LXXIV. James Craig Trial — COUNT 6: PERJURY VIA CONSTANTINITES

Craig sent unsolicited letters to Nathaniel Harris’s ex-wife, Cassiani Constantinites, asking her to lie in court. She had no idea who he was. Mauro: “He thanks her for agreeing to help—before she even replied.”



LXXVI. James Craig Trial — 10 DAYS OF POISON = DELIBERATION

Mauro: “This wasn’t a moment of recklessness. He researched, procured, and administered poisons for 10 days. That’s not criminal negligence. That’s intent. That’s deliberation. That’s first-degree murder.”



LXXVII. James Craig Trial — STATE WANTS NOT GUILTY ON COUNT 7

Count 7—manslaughter by aiding suicide—is listed on the verdict form. Mauro: “That’s not what happened. There was no suicide. We’re not asking you to convict him of that. Find him not guilty on Count 7.”



LXXVIII. James Craig Trial — DEFENSE: ‘BROKEN MAN, BROKEN WIFE’

Mauro mocks the defense’s opening: “They said this was about a broken man and broken wife. But then they put on exhibits, cross-exams, and journal entries that show Angela was anything but broken. She was resilient.”



LXXIX. James Craig Trial — ANGELA’S JOURNAL TELLS A DIFFERENT STORY

Angela’s journals show years of betrayal—2009, 2018, 2023—and a woman who kept choosing faith, family, and recovery. Mauro: “She ran emotional ultramarathons. But she couldn’t outrun what happened in that hospital.”



LXXX. James Craig Trial — ANGELA WAS READY TO LEAVE

Angela found out about the affair with Elizabeth Gorth in Dec 2022. She told her sister: “I’m leaving Jim. After Christmas, I’m done.” Mauro: “This wasn’t a woman who couldn’t imagine divorce. She planned for it.”



LXXXII. James Craig Trial — TEXT: ‘DIVORCE WAS A DESPERATE WORD’

Dec 22 text: Craig says, “I’m sorry I said divorce. That was fear and desperation.” Mauro: “He didn’t want a divorce. He wanted Angela to think he did—then pull her back in. Over and over.”



LXXXIII. James Craig Trial — JANUARY = REPEAT PATTERN

Jan 3: Angela finds more lies. Craig admits the DoubleTree charge, but claims he’s not sleeping with Kerry Hegeseth. Texts her: “If Angela calls, back me up.” Mauro: “He’s coaching lies. It’s who he is.”



LXXXIV. James Craig Trial — THE MOST HONEST THING HE SAID

Craig texted Hegeseth: “I’m not happy, but I’m not suicidal. I’m just stuck. I can’t get divorced right now.” Mauro: “That’s the most honest thing he’s said. He felt trapped. So he chose murder.”
 
  • #144
He didn't want to divorce. He wanted to keep cheating. As he had always done. Even with multiple mistresses at the same time. IMO AC was reaching HER threshold. So he killed her before she could divorce him.

JMO
Nothing an abusive, cheating, slime bag hates more than a woman finding her voice...
Just ask Barry--and James, too!
 
  • #145
LXXXVI. James Craig Trial — TEXTS TO KERRY HEGESETH

Craig calls his marriage a “situation,” a “problem.” He describes himself as trapped, helpless, hopeless. Then asks Hegeseth, “Can you help me with my problem?” He offers money. He just wants Angela “gone.”



LXXXVII. James Craig Trial — THE PURGE COMMENT

Mauro says Craig even joked with Hegeseth about The Purge—who he’d kill if given the chance. Angela. And how? “With something untraceable.” State calls it a blueprint disguised as dark humor.



LXXXVIII. James Craig Trial — KAREN CAINE TRIP = TICKING CLOCK

Craig attends a dental conference in Vegas, Feb 22–25. Says in his manifesto: “I had another affair.” She was different—no escort, no secrecy, and wouldn’t sleep with him while he was married. That was the obstacle.



LXXXIX. James Craig Trial — KAREN WAS A DEADLINE

Caine’s trip to Denver was scheduled for March 8. Craig had to act. On Feb 27, just two days after Vegas, he starts searching for poisons. Arsenic ordered. Angela is at home—unaware he’s planning her death.



XC. James Craig Trial — NOT SUICIDE, NOT A PACT

Angela was baking muffins. Craig was researching how to make murder look like a heart attack—not suicide. He wasn’t supporting her plan. He was executing his own. Alone.



XCI. James Craig Trial — THE SEARCH PATTERN TELLS ALL

Craig’s searches escalate:

– Arsenic lethality

– Undetectable poisons

– Murder disguised as heart attack

He’s not googling mental health support or suicide prevention. He’s planning execution.



XCII. James Craig Trial — HE LIES AS HE POISONS

As Angela suffers symptoms, Craig gaslights her: “I know, given our history, that must be triggering. But I didn’t drug you.” State: That line alone shows prior misconduct—and guilty knowledge.



XCIII. James Craig Trial — HIDING HIS DIGITAL TRAIL

Craig avoids his own phone or laptop. Instead, he’s caught in a dark exam room on work computer #9. Why? Because he’s trying to stay off the grid. He’s actively concealing his search history.



XCIV. James Craig Trial — THE OLEANDER ORDER

Craig orders Oleander—never received—but still tracks it obsessively. “Has it shipped? I’m disappointed.” This isn’t someone reluctantly enabling suicide. He’s furious the poison isn’t arriving on time.



XCV. James Craig Trial — THEN COMES CYANIDE

No Oleander? No problem. Craig pivots. He emails and calls suppliers, hoping to find cyanide in stock. He wants to pick it up tomorrow. Mauro: “This isn’t grief. It’s logistics.”



XCVI. James Craig Trial — LATE NIGHT EYEDROPS

Still no cyanide. So at 11 p.m., Craig suddenly buys 12 bottles of tetrahydrozoline eye drops. Defense says it’s bulk buying. State says: “Give me a break.” He’s hunting for whatever poison will work.



James Craig Trial — PROSECUTION SHOWS NO MERCY

"And he's driving to their warehouse, hoping that he can, buy it, at a counter like you would at a Walgreens. He can't buy it there. He's calling, and then his emailing them. He's saying it is an order. Hopefully, this is in stock, and I can pick it up tomorrow on March 9th at night. He doesn't have any Oleander he doesn't have any cyanide. He got the arsenic, but apparently that didn't get the job done. 12 bottles of eye drops, Visine bottles! Now, in the opening, they said, well, you know, Mormons, they like to stock up buy in bulk at 11 p.m.!! He suddenly realizes he needs to go by 12 bottles of eye drops.!! Give me a break! “
 
  • #146
10 minutes ago

'He can't even take the weekend off from trying to murder his wife'​

Madeline Rhodes
Prosecution said he was ‘furiously’ working to secure cyanide and other poisons. They said he sent 12 emails and was calling Midland Scientific for it. He allegedly wanted it overnighted.

“He can’t even take the weekend off from trying to murder his wife,” said the prosecution.

They said he ordered several bottles of eye drops and was seen walking around the kitchen with a syringe.

LIVE TRIAL BLOG
 
  • #147

I'm confused about JC's defense (?) that AC wanted to commit suicide and he provided and prepared the means for her to do so.
Is it not illegal to provide the poisons to someone to kill themselves and especially if you're a doctor?
What he's claiming does not fall under Colorado's "Assisted Suicide" laws so where does he think this could get him with the jury?
Thanks so much cujenn81.
This is what had me baffled if there was no charge.


XLIII. James Craig Trial — AIDED SUICIDE: MANSLAUGHTER COUNT

Craig also faces a manslaughter charge for allegedly aiding Angela Craig’s suicide. Prosecution must prove he intentionally caused or helped her take her own life. This is a distinct charge from murder.
 
  • #148

XCVII. James Craig Trial — THE OLEANDER LIE

Craig gave suppliers fake reasons: “I’m studying oral cancer biopsies.” He begged for ASAP shipping, even asked for a Saturday delivery. Mauro: “He couldn’t even take the weekend off from trying to kill his wife.”



XCVIII. James Craig Trial — RELENTLESS POISON HUNT

Emails Midland Scientific 12+ times. False usage claims: electroplating. Wants cyanide overnighted. Arsenic had failed. Mauro: “He’s not suicidal. He’s not reluctant. He’s furious he can’t get what he needs to finish the job.”



XCIX. James Craig Trial — STOCKPILING EYEDROPS AGAIN

Arsenic didn’t work. Oleander delayed. Cyanide unavailable. So Craig buys seven more bottles of tetrahydrozoline. Same routine as before. Late-night purchases. More deception. Same motive.



CI. James Craig Trial — FOUR OFFICE TRIPS FOR CYANIDE

March 11. Craig makes four trips to his office, desperate to intercept the cyanide shipment. When the door’s locked, he drives to an employee’s home to get a key. Mauro: “He didn’t stop. He escalated.”



CII. James Craig Trial — THE NIGHT ANGELA CRASHED

He waits at the office all day. Cyanide doesn’t arrive. He’s angry. 11:30 p.m., he leaves for Parker Hospital. Thirty minutes later, Angela crashes. In one version, he says the hospital called. In another, he says he was bedside. Both can’t be true.



CIII. James Craig Trial — FALSE TEXTS TO KARIN CAIN

Right after the crash, he texts Karin Cain: “I just love you so much… I can’t believe I’ve lived this long without finding you.” Meanwhile, Angela is dying in the hospital. He's lining up his next life.



CIV. James Craig Trial — THE SYRINGE & THE IV

Craig is caught on surveillance with a syringe. Ten minutes later, he enters Angela’s room. He stays one minute. She flatlines. In his manifesto: “I prepared a potassium cyanide syringe and sealed it in a bag.” Prosecutor: “He executed her.”



CV. James Craig Trial — THE FAKE APARTMENT, THE REAL AFFAIR

Craig tells Karen the apartment isn’t ready. That’s a lie. He admits it later. But after Angela dies, he sleeps with Karen. Mauro: “He didn’t grieve. He celebrated. With her.”



CVI. James Craig Trial — LETTER TO HIS DAUGHTER: DEEPFAKE PLAN

In a letter to Annabel, Craig lays out “Project Memoir.” Code for: make a deepfake video of Angela saying she requested poison. Mauro: “If you need AI to create your innocence, you’re guilty.”



CVIII. James Craig Trial — THE WILLIAM WALDEN LETTER

Craig offers $5,000 per witness plus a $5,000 finder’s fee. Wants attractive women to say Angela set him up. Code names? “Harry Potter” and “Captain America.” It’s Exhibit 43. It’s damning.



CIX. James Craig Trial — STRATEGY: DUPE HIS OWN DEFENSE

He didn’t just want to fool the jury. He wanted fake witnesses to present lies to his own attorney. Wants his investigator fed a third false narrative: Angela was framing him for attempted murder.
 
  • #149



Jurors are told: punishment is not your role. Even if they believe guilt is proven, sentencing is the court’s job. Considering it during deliberations is improper and prejudicial.



XI. James Craig Trial — LIST OF CHARGES READ

Craig faces six felony counts, including:

– 1st-degree murder (March 5–21, 2023)

– Solicitation to tamper with evidence (twice)

– Solicitation to commit perjury (twice)

– Solicitation to commit murder (Oct–Nov 2024)



XVIII. James Craig Trial — WITNESS COUNT ≠ TRUTH

The number of witnesses is irrelevant. More people saying something doesn’t make it more true. Jurors must assess substance, not volume.



XX. James Craig Trial — EXPERTS NOT AUTOMATICALLY RIGHT

Expert testimony carries no special weight by default. Jurors can accept or reject expert opinions just like any other witness testimony. It’s up to them.



XXVI. James Craig Trial — REDACTIONS OFF-LIMITS

Jurors are strictly warned: do not speculate about what was redacted from certain exhibits or why it was redacted. The redactions were ordered by the court and cannot be used to draw any inference or assumption.



XXVII. James Craig Trial — STIPULATED FACTS

The parties agreed to certain facts. Jurors are instructed to treat them as proven. Key stipulation: Exhibit 44—a letter—was received at Dr. Craig’s parents’ home shortly after its March 18, 2024 postmark.



XXVIII. James Craig Trial — JUDICIAL NOTICE

The court has taken judicial notice of one fact: Nathaniel Harris has an open probation violation in Denver County (case 23CR6316) and a sentencing hearing set for July 31, 2025. Jurors may accept this fact—but are not required to.



🤬🤬🤬. James Craig Trial — PRIOR DRUGGING INCIDENT

Testimony about a past drugging incident involving Dr. Craig is to be considered solely for motive, knowledge, or intent—not character or guilt by pattern.



XXXIV. James Craig Trial — FIRST-DEGREE MURDER ELEMENTS

1. Dr. Craig

2. In Colorado

3. After deliberation

4. With intent

5. To cause Angela Craig’s death

6. Did cause her death

Each element must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to convict on first-degree murder.



XXXV. James Craig Trial — LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES

If jurors don’t find 1st-degree murder proven, they may consider:

– 2nd-degree murder (knowingly)

– Manslaughter (recklessly)

– Criminally negligent homicide

Each has its own elements. Guilt must be proven for just one—never more than one.



XXXVI. James Craig Trial — JURY VERDICT OPTIONS

If one or more elements of the top charge and all lesser offenses are unproven, the jury must acquit. But they may only convict Craig of one of the four: 1st-degree murder, 2nd-degree, manslaughter, or negligent homicide—not multiple.



XLIII. James Craig Trial — AIDED SUICIDE: MANSLAUGHTER COUNT

Craig also faces a manslaughter charge for allegedly aiding Angela Craig’s suicide. Prosecution must prove he intentionally caused or helped her take her own life. This is a distinct charge from murder.



LVII. James Craig Trial — TIMELINE WRITTEN UNDER PRESSURE

Prosecution points to Exhibit 60: Craig’s “manifesto,” written at 1:03 a.m.—hours after being confronted by business partner Ryan Redfern. Mauro says Craig scrambled to justify what police were about to find: clindamycin, syringes, sealed house.



LVIII. James Craig Trial — FIRST FALSE NARRATIVE: SUICIDE

Mauro: Craig’s first version is that Angela committed suicide—willfully and independently. But that story only surfaces once the evidence starts closing in. “He’s writing excuses before he even knows what’s been found.”



LIX. James Craig Trial — SECOND FALSE NARRATIVE: GAME OF CHICKEN

Next, Craig calls it a “game of chicken.” He says Angela dared him to act. Prosecutor: “He tells this to the Redferns. Then again in a letter to his daughter, Annabelle, asking her to help cover for him—committing a felony in the process.”



LX. James Craig Trial — THIRD FALSE NARRATIVE: SHE SET ME UP

In Exhibit 43, Craig tells William Walden to find fake witnesses. New claim: Angela wanted to set him up during a divorce. He repeats this angle in letters to Casiani Constantinitas—asking her to help prove it.



LXI. James Craig Trial — THREE NARRATIVES, ALL MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE

Mauro: “These can’t all be true. Suicide. Game of chicken. Setup-for-divorce? They contradict each other. None are credible. They only have one thing in common: they shift blame off of James Craig.”



LXII. James Craig Trial — ‘THE FACADE’ THEORY

State says Craig wants jurors to believe everything Angela did—vacations, text messages, sugar checks with a friend—was an act to cover up a suicidal plan. Mauro: “You’d have to believe all that was just a performance.”



LXIII. James Craig Trial — THE ‘CHANGE OF HEART’ TIMELINE

Mauro highlights the absurdity of Craig’s timeline: He allegedly begged Angela not to kill herself… then within 16 hours, started researching poisons. “That’s not a man trying to save his wife. That’s planning.”



LXVIII. James Craig Trial — SPECULATIVE DOUBT IS NOT REASONABLE DOUBT

Mauro tells jurors: “You can't speculate a doubt into existence. ‘What if there’s one more search? One more laptop?’ There’s no witness suggesting Angela had hidden devices. That’s not reason—that’s fiction.”



LXIX. James Craig Trial — COUNT 2: FAKE DEEPFAKE VIDEO

Solicitation to tamper: Craig allegedly asked his daughter to create a fake video of Angela requesting poison. Mauro: “If that were real, he could’ve made the video before she died. But he didn't—because it’s a lie.”



LXXI. James Craig Trial — COUNT 4: PERJURY SCHEME

Exhibit 43: Craig tells William Walbin to recruit “attractive” women to testify Angela was setting him up. Mauro: “He thought if they were beautiful, you’d believe the story. He wanted to sell a fantasy to this jury.”



LXXIV. James Craig Trial — COUNT 6: PERJURY VIA CONSTANTINITES

Craig sent unsolicited letters to Nathaniel Harris’s ex-wife, Cassiani Constantinites, asking her to lie in court. She had no idea who he was. Mauro: “He thanks her for agreeing to help—before she even replied.”



LXXVI. James Craig Trial — 10 DAYS OF POISON = DELIBERATION

Mauro: “This wasn’t a moment of recklessness. He researched, procured, and administered poisons for 10 days. That’s not criminal negligence. That’s intent. That’s deliberation. That’s first-degree murder.”



LXXVII. James Craig Trial — STATE WANTS NOT GUILTY ON COUNT 7

Count 7—manslaughter by aiding suicide—is listed on the verdict form. Mauro: “That’s not what happened. There was no suicide. We’re not asking you to convict him of that. Find him not guilty on Count 7.”



LXXVIII. James Craig Trial — DEFENSE: ‘BROKEN MAN, BROKEN WIFE’

Mauro mocks the defense’s opening: “They said this was about a broken man and broken wife. But then they put on exhibits, cross-exams, and journal entries that show Angela was anything but broken. She was resilient.”



LXXIX. James Craig Trial — ANGELA’S JOURNAL TELLS A DIFFERENT STORY

Angela’s journals show years of betrayal—2009, 2018, 2023—and a woman who kept choosing faith, family, and recovery. Mauro: “She ran emotional ultramarathons. But she couldn’t outrun what happened in that hospital.”



LXXX. James Craig Trial — ANGELA WAS READY TO LEAVE

Angela found out about the affair with Elizabeth Gorth in Dec 2022. She told her sister: “I’m leaving Jim. After Christmas, I’m done.” Mauro: “This wasn’t a woman who couldn’t imagine divorce. She planned for it.”



LXXXII. James Craig Trial — TEXT: ‘DIVORCE WAS A DESPERATE WORD’

Dec 22 text: Craig says, “I’m sorry I said divorce. That was fear and desperation.” Mauro: “He didn’t want a divorce. He wanted Angela to think he did—then pull her back in. Over and over.”



LXXXIII. James Craig Trial — JANUARY = REPEAT PATTERN

Jan 3: Angela finds more lies. Craig admits the DoubleTree charge, but claims he’s not sleeping with Kerry Hegeseth. Texts her: “If Angela calls, back me up.” Mauro: “He’s coaching lies. It’s who he is.”



LXXXIV. James Craig Trial — THE MOST HONEST THING HE SAID

Craig texted Hegeseth: “I’m not happy, but I’m not suicidal. I’m just stuck. I can’t get divorced right now.” Mauro: “That’s the most honest thing he’s said. He felt trapped. So he chose murder.”
It's a real shame the live stream was canned. Would have loved to have seen and heard this closing. It looks like it was defense who got count 7 -assisted suicide - onto the charge sheet? Was that always there from trial day 1 or added since? Thanks for these updates, not on X these days.
 
  • #150



CXII. James Craig Trial — $20,000 FOR A LIE

In a later letter, Craig raises his offer: $20K per fake witness. He scripts roles for each. All to sell his “Angela set me up” story. Not just false. Not just desperate. Premeditated fabrication.



CXIV. James Craig Trial — FALSE TIMELINE, FALSE FIX

In the manifesto, Craig says the suicide plan began after Vegas. But his January texts to Kerry contradict that. So he tells Cassiani to say Angela approached her back then—trying to backdate the lie.



CXV. James Craig Trial — SMEARING EVERY WITNESS

Craig tries to discredit everyone: Caitlin Romero faked computer searches. Ryan Redfern is “jealous.” Bobby Jo is “corrupt.” Even Nate Monroe, his office manager, gets accused of planting evidence.



CXVI. James Craig Trial — ‘EXHIBIT ANYTHING = LIE’

Mauro: “Pick an exhibit. There’s a good chance it contains a false statement by James Craig.” His letters contradict each other. His manifesto conflicts with his texts. The lies are endless—and sloppy.



CXVII. James Craig Trial — DEFENSE THEORY IS ABSURD

Mauro: “To believe him, you’d have to believe Angela Craig lived a double life. She kept a suicidal pact secret. She faked symptoms. Lied to her sister. Abandoned her kids. And made sure there was zero evidence.”



CXVIII. James Craig Trial — THIS WASN’T ANGELA

The real Angela wasn’t manipulative or suicidal. Witness after witness said she was thoughtful, loving, and planning for her future. She didn’t act recklessly. She didn’t plan her death. She planned a trip to Rhode Island.



CXIX. James Craig Trial — THE ‘LUCKY’ DEFENDANT

Mauro: “To believe this was suicide, you’d have to believe the universe handed Craig the perfect exit—an inexplicably suicidal wife, just as he felt trapped. That’s not luck. That’s fiction.”



CXX. James Craig Trial — 10 DAYS OF ACTION

Craig didn’t hesitate. He didn’t stop. He poisoned Angela over ten full days. He researched. He ordered. He lied. He planted. He schemed. He tried again and again—until it worked.



CXXI. James Craig Trial — FINAL LINE FROM THE STATE

Mauro closes: “Angela Craig was innocent. James Craig is guilty. Find him guilty of murder in the first degree.”

Prosecution’s Closing Arguments ends
 
  • #151
Thanks so much cujenn81.
This is what had me baffled if there was no charge.


XLIII. James Craig Trial — AIDED SUICIDE: MANSLAUGHTER COUNT

Craig also faces a manslaughter charge for allegedly aiding Angela Craig’s suicide. Prosecution must prove he intentionally caused or helped her take her own life. This is a distinct charge from murder.
Prosecution asks the jury in closing to vote not guilty on that assisted suicide charge. Defense must have managed to get it added? Idk when that happened, before trial or just today or yesterday.
 
  • #152
CIV. James Craig Trial — THE SYRINGE & THE IV

Craig is caught on surveillance with a syringe. Ten minutes later, he enters Angela’s room. He stays one minute. She flatlines. In his manifesto: “I prepared a potassium cyanide syringe and sealed it in a bag.” Prosecutor: “He executed her.”
BBM from closing. Jury please do your duty. This is first degree murder. James Craig executed his wife and mother of his six children with no qualms and no remorse.

The added option for assisted suicide (charge 7) makes me see red!! Arrgh, why is it there when the prosecution never sought to prove that at all, period?? When they presented no evidence for it because apart from JC's lying there was none, because it never happened and he was never charged with that. Non comprehendo.

EtA maybe defense got it added because prosecution introduced the fictional manifesto. That might be the downside as it opened the door.
 
Last edited:
  • #153



CXXIII. James Craig Trial — COURT RESUMES

Court is back in session following the brief recess. Jury is present. The defense is now set to begin its closing argument led by Attorney Moses.



CXXIV. James Craig Trial — DEFENSE BEGINS CLOSING

Led by attorney Moses, the defense opens with the word: broken.

“This is a case about broken people, a broken marriage, broken perceptions, and a broken investigation.”

She concedes: the marriage was damaged—but insists there was still love.



CXXV. James Craig Trial — DEFENSE BEGINS

Defense attorney Moses opens with one word: broken.

A broken marriage.

Broken perceptions.

A broken investigation.

Yes, James Craig cheated. Constantly. But cheating doesn’t equal murder.



CXXVI. James Craig Trial — BROKEN, NOT DEADLY

The Craigs were married 23 years. It wasn’t perfect, but there was love.

Moses points to home videos showing warmth, tenderness, and affection.

Yes, infidelity shattered Angela—but that’s not the same as proof of poisoning.



CXXVII. James Craig Trial — MONEY ARGUMENT COLLAPSES

No financial motive, defense says.

The Craigs owned their million-dollar home outright.

No debt collectors, no foreclosure, no signs of financial crisis.



CXXVIII. James Craig Trial — "BAD HUSBAND ≠ MURDERER"

Moses: “You proved he was a crappy husband. A cheater. A liar. But that’s not murder.”

The state proved infidelity, not intent.

Craig’s text messages show dishonesty—but not conspiracy



CXXIX. James Craig Trial — PATTERN, NOT PLAN

Craig sought affirmation from every affair.

Tailored lies for each woman.

No woman was "the one." No promise to flee.

A serial cheater, yes. A scheming killer, no



CXXX. James Craig Trial — JOURNAL OF A BROKEN WIFE

Angela’s journal shows deep hurt going back to 2008.

“I feel abused, worthless, unwanted.”

By 2018: “It’s almost killed me. He said he didn’t love me.”

Painful words—but they stop short of suicidal ideation



CXXXI. James Craig Trial — DECEMBER TO MARCH GAP

Defense points out what’s missing:

No journal entries from December 2022 to March 2023.

The key period. The time she was allegedly planning suicide or being poisoned.

Her silence cuts both ways.



CXXXII. James Craig Trial — UTAH TRIP & MARRIAGE GAMES

Angela uncovered the Montana affair.

Texted Craig: “Don’t come home. I hope she was worth it.”

But then… she let him back.

Defense says that’s not manipulation—it’s the cycle of betrayal and return.



CXXXIII. James Craig Trial — SHE KEPT SECRETS, TOO

Angela didn’t tell friends how bad it was.

She distanced herself from Mickey Harmon and Michelle Renferd.

Even her sister Toni only got vague texts: “I’m feeling broken… I’m staying.”

Private pain is not a murder plot.
 
  • #154



CXXXIV. James Craig Trial — DEFENSE ON MARCH TIMELINE

Moses turns to March. “This is an interesting argument.”

She points out major gaps in the video evidence — large chunks of time missing. Yet the prosecution draws conclusions from it anyway.



CXXXV. James Craig Trial — URGENT CARE CONTEXT

On the day in question, Angela had gone to urgent care.

Her daughter, Annabelle Craig, testified that she, not James, took Angela there.

The defense argues: he wasn’t present — but now the state says he's to blame for not attending?



CXXXVI. James Craig Trial — MORE ON ‘BROKEN’

The word broken resurfaces in the video.

Defense urges jurors to see this not as manipulation, but as a reflection of a devastated relationship dynamic.

“We heard it from Angela. We heard it from James. They were both broken.”



CXXXVII. James Craig Trial — MANIPULATIVE? OR SPOUSAL GUILT?

Moses revisits Annabelle Craig’s testimony on the word manipulative.

She suggests the prosecution’s reading of it is one-sided.

“Is this really manipulation? Or spousal guilt? A reaction to emotional neglect?”



CXXXVIII. James Craig Trial — MISSING VIDEO TIME

Defense presses a key point:

There are significant skips, long pauses, and cut segments in the March video.

“We’re missing up to 12 minutes. We can’t speculate — but the state does. That’s not proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”
 
  • #155
Prosecution asks the jury in closing to vote not guilty on that assisted suicide charge. Defense must have managed to get it added? Idk when that happened, before trial or just today or yesterday.
If the prosecution doesn't want the jury to vote guilty on it the only thing I can think of is they're now afraid the jury could find him guilty of that and not a higher charge with longer sentencing?
It also plays into JC's convoluted claims that it was AC who wanted to and did finally kill herself?
Purely guessing.


The "assisted suicide" charge was one of his original charges and not one of the 2 charges that were added after JC's attorney was allowed to be removed from defending him.

 
  • #156
I can't believe I'm bothering to respond to it because it's ludicrous, but if AC was suicidal and chose a slow, painful, miserable death by suicide, why would she go to the hospital?

He makes me so angry.

She deserved so much better.

JMO
 
  • #157
If the prosecution doesn't want the jury to vote guilty on it the only thing I can think of is they're now afraid the jury could find him guilty of that and not a higher charge with longer sentencing?
It also plays into JC's convoluted claims that it was AC who wanted to and did finally kill herself?
Purely guessing.


The "assisted suicide" charge was one of his original charges and not one of the 2 charges that were added after JC's attorney was allowed to be removed from defending him.

Thankyou! The assisted suicide count isn't referenced at all in that report. It's a bit confusing but I happened to just check the docket (linked below) and it definately isn't an original charge. I'm thinking it must have been added since the start of trial at the behest of the defense, perhaps even just yesterday during the charging/ jury instructions discussions.

From what I can understand of the updates above from pros closing, it's a separate count to murder 1 and lessers ie it stands alone. The prosecution did not at any time ask for that separate count imo. It has gotta have been the defense. But hopefully some reporter will eventually fill us in! Jmo


 
  • #158
Chris Cuomo interview a week after AC was murdered.
He's a reporter who was also a patient of JC.

@ 1:53 Cuomo shows a copy of the dental advertisement JC had taken out.
I don't know if it had been posted 2 yrs ago and I find it creepy and damn frightening listening to him talk now knowing what he was all about even then,

Just like listening to the business interview R. Heuermann gave.


Scream!

 
  • #159
Thankyou! The assisted suicide isn't referenced at all in that report. It's a bit confusing but I happened to just check the docket (linked below) and it definately isn't an original charge. I'm thinking it must have been added since the start of trial at the behest of the defense, perhaps even just yesterday during the charging/ jury instructions discussions.

From what I can understand of the updates above from pros closing, it's a separate count to murder 1 and lessers ie it stands alone. The prosecution did not at any time ask for that separate count imo. It has gotta have been the defense. But hopefully some reporter will eventually fill us in! Jmo


23CR664 DA-90 Amended Complaint and Information.pdf (PDF, 119.62 KB)
Thank you for the info.
It is the perfect charge for the defense w/o even knowing the sentence guideline.
Must be a hellava lot less than 1st degree murder and it remains available to the jury.
 
  • #160



CXXXIX. James Craig Trial — BROKEN PERCEPTION

“There’s so much missing,” Moses says. The jury cannot speculate about missing minutes. But what they can do is examine how perception got twisted. “Broken marriage. Broken lens. Broken investigation.”



CXL. James Craig Trial — DOTING, THEN REWRITTEN

Nurses testified James was kind, attentive. Present.

But the state now pushes a rewritten version — that he was cold, absent.

Moses hits back: “Go to the texts. Mark Pray said he was starving, sent a silly emoji. That’s not a man angry at Craig for being gone.”



CXLI. James Craig Trial — SHARP LENSES

Moses says the case became fixated after March 15.

Police honed in, “blinders on,” ignoring any alternative possibility.

“They saw a syringe in a blurry video. But there’s no poison, no substance. Just a drawer of meds — routine meds requiring syringes.”



CXLII. James Craig Trial — NO SHARP CONTAINER TESTED

They pointed to a sharps container down a hospital hall.

“But every hospital room has one,” Moses says.

Police never tested it. Labs wouldn’t go through it.



CXLIII. James Craig Trial — BROKEN INVESTIGATION

“Watch the video. Look at Craig in that chair. You can feel the anxiety.”

Moses stresses that police were looking through a distorted lens.

“They never wanted to see nuance. Just a story that fit the charges.”



CXLIV. James Craig Trial — LENSES & PRESUMPTIONS

Dr. Lear testified about manner of death. Homicide.

But Moses reminds the jury: she relied solely on police materials.

“No mental health records. No full picture. Just blinders and bias.”



CXLV. James Craig Trial — A PRIVATE CYCLE

Moses turns to the Redfern call.

Craig didn’t give the whole truth — but “how do you explain 23 years of dysfunction to someone when your wife is private and ashamed?”

She calls it a game of chicken: “I’ll leave, no I’ll stay. I love you, I hate you.”



CXLVI. James Craig Trial — WHAT HAPPENED ON MARCH 15?

Craig leaves early. Angela becomes sick late morning, crashes at 2 PM.

If Craig did poison her, why would he call attention to it?

He tells others: “She says her arm hurts.”

Moses: “That’s not the behavior of a killer.”



CXLVII. James Craig Trial — DOCTORS SAW NO RED FLAGS

Moses calls out the reaction of staff:

“No doctor, no nurse, no family member found his demeanor off.”

Even after learning she was brain-dead, one doctor called him bitter.

Bitter? Maybe — at Angela. Maybe at the whole situation.



CXLVIII. James Craig Trial — FORENSICS IGNORED

Investigators didn’t wait for the forensic team to process computer #9.

“They rushed. They skipped steps. They grabbed what fit the story.”

Yet they waited to extract the cell phones. Moses asks: “Why the inconsistency?”



CXLIX. James Craig Trial — PICK & CHOOSE

Moses slams the state’s cherry-picking.

“They want you to believe Craig’s messages to Kerry Hegeseth, but ignore what he said to Karen Kane. Believe this letter, not that one.

You can’t pick and choose guilt like a buffet.”



CL. James Craig Trial — YOU DON’T GET TO GUESS

“They don’t get to pick and choose based on blinders,” Moses says.

Investigators took photos of pills on the nightstand—but didn’t test them.

“You think she was poisoned? Then why leave it? Why not collect it?”



CLI. James Craig Trial — THE CAPSULE THEORY

State wants you to believe he tampered with capsules, perfectly resealed them, and nobody noticed.

“Cyanide that leaves no trace? No mess? No spill?”

Moses: “That’s fantasy, not fact. No cyanide was found.”



CLII. James Craig Trial — THE CUPBOARD

Jurors are reminded of the kitchen scene:

No assigned cups. No warnings. Everyone grabs freely.

“No evidence she was targeted with tetrahydrozoline,” Moses says.

“You don’t know who poured that drink—and you don’t get to guess.”



CLIII. James Craig Trial — THE MISSING URGENT CARE LINK

Angela went to Urgent Care. But prosecutors never followed up.

Moses: “No records. No explanation. You think it’s important? Then prove it.

They didn’t. And you can’t speculate.”



CLIV. James Craig Trial — NOT A SIMPLE CASE

The marriage was messy.

“This wasn’t a man greedy for a house. This was a man who ran back to her after Montana.

It’s not about being a good husband. It’s about proof.”



CLV. James Craig Trial — SYMPATHY ≠ GUILT

“This case isn’t about whether you like James Craig,” Moses says.

“Or whether you sympathize with the family. This is about evidence. Not emotion.”

She warns the jury: don’t confuse tragedy with certainty.



CLVI. James Craig Trial — DESPERATE ≠ GUILTY

Yes, he wrote that letter to his daughter. Yes, it’s heartbreaking.

But Moses tells the jury: “That is not an admission. That is the act of a scared, desperate, innocent man.”



CLVII. James Craig Trial — HARRIS IS NOT CREDIBLE

“They want you to trust Nathaniel Harris. But would you buy a car from him?”

Moses tears into his reliability: “This is a man who causes fear and desperation, not truth beyond reasonable doubt.”



CLVIII. James Craig Trial — THE BURDEN

Presumption of innocence never left the defense table.

“They accused. They must prove.”

Not vague. Not speculative.

“A doubt that would make you hesitate in matters of personal importance.”



CLIX. James Craig Trial — WHAT IT TAKES TO CONVICT

“You don’t get to leap. You don’t get to fill in blanks.”

The law requires certainty—not strong hunches, not bias, not hindsight.

“If you hesitate, that’s reasonable doubt.”



CLX. James Craig Trial — THE FINAL PLEA

Moses ends:

“You’ve heard them talk. Now take off the blinders. Look at what they gave you—and what they didn’t.

On behalf of James Craig, we ask you to find him not guilty.”

Defense ends Closing Arguments



CLXI. James Craig Trial — PROSECUTION REBUTTAL

Brackley: “James Craig deserves a fair trial.

He got one.

Now he deserves a guilty verdict. Because he is guilty.”



CLXII. James Craig Trial — FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

“We’ve never asked you to shift the burden,” Brackley says.

“We just ask you to follow the evidence that’s believable, credible, and reasonable.

If you do that—you’ll find James Craig guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”



CLXIII. James Craig Trial — THE CHARGES

Brackley barely touches the lesser-included offenses.

“He’s not guilty of second-degree murder or manslaughter,” he says.

“He’s guilty of first-degree murder. Why? Because this was intentional.

This was deliberate.”



CLXIV. James Craig Trial — ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE

Brackley tells the jury: “I’m going to put it squarely on this one piece of evidence…”



CLXV. James Craig Trial — “DOZENS OF PIECES OF EVIDENCE”

Brackley: “We’re here not because of what we want to prove.

We’re here because of what he did.”

Craig researched how to poison, where to buy it, and how much to use.

Nobody wants to believe this was simple. But his actions are undeniable.



CLXVI. James Craig Trial — “THE POLICE DID THEIR JOB”

Brackley defends the investigation.

“You heard from Detective Harris, Olson, Ward.

They looked, they returned, they photographed everything.

If something’s missing, it’s because he went home and removed it.

The manifesto even admits it.”



CLXVII. James Craig Trial — “NO SUICIDE EVIDENCE”

Brackley: “There is no evidence Angela Craig was suicidal.

Every mention of suicide came from him.

The letters? The manifesto? All written by James Craig.

There is no outside evidence of Angela wanting to die.”



CLXVIII. James Craig Trial — “TEXTS DON’T LIE”

Angela spent the final 10 days of her life texting her family,

asking for help, and trying to understand why she was sick—

with him, the man poisoning her.

That’s not suicide.

That’s murder.



CLXIX. James Craig Trial — “IF YOU BELIEVE HIM…”

“To buy this suicide theory, you have to believe the man

who wrote fake letters,

gave fake instructions,

planted fake evidence,

and told his jailmate how to manipulate the narrative.”

Brackley: “You don’t have to believe him. And you shouldn’t.”



CLXX. James Craig Trial — “THE MANIFESTO TIMELINE”

While Angela lay dying in the ICU,

Craig wrote a manifesto blaming her for her own death.

He wasn’t grieving. He was covering.

By 12:05 AM, his mistress texted:

“Well, I guess it’s good you weren’t home. No one will suspect you.”



CLXXI. James Craig Trial — “REACTIONS OF A MURDERER”

His actions weren’t simple.

But they were calculated.

Brackley: “While she died, he typed. While she weakened, he schemed.

That’s not a grieving husband.

That’s a murderer.”
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
111
Guests online
1,266
Total visitors
1,377

Forum statistics

Threads
632,316
Messages
18,624,599
Members
243,083
Latest member
100summers
Back
Top