Found Deceased CO - BARRY ARRESTED AGAIN - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w/o prejudice* *found in 2023* #117

^^rsbm

No worries.

It appears that the 12th Judicial District also keeps an open bench for a "visiting judge" to supplement four district court judges.

We know that Judge Patrick Murphy retired on 12/31/24 but is doing legal research for the Court. I doubt SD is still being represented by IE's umbrella of legal friends who would force a 'borrowed' Murphy to opt-out and/or recuse himself if asked to hear this case.

Grinds my gears that Murphy fell for that and pulled out of the Morphew case instead of the Darke one.
 
Thank you for providing the statues relating to the issue at the state level. I would like to see similar with respect to appropriate venue choice from among judicial districts within the state.

As I understand the thinking in general, the presumption that murder occurs in the jurisdiction where the remains are found is high, EXCEPT where circumstantial evidence strongly points to the murder occurring in another jurisdiction. I think it unlikely we are going to hear from BM or his attorneys suggesting that the murder occurred in Chaffee County so the case should be tried there, UNLESS they plan to resort to the SODDI defense along with the idea that the abductor/murderer attempted to frame BM using BAM (a substance not widely available). And in that case, the defense team would have to have some solid evidence pointing to a specific SOD who DI.

I could generally see an alternate venue being assigned when the defendant moves for such and is able to provide adequate reasoning to support that move to protect the defendant's rights (some kind of conflict or bias in the original venue, excessive media attention impacting a jury pool, etc), but it seems odd to me that the law would permit the state to use the "presumption of murder where body found" principle to "venue shop" so they could select a venue where prosecutions tend to be more successful (perhaps indicating judges or juries are more prosecution-friendly there, or the district attorney's office is more generously funded or more competently staffed, or less subject to serious internal disputes within the district attorney's office).

Don't get me wrong; I want to see BM convicted and imprisoned. And I also wouldn't mind seeing if judges in Alamosa County are superior to those we've already observed in Chaffee County - who left much to be desired IMO. I just don't want venue selection to be an issue driving successful appeal of a guilty verdict. When that iron door slams shut, I want it to stay shut.
Here's an article that generally addresses the issue: How Colorado Courts Handle Multi-County Criminal Cases. But in terms of specific statutes and rules, I am not sure there is an easily accessible, definitive set. The article stresses the complexity of the decision and the importance of communication and working relationships among jurisdictions as the key to avoiding adverse outcomes.

Under existing principles of jurisdiction as I understand them, it is sufficient for legal purposes that part of the criminal conduct occurred in the 12th Judicial District. Subject matter jurisdiction is solid because a part of the criminal episode clearly was committed there. Since Morphew is no longer a resident of Colorado, the allegation that he disposed of his wife's body in the District is sufficient to give courts there personal jurisdiction over him. I doubt that he will contest jurisdiction in the 11th JD.

Venue is another matter. If Morphew can present evidence that he cannot receive a fair trial in Alamosa, he can argue for a change of venue within the district or to a larger metropolitan area in Colorado. He did this successfully in Salida.

Even so, it should take evidence of a pervasive community prejudice against him to justify a change of courts before the jury selection process is complete. Most judges prefer to assemble a larger than normal jury pool and assess the impartiality of each juror during voir dire. I disagreed with Judge Lama's decision to transfer venue within the 11th JD because although a few people testified, evidence of pervasive prejudice in the community was lacking.

I have no doubt that conversations were held between and among representatives of the 12th and 11th JDs - and probably the state AG's appellate unit, as to which district would be most appropriate. I think the civil lawsuit Morphew brought against 11th JD officials, the issues the pending case could present for the credibility of the case, and the lingering controversy over the DA there was a serious consideration.

Sorry I can't come up with a more definitive and satisfying answer, and even the above response could be wrong!
 
Felony Friday just gave way to Monumental Monday -- BK pleading to guilty, four life sentences, and BM, returned to Colorado, to face his fate.

I'm good if BM wants to plead guilty, too but no mercy for sentencing, no reductions. He chose this, and he didn't have to.

LWOP, nothing less.

JMO
 
Felony Friday just gave way to Monumental Monday -- BK pleading to guilty, four life sentences, and BM, returned to Colorado, to face his fate.

I'm good if BM wants to plead guilty, too but no mercy for sentencing, no reductions. He chose this, and he didn't have to.

LWOP, nothing less.

JMO
And the bonus is Brooks Houck is sitting in jail minus his skid steer and likely looking at a very long sentence too! Winning but not for the victim’s families. God Bless them all.
 
Here's an article that generally addresses the issue: How Colorado Courts Handle Multi-County Criminal Cases. But in terms of specific statutes and rules, I am not sure there is an easily accessible, definitive set. The article stresses the complexity of the decision and the importance of communication and working relationships among jurisdictions as the key to avoiding adverse outcomes.

Under existing principles of jurisdiction as I understand them, it is sufficient for legal purposes that part of the criminal conduct occurred in the 12th Judicial District. Subject matter jurisdiction is solid because a part of the criminal episode clearly was committed there. Since Morphew is no longer a resident of Colorado, the allegation that he disposed of his wife's body in the District is sufficient to give courts there personal jurisdiction over him. I doubt that he will contest jurisdiction in the 11th JD.

Venue is another matter. If Morphew can present evidence that he cannot receive a fair trial in Alamosa, he can argue for a change of venue within the district or to a larger metropolitan area in Colorado. He did this successfully in Salida.

Even so, it should take evidence of a pervasive community prejudice against him to justify a change of courts before the jury selection process is complete. Most judges prefer to assemble a larger than normal jury pool and assess the impartiality of each juror during voir dire. I disagreed with Judge Lama's decision to transfer venue within the 11th JD because although a few people testified, evidence of pervasive prejudice in the community was lacking.

I have no doubt that conversations were held between and among representatives of the 12th and 11th JDs - and probably the state AG's appellate unit, as to which district would be most appropriate. I think the civil lawsuit Morphew brought against 11th JD officials, the issues the pending case could present for the credibility of the case, and the lingering controversy over the DA there was a serious consideration.

Sorry I can't come up with a more definitive and satisfying answer, and even the above response could be wrong!
I very much appreciate your response.
 
Murder Charges in CO & Place of Trial?

@Diddian From section of CO. criminal code,

"18-1-202. Place of trial - applicability.
"(1) Except as otherwise provided by law, criminal actions shall be tried in the county where the offense was committed, or in any other county where an act in furtherance of the offense occurred.....
"(3) In a case involving the death of a person, the offense is committed and the offender may be tried in any county in which the cause of death is inflicted, or in which death occurs, or in which the body of the deceased or any part of such body is found."
^ from page 6 of pdf (w bbm sbm)
Or see:

 
Can't see BM taking a plea, very different personality type than BK. I think maybe BK's family talked him into it, but I can't see BM agreeing to it even for his family.
BM has his family snowed and in Colorado there is no death penalty serving as any kind of leverage. I doubt his family would want him to even consider a plea deal.
 
Chapter 38, Rule 3 of the Colorado Supreme Court Rules provides the standards for
authorizing expanded media coverage.

Under Rule 3 - live/expanded media coverage in criminal court (by a shared pool camera) may only be considered for advisements and arraignments.

Specific to this case, paragraph 11 of the June 20, 2025 Order by the Court Pre-emptively granting expanded media coverage, extended the court proceedings for EMC consideration to include the following:

11. The only portions of the proceedings that may be audio/video recorded are: bond
hearings, preliminary hearing, arraignment, pre-trial conferences, motions hearings,
opening statements, closing statements, reading of the verdict, sentencing (except
for any victim impact statements), or post-conviction hearings. There shall be no
recordings of any bench conferences, in camera proceedings, communications
between the defendant and counsel, or communications between co-counsel for any

party.

While paragraph 11 of the Order does not specifically state "advisements," I'm going on the assumption that Tuesday's advisement hearing at 1:30 PM will be covered and streamed pursuant to Chapter 38, Rule 3.

Paragraphs 2 & 3 from the Order are also provided below for convenience:


2. No more than five credentialed members of the media shall be allowed in the
courtroom on any given day. They shall be confined to the backmost right row of the
courtroom.

3. One member of the media will be allowed to record the proceedings with an
agreement to share that video and audio with all other media outlets who request it.
Any member of the media unwilling to share its video or audio with any other
credentialed member of the media will not be permitted to record. Members of the
media are solely responsible for making all pooling arrangements.



CHAPTER 38, RULE 3- EMC
 
Felony Friday just gave way to Monumental Monday -- BK pleading to guilty, four life sentences, and BM, returned to Colorado, to face his fate.

I'm good if BM wants to plead guilty, too but no mercy for sentencing, no reductions. He chose this, and he didn't have to.

LWOP, nothing less.

JMO
Barry is almost 60 in my eyes ( 58 ish). If they offer him 20 or 25 to plead w/no chance of parole to spare the girls a trial /having to have their lives disrupted /become sister wives again - why not? He would be 80 or so.
If he lives that long.
He really is a wimp. Not a tough guy at all
A hang nail makes him dizzy
Prison for him -
Delicious. 😋
JMO
 

6/30/25

Notice from DA Anne Kelley:

Anne E. Kelly, Twelfth Judicial District Attorney has announced that Barry Morphew has been extradited back to Colorado from Arizona, and is now in custody at the Alamosa County Jail.

He is scheduled to make his first appearance in court at 1:30 p.m. on July 1, 2025. It has been confirmed that the hearing will be available by livestream here. Select Alamosa Courtroom C.
 
Ha never .....


well then again didn't really think BK would either. But he was facing DP I guess....
IMO death penalty so much easier. If I am in that situation ( which will never happen) I would ask to jump the line. Shoot me after the verdict.
kohlberger must like it inside. Lots of structure.
And meds.
JMO
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
175
Guests online
633
Total visitors
808

Forum statistics

Threads
626,761
Messages
18,533,180
Members
241,119
Latest member
SteveH
Back
Top