Defense objects to witness' describing detailed vs. vague information provided by individuals (in general) who are asked to complete an FBI form called a "Free Narrative," a written statement of circumstances surrounding the disappearance/case at hand.
What witness is getting ready to say, in looking into my crystal ball, is that when a subject provides vague information when completing the form, he may be trying to hide or minimize details that may be important to the case (and/or implicate the subject). [IMO]
[Defense does NOT want witness to go there with respect to defendant!]
The Free Narrative form allows for:
1. Giving the "subject" a chance to provide information without being interrupted, as would happen with a verbal interview.
2. Allows LE to assess how the information provided by the subject aligns with what LE believes to be the facts of the case.
3. Seeks to establish an accurate timeline of events surrounding the disappearance.
Took MR 20 minutes to complete the written information he provided on the form.
MR completed the Free Narrative form on 11/26/2012, when the FBI witness (testifying now) visited MR at his home at approximately 11:30 a.m., with three other LE individuals. MR did not know, ahead of time, that they were coming. They knocked on his door and explained why they were there; he let them in, and agreed to cooperate.
The form that MR completed is offered into evidence for the jury's perusal.
Good time for break. (Now comes Miller time!)
At least this witness examination is not a total snooze fest.
[apologies for the disjointed summary]
[all of the above is IMO!]
