CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #12

[PaulR]

Because it took him five hours to check on him?

Cite?

 

[Kamille]

one might text anyway, so that if LE looked at their cell history, they would look innocent.

Speaking of looking at MR's cell history, I wonder if his phone was on and pinging the whole time. When did he take time out to charge it if that was the case? Or is he one of those people who only turn the phone on when he wants to use it?

Then again I suppose as it has been mentioned earlier, there would be a broad range of area around any pings in the vicinity of the Durango to Vallecito route due to limited cell towers?

 

[mmmagique]

(1) They gave the mother a lie detector test too.
(2) Of course they searched his house, that's where Dylan was last seen. That's good police work. If your child went missing and the last place they were seen was your home, LE would search your house too even if they had proof you had nothing to do with it.
(3) Again, with searching the cars, good police work. Even if they think MR innocent they have to do this to clear him, otherwise a good defense attorney will rip LE to shreds.
(4) Can you cite where you read about an extended/"intensive" interview? All I've heard about was the polygraph which they gave to the mother too.

"Mark Redwine also agreed to give an official interview to the task force for the case – made up of agents from the La Plata County Sheriff’s Office, Durango Police Department, Bayfield Marshal’s Office, FBI and Colorado Bureau of Investigation – after investigators asked if he would be willing to do an in-depth interview, said Lt. Ray Shupe, spokesman for the task force.

Redwine has given several cursory interviews in the past, but this was the first in-depth interview he has given, Shupe said."

http://durangoherald.com/article/20...96/0/SEARCH/Investigators-end-search-of-house

 

[katydid23]

Cite?

It has been linked and posted here many times. Dad himself says that he went to the friends and began asking about Dylan at around 4 pm.

 

[Bravo]

The only scenario i can think of Dylan was abducted and is being kept. As horrible as that would be it's the best outcome i got. He would be alive. And found.

 

[PaulR]

"Mark Redwine also agreed to give an official interview to the task force for the case – made up of agents from the La Plata County Sheriff’s Office, Durango Police Department, Bayfield Marshal’s Office, FBI and Colorado Bureau of Investigation – after investigators asked if he would be willing to do an in-depth interview, said Lt. Ray Shupe, spokesman for the task force.

Redwine has given several cursory interviews in the past, but this was the first in-depth interview he has given, Shupe said."

http://durangoherald.com/article/20...96/0/SEARCH/Investigators-end-search-of-house

Thanks.

I would not think a guilty person would give an in-depth interview to the FBI, CBI, and local police, especially without an attorney present:

No attorney was present for the interview, and Shupe said Redwine has not retained an attorney.

 

[katydid23]

Speaking of looking at MR's cell history, I wonder if his phone was on and pinging the whole time. When did he take time out to charge it if that was the case? Or is he one of those people who only turn the phone on when he wants to use it?

Then again I suppose as it has been mentioned earlier, there would be a broad range of area around any pings in the vicinity of the Durango to Vallecito route due to limited cell towers?

I think that is one of the main problems here. There are very few cell towers, so they cannot pinpoint where anyones' cell was when, imo.

 

[PaulR]

It has been linked and posted here many times. Dad himself says that he went to the friends and began asking about Dylan at around 4 pm.

http://www.denverpost.com/recommended/ci_22108222

Mark said he tried texting Dylan all afternoon in an area with spotty cellphone service. When he didn't hear anything back by late afternoon, he went to Dylan's friend's house in Vallecito. That friend hadn't seen him.

 

[mmmagique]

Cite?

He came home at 11:30, and didn't go to his friend's house until 4 or 4:30, can't remember which. He didn't text ER until 4:30, either.

 

[katydid23]

Thanks.

I would not think a guilty person would give an in-depth interview to the FBI, CBI, and local police, especially without an attorney present:

Unless that person was the parent and the last person to see the victim. Because in that case the person might feel it more suspicious NOT to give that interview.

 

[cattlekate]

Remember that LE is under some obligation to give the public updates but they are under no obligation to tell us everything they have. And they don't...ever. They pick and choose what they release and they do it very carefully.

Which is why I am truly puzzled as to why the Walmart security cam footage was not shown, much less acknowledged, for two weeks. It clearly proved MR was telling the truth about stopping at Walmart.

 

[katydid23]

http://www.denverpost.com/recommended/ci_22108222

EXACTLY. He sat home and texted his missing son a few times. Then finally at around 4 o clock he went out looking for him. AFTER 5 HOURS of not knowing where he was or if he was safe or not.

 

[mmmagique]

Thanks.

I would not think a guilty person would give an in-depth interview to the FBI, CBI, and local police, especially without an attorney present:

It would be pretty to think so. Many guilty people think they are smarter than LE, and can out think any interviewer. Many guilty people also believe they would "look" guilty were they to lawyer up.

 

[katydid23]

When your 13 yr old is not where they are supposed to be, and is not accounted for, I don't think that texting them for 5 hours is a very pro-active way to find them. JMO

 

[mmmagique]

http://www.denverpost.com/recommended/ci_22108222

Texting a child may be ok for half an hour or so, but after that, you best get your buns out the door and looking for your (missing) child.

 

[PaulR]

Unless that person was the parent and the last person to see the victim. Because in that case the person might feel it more suspicious NOT to give that interview.

OK, I just want to understand.

Mark is asked to give an interview with a number of LE agencies.
What can Mark do?
(a) Decline - suspicious, and so he's probably guilty
(b) Says yes but only with attorney present - suspicious and so he's probably guilty
(c) Says yes and declines right of having attorney present - also evidence of guilt because doing anything else would be evidence of guilt

I'm not picking on you, but it seems that no matter how MR could have responded, people would have interpreted his actions as indicative of guilt.

And frankly MR does not strike me as the type to be able to outsmart a large number of LE officials at an interview.

 

[LotusPawprint]

Thanks.

I would not think a guilty person would give an in-depth interview to the FBI, CBI, and local police, especially without an attorney present:

Or someone who thinks he's pretty clever and thinks his story sounds pretty good.

The latter is working around here a bit. Just sayin.

 

[dlc]

Thanks.

I would not think a guilty person would give an in-depth interview to the FBI, CBI, and local police, especially without an attorney present:

Paul - you could be right -- though I don't think that he had many options in terms of the interview (meaning it wasn't really a _choice_). As to lack of an attorney, I could think of many reasons why he might have thought it was a good idea - not in my book, but his.

Thanks for responding to my post.

 

[jjenny]

There is a whole bunch of cases with missing children, where caretakers of these children don't seem particularly smart. And yet they appear to be able to outsmart law enforcement.

 

[mmmagique]

OK, I just want to understand.

Mark is asked to give an interview with a number of LE agencies.
What can Mark do?
(a) Decline - suspicious, and so he's probably guilty
(b) Says yes but only with attorney present - suspicious and so he's probably guilty
(c) Says yes and declines right of having attorney present - also evidence of guilt because doing anything else would be evidence of guilt

I'm not picking on you, but it seems that no matter how MR could have responded, people would have interpreted his actions as indicative of guilt.

And frankly MR does not strike me as the type to be able to outsmart a large number of LE officials at an interview.

Me either. He does, however, strike me as the type to believe he can.

As to your other queries, he is not being suspected due to one action or even two, but a culmination of many things he has done and said. And also, because as he said, he's the last person to see his son before he disappeared.