I added the links for the claims I've made recently about the LE lake search in November to the Search thread. Copying them here.
Specific claims I've made are:
- LE searched east end of lake
- LE searched south end of lake
- 7 divers
- 3/4 boats with 3/4 sonar systems
- LE searched an area 20 times the size of where the dogs hit
Here are quotes and links:
The La Plata County Sheriff's Office says they've searched the east side of the lake with divers and sonar in the past and weren't able to find anything.
http://www.kob.com/article/stories/S2946344.shtml?cat=504
Seven New Mexico State Police scuba divers used three different boats with four different sonar systems to sweep the southern end of Vallecito Lake Monday.
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...lorado-teen-dylan-redwine-planned-for-tuesday
BENDER: We`re still searching in the area, the Vallecito area. However, it`s a very large lake. It takes 12 miles to drive around the entire lake. And we were searching, the reason we brought up the divers and the sonar and such is because of the dog alerts in a very small area. Our search by the divers and sonar actually covered an area probably 20 times the (INAUDIBLE) where the dogs alerted and there was simply nothing found there.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1211/28/ng.01.html
I understand all of that. And, I thank you for bringing forward the statements and such again as well.
The thing is that back in November the divers could only go down 40 feet into a lake that is 167 feet deep over by the dam. They only had visibility of 8-10 feet under the water. They could not go all the way down to the bottom - which is where anything would have been at that time. How well would sonar work with a bottom that is full of debris vs. a "flat" bottom lake. There is a forest of stumps at the bottom of this lake. (I'm only used to seeing the sonar pictures of the sort that were in your linked .pdf, so I don't know how a backpack, or a body would show up vs. a tree stump and brush.)
I am not questioning NM divers or their team. I'm only pointing out the obvious difficulties involved in searching this specific lake - with the altitude, the water depth, and the temperatures of the water.
Here's the question I'm left with to LE - divers, or anyone else involved in searching the lake... We know the dogs hit on something. Bender has said it may be a large mammal - like an elk. Elk are massive creatures... (A bull elk can stand 5ft. tall at the shoulders, and weigh 700 lbs.). Yet, even with all the dives they didn't
find an elk or other large mammal, either...
So, something is in the lake, and it's likely at the very bottom... The dogs hit on something (and have as recently as February a full 3 months
after the LE called off their official dives). It's either an animal that could weigh as much as 700 pounds and would be much bigger than a boy's body, or there is (more likely) a person's body in the lake - whether Dylan's or someone else's.
They didn't find
anything that could explain away the hits completely - especially not the hits they got in February in the same places. (Remember decomp is extremely slow in very cold water, and with the depth and temperature in the lake decomp could have been slowed tremendously as at depth I would assume the water temperature is not above 45 degrees - even now as the average lake temp. is only 48 - and that's based on an algorithm and not actually recording of the water itself in various areas).
As always, all of the above is MOO! I remain skeptical that LE could completely rule the lake out as they didn't find an explanation for the dogs' hits - especially the later ones.
The NM dive team did an incredible job, risked their lives to do the dives, had their work double- and triple-checked as I'm sure they always do. I have no doubt that they put in their best-faith efforts, and it sounds to me like the dive team is pretty convinced he isn't in there.
I don't believe they are in a position to completely rule out the lake - although I do believe they are in a position to not be able to justify expenditure for a continued search, especially given the risks diving in this lake entails.
I wish that there was a way the private/professional search team could get there sooner. It would be much easier for me to dismiss the lake itself if there were a more thorough search in warmer water, with ROV's.
That's where I am on this part. I don't believe the LE is necessarily lying about what the dive team believes - I'm just of the opinion that a more thorough search should be done with other technologies given the limitations of the first search team.
I guess you could call this holding out hope as well... I just want answers and I'm afraid if Dylan
isn't in the lake then truly "his bones are just laying out there somewhere" as ER worries about, or buried somewhere, and then how would we ever get
any answers? I just want Dylan to be able to come home to his Mom and his brother, his relatives, and his friends.
As always, all of the above is MOO except where referenced! :MOO: