No, I don't believe it would, yet.
First, we don't know if they requested the data, or when they requested it, or how long it took them to go over it all (or if they have yet).
There is SO much evidence already in this case, even if we the public don't realize it.
Think, cell data (which includes tower pings, texts, emails, photos, videos, sm site logins, private messages, deleted data that needed to be recovered),
neighborhood door cam vids, surv. vids, gps data, traffic cam data, physical evidence collected inside the house, the step-daughter's car, her car, the truck, banking info, retail business videos, and... that's just the stuff I can think of off the top of my head.
Without exception, in every case I've ever followed that also went to trial, the amount of evidence presented in court always blows me away, not only by what IS included that I never even thought of, but what ISN'T included that I thought would be.
The prosecution's opening statement almost always reveals details that never made it to the public, and hints at the evidence uncovered that is going to prove the case.
Then you have to wonder, how many people are actually working this case, and this case alone, all day long?
We don't even really know how many investigators and forensic specialists are working this case or how backlogged any of them are.
When you (and I don't mean you personally, just a general "you") stop and think about how much evidence has to be processed, and how carefully it all has to be processed, and then all the searches and leads and tips... and all the man hours that takes... that's a LOT of work, and it takes time.
Just something to think about.