Found Deceased CO - Gannon Stauch, 11, Colorado Springs, Lorson Ranch, El Paso County, 27 Jan 2020 *endangered* #23

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #941
BBM
It hit me last night, the only video we have seen is the one RD produced. Every home on that street probably has some footage, and it wouldn't surprise me one bit if RD's video was the worst one on the block!
Sounds quite logical.
 
  • #942
That's possible. But TS is quoted in the same article talking about "Al's truck" so I don't know if she sees them all the same. Also, is it usual for a husband and wife to have both names on car titles? I've not seen it done that way.

I've never known any couple who didn't put both names on their cars. There are really good reasons to do so.

She probably doesn't see them all the same. But of all the vehicles, I know which one she's lease likely to want anyone to look at. We shall see. At least, I hope so.

I believe an arrest warrant is coming - in less than 6 months.
 
  • #943
  • #944
If it is proved GS is not the reason for shadows on the RD video and he isn't shown on any other video timestamped after 2:19 PM, TS is guilty. It would be a matter of time in building a case to legal standard.

I don't mean to downplay the extreme difficulty of the work LE must enact to meet that standard, but metaphorically speaking, it's all 'paperwork', now.

Bye, Felicia.
 
  • #945
There's a part 3?
 
  • #946
  • #947
Nah I think they’ve got her number particularly the FBI. Which by the way I don’t think they were part of yesterday’s search. Think I only saw a handful from a particular search team. So where r those FBI agents searching these days. I wonder...
Ogden, Utah area code 801?
Up to 450 miles from CS?


They can handle her, nobody better. They're well versed in all her ways, even those we know noting about.
I wonder if there is any chance the case could be prosecuted as a federal case?
That would put the DP on the table.
Just sayin' ?
National security and all that...?
That’s an interesting thought!!
 
  • #948
The idea, work, an actual act of renting a car to search for your own child because he 'might be afraid' and 'recognize your regular vehicles' speaks volumes. Even if she didn't kill him, but he was in such extreme fear that he truly did run away, that in itself is intense. If my wife were to pick me up at the airport in a rental vehicle and explain that theory to me, my first question would be 'What the F did you do to scare him that much?'
Absolutely correct 10000%. GS would not be afraid of his “parents”, notice I didn’t speak from child’s point of view, GS would run to dad, not hide/be afraid of dad and TS...GS would be wrought with emotion seeing his father’s truck and run to him these many days later. Why the biscuits would bio dad buy into this crap, except weren’t they a vehicle down? With that said, children need their parents to survive, no matter how 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 the parent can be, a little outdoor exposure as a runaway makes forgetting the parental drama doable, it’s survival mode. Moving forward...
 
Last edited:
  • #949
I've never known any couple who didn't put both names on their cars. There are really good reasons to do so.

She probably doesn't see them all the same. But of all the vehicles, I know which one she's lease likely to want anyone to look at. We shall see. At least, I hope so.

I believe an arrest warrant is coming - in less than 6 months.
We have all our vehicles & RV titled with my husband's name, Mr. Knox or Mrs. Knox. If something happened to one or the other of us, we could sell the vehicle with a single signature.
 
  • #950
Yeah, I am suspect of the whole thing, so I tend to agree with your line of thinking. I guess maybe she didn’t know about the extra fuel charges if you don’t return it full. But I tend to think she didn’t spend a whole gas tank driving up and down streets either. Wouldn’t mind hearing AS weigh in as he may be able to confirm or deny how long they searched.

I think AS is bound not to chime in. Imagine being a parent that listens to lies of your spouse regarding your missing child. How much you have to hold back from tearing into them thru SM or MSM because you've been asked by LE not to jeopardize the investigation. The guy has my respect for not responding at this point. LS is clearly crazy and he'd probably want nothing more than to call her out publically. JMO.
 
  • #951
  • #952
  • #953
I've never known any couple who didn't put both names on their cars. There are really good reasons to do so.

She probably doesn't see them all the same. But of all the vehicles, I know which one she's lease likely to want anyone to look at. We shall see. At least, I hope so.

I believe an arrest warrant is coming - in less than 6 months.

BBM

It's not necessarily true shared car titles are good. The info below mirrors what I've been told and what friends have been told.

"For married couples the rule of thumb is for each spouse to individually own the car they drive. The reason for this is to limit liability in the event of an accident. Liability is assessed on the owner of the vehicle and the person driving at the time of the accident."
How To Title Your Cars To Limit Liability

JMO
 
  • #954
If it is proved GS is not the reason for shadows on the RD video and he isn't shown on any other video timestamped after 2:19 PM, TS is guilty. It would be a matter of time in building a case to legal standard.

I don't mean to downplay the extreme difficulty of the work LE must enact to meet that standard, but metaphorically speaking, it's all 'paperwork', now.

Bye, Felicia.

100% Agree....But I can see them dragging this out in hopes of having/finding some additional leverage to pressure T, in order to find the body. It's about as dragged out as it can be, if in fact, what you posted is viable. IMO
 
  • #955
DBM
 
  • #956
I vote "her car" = VW SUV. Clear to me.

I vote "we'll see in the future."

So is the document a fake, or is the Crime Online report wrong?

I think CrimeOnline has reason to believe the Kia was picked up in CS. I do not think they can document that, though, at this point, as they have basically retracted their first receipt publication. As to whether the full receipt shows a different drop off point, we have to wait to see (there are other receipts circulating around the internet, but we will go with the ones TS gave to CrimeOnline - of which there are two versions).

She apparently picked up in CS. Where she dropped off, we can't discuss at this point.

It's probably CS as well.

And there could be a non-criminal reason for the entire rental car event. As a well known WSer would say: probably irrelevant.
 
  • #957
IMO, I don't think it's odd. Good for AS, most military people I know personally are great at self discipline and knowing when NOT to talk.
They do say people tend to marry their opposite. #oppositesattractandall
 
  • #958
I think AS is bound not to chime in. Imagine being a parent that listens to lies of your spouse regarding your missing child. How much you have to hold back from tearing into them thru SM or MSM because you've been asked by LE not to jeopardize the investigation. The guy has my respect for not responding at this point. LS is clearly crazy and he'd probably want nothing more than to call her out publically. JMO.
Let's pray he gets that opportunity at her sentencing.
 
  • #959
What questions would you like to see answered by TS in Part 3?

Obviously... Where is Gannon?

I had heard that there was a part 3 coming. I don’t know. Seriously, I wish there was a gag order against her so we never had to hear from her. Maybe when she is sentenced to life in prison a simple “I am sorry for killing Gannon” is about all I would care to hear. We won’t get that either.
 
  • #960
apologies deleted, thought it was a crimeonline broadcast, it's someone else!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
144
Guests online
3,076
Total visitors
3,220

Forum statistics

Threads
632,570
Messages
18,628,581
Members
243,198
Latest member
ghghhh13
Back
Top