Yet she did not say those nice things about Gannon until she was asked by the reporter to tell us about Gannon and that's when she switched to past tense.I just watched the SM interview again. IMOO, she sounds so believable up until the hike questions start and she gets her daughter in it. That's when she starts talking a little less smoothly and such and nervous. I really do believe her, strangely, that she didn't hurt him and loved him and those nice things she said about him. But then the daughter/when was he last seen at home/hike/Burger King discussion is when things start to sound really suspicious and weird. I think she knows more than she is saying, but it just baffles me as to WHAT happened.
Weirdest is the "when you get here" - I suspect there was a runaway situation and yet she is culpable somehow too???
She never said a word about him other than to defend herself until she was promoted by the reporter.
Very early on investigators stated they did not believe he ran away. I do believe she is culpable, but not because he ran away.
Imo