So, I went over of the list of jurors. A man and a women were at Columbine. About 3, said they had someone in their family with some type of mental illness, one was a paramedic who transported mental patients. One an attorney, which I found curious. Usually, attorneys don't get picked for juries but they may be a cooperate or personal injury that didn't conflict.
I'm thinking just within this group, we have people that experienced first hand, a mass murder-they add an important view to the group. The attorney can help with the law. And the one's who experienced mental illness first hand- they easily understand that mental illness does not equal insane.
We had some generous posters here who shared their experiences with mental illness. To witnessing someone who is having a delusion &/or a psychotic break. They said that there was NO WAY that the person experiencing that would have ANY of the capabilities jh did. Even went further to say, they wouldn't be able to even drive to a place in full gear let alone to function to handle the guns. To that, he was speaking clearly to the police the whole time! They would be talking would be jibberish or at least make no sense in the throes of a psychotic break.
Just things I was putting together reviewing the jurors. Some who think he was insane, there are those who can explain that's not a way a psychotic break looks like, the attorney who can explain what is needed legally.