OMG!!!! Un-Freaking-believable. There are simply no words to adequately express the disgust I feel about these charlatans being allowed to testify as "experts" in a court of law :gaah::sick:
Excellent point, zoey! Simple, easy facetime. SMH.
AS a HC provider..WE were taught like 45 years ago+..When documenting on any patient in legal notes is that IF IT's Not Documented as completed, observed THEN it Never happened...
This witness is so unprofessional and making the ASSumption that her Word is GOOD enough ...SMH
Re BBM
I bet murderers like him never ever considered the possibility of getting just badly maimed and suffering. Like if LE would have glanced a shot across his face and wounded him badly making him suffer tremendously like he caused some others to suffer.
Or a shot near the back of the neck that would paralyze him from the neck down.
I bet he didnt think too much about that possibility. These type of criminals over simplify things. To him it was either he would be captured or a clean kill. I bet he didnt think of all the other possibilities much. Things like he caused to other people that survived and had to suffer.
I even wonder how much thought he gave to his victims having to endure suffering. IMO his kind over simplifies things.
WOW.."Twittervile" is all a Twitter with what Mr. B. is doing to Dr. Gur!! LOL suggesting a bottle of wine versus just a glass at lunch among other options for break time ROFLMBO!!
I don't use it but have heard of others using it...My problem is I don't like looking at myself while on the phone--there are times I don't put on make up and I'll be darned if I would for a phone call.....(I'm not all that vain---BUT I have limits :blushing![]()
I'm surprised JH told Dr Gur that he only intended to harm the people in the theatre. He wanted the points value for each life. That was a blatant lie and he was trying to mislead the Dr.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
croakerqueen123 ‏@croakerqueen · 2m2 minutes ago
#theatershooting #theatertrial - Day 45 - Part 2: http://youtu.be/ENvQdGMR4WA?a
It's ok if it's just family. You should hear me when I'm FaceTiming my grandson.
"ISAAC!! ITS YOUR NANA!!!!!"
Poor kid is probably deafened by me lol!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
However, he wasn't captured or injured----HE SURRENDERED :truce: IMO big difference He saw the enemy (law enforcement) and gave up .....
I think grandkids would be fun!!!! One of my daughters has told me expect a Golden Retriever as my grandchild from her--or a basset hound...:tantrum:
i don't use it but have heard of others using it...my problem is i don't like looking at myself while on the phone--there are times i don't put on make up and i'll be darned if i would for a phone call.....(i'm not all that vain---but i have limits :blushing![]()
I know that an expert witness has to state clearly in their report the details to support how they came to their opinion. What GB is doing magnificently is showing that is NOT what Gur did.
She's left out important info/incidents & also "made up" her own statements about what jh said. Even putting in a statement that was something, that was a title of her book "A Call to Arms" that he never said. By 're-editing' her report, using select things, she then shows that is how she came to her opinion.
That is the problem for the defense using this type of witness instead of a board certified Forensic psychiatrist!!!!!
It also explains why her report was 15 pages compared to Dr. Reid's that was, if I recall about 200 pages!
BTW, channel 7 uses defense attorneys to comment, that are so clearly biased or not even watching the trial, IMO!!!!!
That guy said, GB is falling short on discrediting Gur because she is standing strong against him! WTH? IMO, she's wilting like a flower in the summer heat!
I love and adore being a grandma! He calls me Nanny...he's 7. Never had so much fun! And now, a miracle! Have 3 sons, 1 grandson and in August.....A GRANDDAUGHTER!!! :happydance::loveyou:
I know that an expert witness has to state clearly in their report the details to support how they came to their opinion. What GB is doing magnificently is showing that is NOT what Gur did.
She's left out important info/incidents & also "made up" her own statements about what jh said. Even putting in a statement that was something, that was a title of her book "A Call to Arms" that he never said. By 're-editing' her report, using select things, she then shows that is how she came to her opinion.
That is the problem for the defense using this type of witness instead of a board certified Forensic psychiatrist!!!!!
It also explains why her report was 15 pages compared to Dr. Reid's that was, if I recall about 200 pages!
BTW, channel 7 uses defense attorneys to comment, that are so clearly biased or not even watching the trial, IMO!!!!!
That guy said, GB is falling short on discrediting Gur because she is standing strong against him! WTH? IMO, she's wilting like a flower in the summer heat!
Daubert announced a four-part test to determine admissibility of an expert witness’s testimony. It asks:
Is the witness an expert in the sense of having credentials or experience?
Does the testimony have a basis in fact?
Is it relevant and reliable?
Are there other factors that bear upon the question of admissibility?