Hey,
I have no desire to be verified. I practiced for 17 years , am retired. Our countries notions about insanity, in 2015, are from a acquittal in 1843. Those are the standards still used in 2015 in AMerica. Much has been learned about mental illiness in the last, if I can do the math, in the last 172 years. For decades , lay citiaens notions of mental illiness, meant one had to be outside talking to Venus about Pluto.
Much has been learned. For years our society kept the folks suffering the most in horrible conditions:
MId 70's America decided that these people are not bad people - they are sick folks.
Does the 172 year old McNaughton rule, in 2015. in a civilized society, have much merit - IMO none. I worked with many very sick folks, who, at times , not be talking to the clouds. There is a continum here- kind of like a flue, fever rises, subsdies. Lay folks like to beleive that one is either talking to manholes, and street signs.
That is not how severe psycopatholy manifests. It, like most other illiness, has ebbs and flows, worse, and less intense.
This 172 year old notion, did he know it was wrong, of course he did - that in and of itself does not eradicate his desire to do kill as many as possible, becasue his neurotranmitters are not firing correctly.
Sleep walkers who kill are determined to be sleep walkers who kill. He is , and has been, since birth, a very ill individual. I had many folks, who when their cycle subsided could display insight into how wrong what had occurred "was".
Their behaviors, at times, (this was a person who got into a tremendous grad program with 5 others). There is not correlation between brillance and neurotransmitter problems. None.
He is sick, very, genious, like Einsteen, he needs to be placed, for the rest of his life, in a psyc setting.
172 year old notion of "insanity", needs revision:
M'Naghten fired a pistol at the back of Peel's secretary, Edward Drummond, who died five days later. The
House of Lords asked a panel of judges, presided over by
Sir Nicolas Conyngham Tindal,
Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, a series of hypothetical questions about the defence of insanity. The principles expounded by this panel have come to be known as the
M'Naghten Rules, though they have gained any status only by usage in the common law and M'Naghten himself would have been found guilty if they had been applied at his trial.[SUP]
[2][/SUP][SUP]
[3][/SUP] The rules so formulated as
M'Naghten's Case 1843 10 C & F 200[SUP]
[4][/SUP] have been a standard test for criminal liability in relation to mentally disordered defendants in
common law jurisdictions ever since, with some minor adjustments. When the tests set out by the Rules are satisfied, the accused may be adjudged "not guilty by reason of insanity" or "guilty but insane" and the
sentence may be a mandatory or discretionary (but usually indeterminate) period of treatment in a secure hospital facility, or otherwise at the discretion of the
court (depending on the country and the offence charged) instead of a punitive disposal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M'Naghten_rules