CO - Jessica Ridgeway, 10, Westminster, 5 Oct 2012 - #12

[SouthernMom]

Not finding any decription of the car AL was driving. Is this intentional?

 

[carbuff]

I was looking at it earlier today and absolutely fascinated, esp. with some of the matches that have been made, but was still trying to figure out how it all works. As you can see, I'm hooked on this thread, but I will definitely come poke around more tomorrow. Thank you!

Here's one that might be a good place to start:

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=8465208#post8465208"]OR OR - Willamette River in Portland - White Female (NamUs #9599) 30-40, Sept 1993 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

And absolutely nothing to do with dismemberment.

 

[danzn16]

(Anyone else here get nervous/paranoid about the google searches you end up doing as a result of this thread? Everything from body recovery sites to potassium cyanide. Sigh. )

God I know morbid. That along with my self defense and concealed carry research I would probably look like a right crazy person ugh

 

[winterrose]

If LE is saying this guy isn't connected this fast, I swear I'm starting to think they know what the guy looks like or something that is having them throw it out so fast. A possible suspect pops up and wham, they say it's not him. They know alot more than what they're telling.

 

[danzn16]

Oh, you're talking to an internet autodidact of the first order, it's just that I'm usually googling more innocent things, like 16th century British history, or "why does my cat try to lick my armpit".

Hahahhahaha omg dying at this :floorlaugh:

 

[NC Analyzer]

If LE is saying this guy isn't connected this fast, I swear I'm starting to think they know what the guy looks like or something that is having them throw it out so fast. A possible suspect pops up and wham, they say it's not him. They know alot more than what they're telling.

Maybe, maybe not. You could also look at this in reverse. Every new suspect that is detained may be able to provide an airtight confirmed alibi for the time frame J was missing.

 

[danzn16]

I was looking at it earlier today and absolutely fascinated, esp. with some of the matches that have been made, but was still trying to figure out how it all works. As you can see, I'm hooked on this thread, but I will definitely come poke around more tomorrow. Thank you!

The unidentified forum is wonderful. You'll really get hooked. Such a great thing when someone can be be returned to their families.

 

[margarita25]

I would imagine FBI, WPD and all these guys would need to be the ones to make the connection and official announcement. The guy who quoted "no link at this time" is Boulder Sheriff's Dept. This guy hasn't been in custody long enough, IMO.

Who knows what they'll say about this tomorrow after further investigation.

 

[thess]

Here's one that might be a good place to start:

OR OR - Willamette River in Portland - White Female (NamUs #9599) 30-40, Sept 1993 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

And absolutely nothing to do with dismemberment.

You've definitely got me intrigued now, but I see I'll need to find out what 'missing' databases you pull from for matches. But the main problem right now is that it's late and for some reason just looking at her sketch made me more creeped out than I already am from reading about Jessica for two days running. I need to wait for daylight to take this on.

 

[carbuff]

You've definitely got me intrigued now, but I see I'll need to find out what 'missing' databases you pull from for matches. But the main problem right now is that it's late and for some reason just looking at her sketch made me more creeped out than I already am from reading about Jessica for two days running. I need to wait for daylight to take this on.

Oh, I didn't mean that you should tackle it right now. Just whenever you're ready. Yeah, it's sometimes a little creepy. Sometimes a day or week or longer is needed -- I just recently got back from a long break. I was seeing bodies everywhere...

 

[winterrose]

Maybe, maybe not. You could also look at this in reverse. Every new suspect that is detained may be able to provide an airtight confirmed alibi for the time frame J was missing.

So true, but his Dad lives in Broomfield, just sayin'.

 

[Marilynilpa]

Oh, you're talking to an internet autodidact of the first order, it's just that I'm usually googling more innocent things, like 16th century British history, or "why does my cat try to lick my armpit".

BBM

And what did you find out??

 

[ZhaZhaHa]

CU-Boulder was recently evacuated over an odd smell

http://www.dailycamera.com/cu-news/...ering-center-evacuated-over-unidentified-odor

Posted: 10/15/2012 05:01:58 PM MDT
Updated: 10/15/2012 06:14:04 PM MDT

Several hundred students have been evacuated from the Engineering Center at the University of Colorado at Boulder so firefighters could investigate an odor that was first noticed in the chemical wing, according to CU police.

That was nothing. People working in the building at the time didn't even know they were evacuating until text messages and emails were received. There are typically a few evacuations per semester in Engineering and in the Chem buildings.

 

[ZhaZhaHa]

And "several hundred" sounds crazy until you stop and think that it's really only about 6-7 classrooms

 

[sassysleuth]

BBM

And what did you find out??

Yes yes, share with the class!

 

[carbuff]

As quickly as they've been able to rule out several people, I have to agree that they know something, perhaps more than one thing, that will immediately identify the guilty party. And not DNA -- even at the fastest, that takes a day or two.

Either that, or they've developed tunnel vision. But I don't think so.

 

[Marilynilpa]

I would imagine FBI, WPD and all these guys would need to be the ones to make the connection and official announcement. The guy who quoted "no link at this time" is Boulder Sheriff's Dept. This guy hasn't been in custody long enough, IMO.

Who knows what they'll say about this tomorrow after further investigation.

I think they'll say the blue-eyed guy they have in custody is not the brown-eyed man being sought in the attempted lurings.

Seriously, as has been mentioned before, the police sketch is so generic that the man looks like half the people you pass on the street every day. JMO

 

[ZhaZhaHa]

And if we're talking news in Colorado, can we go back to the fire in RMNP? Why the heck did we get a wildfire this late in the season? It started when Jessica was still missing, and I remember my boss saying maybe it was her giving a signal. But what if it was evidence burning?

I think it is a long shot, but still. We've had so many weird stories pop up this month it is unreal. 5 people killed and burned in a bar fire in an apparent murder cover? A guy driving around with his dismembered mother in the car? And apparently the reports of attempted abductions just went through the roof. This is crazy.

 

[ZhaZhaHa]

I think they'll say the blue-eyed guy they have in custody is not the brown-eyed man being sought in the attempted lurings.

Seriously, as has been mentioned before, the police sketch is so generic that the man looks like half the people you pass on the street every day. JMO

That is no joke. I have had the "I swear I know that guy" feeling about this sketch since day 1. But he looks like lots of guys

 

[absentia]

ok, my last post for tonight (I must add that I'm not appreciating the things moving around in the back yard due to wind. it sounds creepy).

In being concerned with our kids' safety, and with preventing these monsters from being created in the first place, my opinion is that Dr Sears' philosophy on parenting is highly valuable. mainly the part about babies' need level and temperament, and how the mother matches and responds to it or doesn't, as well as the attachment theory.

basically, if you have a highly sensitive, smart, emotional and needy baby and you let him cry it out and treat him in a way in which he feels ignored or unloved, (not picking him up, leaving him in the crib/playpen, car seat with a bottle or binky all day - 1950's Dr Spock stuff) regardless of what you think he needs or is enough, he's going to shut down emotionally and develop some negative imprints in his psyche and emotions. If you have a mellow, low needs baby and you let them cry it out they may be ok. they prob won't cry much even. If the high needs baby is not responded to the level of their needs, they may be ok if everything else goes right in their life. but if they imprinted some tripped wiring early on and then they experience abuse or other trauma during early life, there could be big problems for some of them later on. some could become nobel laureates and some psychopaths.

So the responsiveness of the mother to the child's inherent temperament and need level can set up a child for emotional happiness and being well adjusted, or can lay the foundation for some pretty messed up stuff.
there's a reason white men are usually the serial killers. most other cultures practice some form of attachment parenting and/or village parenting/extended family child rearing - co sleeping, extended nursing, baby wearing, someone always in contact with baby and meeting their needs etc.
western cultures (thanks to the victorian age) stopped treating babies like humans and more like objects that do not become whole, real human beings until they grow up, and male babies & kids were expected to be strong. (not cry, be "wimpy", needy, etc).

I just don't believe people are born like this psychotic sociopath. they are created with bad wiring. and that is dependent on negative early childhood development.