SmoothOperator
Sadly what connects all these puzzles is that ther
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,591
- Reaction score
- 80
It’s obvious his motivation was not just to experience joy at taking the life of this child. He left out the part of sexually assaulting her and didn’t add much as to the “joy” he got out of dismembering her and most likely torturing her as well. I really don’t believe his account of what he says happened. IMO he thoroughly thought out what he planned to do to her well in advance of the abduction. Always just MOO.
correct, imo it is speculation and opinion that imo is quite obviously based upon the information that we, the public were thus far relayed..As stated twice in my post, all my own opinions from what little information is available. All my own speculation.
those details that were relayed to us were..
-Sigg says he spotted her walking and turned his vehicle and double back to where she was walking
-Sigg says that he grabbed her from the street she was walking along
-Sigg says he hogtied her
-Sigg says he strangled her as well upon his getting her into his vehicle.
-Sigg says that the murdering of Jessica did not give him the rush he thought it should
-Sigg says that it is the above that led to his deciding to dismember her.
Those are basically the exact details that were relayed to us therefor it is obviously exactly this issue of the details relayed to us IN NO WAY WHATSOEVER MENTION, IMPLIED, OR EVEN ALLUDED TO SEXUAL ASSAULT ON JESSICA.. This imo quite clearly is where an opinion is born of regarding an OBVIOUS OMISSION OF SEXUAL MOTIVATION..
An opinion that you are by far alone in and tho, none us have the detailed hard facts in this case[or any other case] we can only work with what we have..and in this case those factoids that we have obviously have ZERO MENTION OF SEXUAL MOTIVATION WRT Sigg's initial version of events..