- Joined
- May 17, 2009
- Messages
- 34,709
- Reaction score
- 232,212
The pics we saw last night the tree was down.
Someone with twitter should tell this guy to not be so da**ed sensational...they did not say that word.
There's a reason they're continuing the search for her, they don't have all of her yet.Sadly, after what I saw, I thought that last night. I'm honestly not sure if it was animals, I saw a black garbage bag around what appeared to be a torso.
Really wishing I had taken screenshots of those pix last night. Normally I am really good about that, was just so tired I lapsed. Need to figure this tree thing out.
This drives me nuts - we all heard the POI say that the body was not intact. But here is how it is now being reported:
http://www.9news.com/news/article/293899/71/Body-dismembered-still-unknown-if-its-Jessica
The body is referred to as dismembered. To me, that is something a little different than "not intact". Dismemberment sounds more like a deliberate act on someone's part, whereas "not intact" could mean the body was disturbed by predators or scavengers.
Does anybody else feel that dismembered is not the same as "not intact"??
Not necessarily, Stephen McDaniel comes to mind.
http://www.macon.com/2012/06/24/2071775/night-of-panic-the-evening-before.html
If I'm looking at it right, in the pictures posted by Zola, the tree is upright during daylight, near the small wooden fence where her body was located. In the pictures when it's dark, the tree is down, right by that same fence. At least that's what it looks like to me.
if it were animal activity, I would think they would find other parts very close by. I can only imagine this sick twist disposing of her body parts all over the place like he did the backpack. This is a game to him.