Rayemonde
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2014
- Messages
- 7,551
- Reaction score
- 645
I wish I could see a photo of the rebar/webbing in the top of the chimney mentioned above, and of "the wood-burning insert in the fireplace of the cabin that made it impossible to get through the chimney at the bottom". I'm so confused!
The coroner agreed that Josh couldn't have got *up* the chimney, so he must have undressed in the cabin, gone outside, climbed onto the roof and then climbed down the chimney. The coroner said that the grate that blocked the top of the chimney had probably been removed at some point, or had disintegrated with age. But the coroner definitely agreed that the wood-burner and the heavy furniture that was in front of the fireplace would have made it impossible for Josh to get into the chimney from inside the cabin.
So why would he start out inside the cabin, undress and then go outside and climb onto the roof and down the chimney, when he knew that it would be impossible for him to get out at the bottom??
I'm not buying the paradoxical undressing and terminal burrowing theory, because he was less than a mile from home. If he had started to get cold he could have just walked home - it's not like he was stranded out in the wilderness somewhere.
I think that either foul play was involved (someone forced him to undress and go down the chimney, probably thinking he would manage to get out again or would be found alive - because if you murdered someone and went to the trouble of hiding their body in a chimney you wouldn't leave their clothes on the floor to be found), he thought there was a cat or something stuck in the chimney and was trying to rescue it, or he had a mental illness that we don't know about and was psychotic (or he was on recreational drugs that caused psychosis, but the tests didn't pick up on them).
The psychosis theory would be similar to Elisa Lam, whose naked body was found drowned in a hotel water tank on the hotel roof.