- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
- Messages
- 4,115
- Reaction score
- 38,565
But isn't solicitation quite clear? That is asking someone to murder someone. It is not helping someone to help them get rid of a body.
LE aren't confused about the charges. Sometimes charges get reduced or dropped as a strategy. Right now they would have to charge him with everything they have the evidence for, in order to have options to drop/reduce some later.
In the local case near me, the dude was charged with murder but also with burglary (he used her car to move her body) and also with arson (he tried to burn his own house down with her body inside). I'm quite confident he won't be prosecuted on those last two unless "needed" -- ie something goes wrong with the murder charge.
By the way, this gives me an idea -- do we think PF might have transported KB using her own vehicle? I wonder if LE has put cadaver dogs on them...
They may have been doing the same, or if she was making payments to them, they may have been treating it as a "rent to own." I'm not sure anyone knows about that. I think the deed just shows the parents LLC as the owners. But I do think they may have done it that way to protect her from having PF getting an interest in the property. MOO.
What I recall from earlier threads was that KB's parents' LLC was the lender for KB's purchase. If that's the case, they aren't the owners, KB would be the listed owner. The LLC would be the lienholder only. This is MOO
<modsnipped quoted post>
I would like to see the source. Colorado Springs makes sense, if her first job was in Peyton which is a bit east of CS. Grand Junction doesn't make much sense but I guess it's closer than WA state was, if she was just trying to be in the vicinity.
Last edited by a moderator: