Not if it <blood, or tissue> was well hidden, ie scrubbed, painted over OR it was in such an obscure location they wouldn't have known/seen it without a 'tip' from a person involved?? MOO
ETA: Both samples
It’s illegal to take out life insurance on someone without their knowledge unless it is taken out by a legal guardian or someone who has power of attorney.Can one take out life insurance on someone without their knowledge?
I agree LA, that and protecting Baby K <btw I lol'd too over the MOOing>No, I definitely don’t think they care about financial gain- just wondered if it was a way to prevent PF from gathering the funds to hire private counsel.
True, but depending on what kind of business man he was as well, would explain how much 'expendable' cash he would spend too..This is unknowable at this point.
It obviously depends on how much money he was making, and what his expenses were.
Just because he may not have had certain living expenses, doesn’t mean he was rolling in cash.
Sanders is Kaherine Jackson's personal l lawyer who helped her through probate . He was involved in the Biggie Smalls case.I don't want to get off-topic, but are you sure you're not thinking about B.I.G.? There's an abbreviated list of interesting civil cases here and I would expect to see MJ on there if Sanders was involved in that case: Perry R. Sanders Jr. | Founding Partner | Sanders Law Firm, CO
In the media, two stories by PF were related 1) KB was to drop the child off and 2) he was to come by to pick her up. One third scenario would have been Thanksgiving together but that didn't not seem like a plan. For people outside of the US, Thanksgiving is a very big family dinner day. A lot of cooking, eating, family, football watching, and visiting. It is a very family-oriented day. LE has stated the PF does place himself as the last person to see KB. KB's townhome is approximately fifteen miles from PF's mother's property.
You’re thinking too hard on this one, I think. This initial lawsuit filing, at this extremely early date, must by necessity be very broad and general. They’re going to speak in plurals over singulars to cover the bases. I doubt these civil lawyers know the specifics of KB’s injuries when LE couldn’t even nail down one specific theory of the circumstances of her killing.Still makes me think she endured a beating. “Fatal injuries”, in the plural. I rule out gunshot, that’s too messy.
Per the large items removed from her home, could be no dna, it might be only cleaning fluids found.
Think back to nurse Melanie McGuire (machete melanie).
Iirc, they cd find no dna for her missing husband, two kids or Mel, in the family home. NONE.
Possibly, but she's still free, PF is not. Goodness only knows what he told her. He could have been leading a "double" life to a degree. IN thinks KB is an ex only, nothing more. They share a child. PF tells her, she won't stop thinking we're going to get together again. IN comes down for TG with other relatives but plans to meet up with PF on Sat. He tells her he finally told KB it's not going to happen, he's not interested. Said she needed some time to think and she's going to see her granny with a friend. She left her cell phone behind and if LE find it, they may think I have something to do with it. He gets rid of the purse, because that would be a red flag for IN. He convinces her to take the phone and make a couple of fake texts.Sometimes I have to remind myself of what we do know to keep my speculation at bay.
The IN, unless she decided to go on the spur of the moment to WP, had to know what was going to happen.
According to what we know PF was shopping around for someone to kill KB since September 2018.
The murder was Thanksgiving Day. According to LE.
If you know someone is coming to visit you on a certain day you don't pick that day to murder someone UNLESS the person is in on it. So for those who think KK just took the phone and didn’t participate further I don’t think the facts support that theory. IF it was a crime of passion maybe I could lean towards that theory. BUT looking for, solicitating, someone for 3 months sounds like he (they) preplanned it.
KK is up to her cowgirl boots in this situation . JMO
Maybe she ran to Safeway and then came back and jumped in the shower.
It was when she was in the shower, that PF and/or the killer(s) ambushed her.
Crime scene investigators removed some big pieces from her house. One
appeared to be a big curved piece that could have come from her shower.
IMO
I agree LA, that and protecting Baby K <btw I lol'd too over the MOOing>
PF also had a 10 window to make it all look normal. I think when the family did their check, they didn't suspect anything. I asked if a real search with dogs, etc. was conducted during this time, but I'm not sure if anyone knows for sure.Exactly, that’s what I’m saying. We can assume from K’s bro, there was nothing out of place, no visible blood evidence, etc.
Did someone tell LE “I helped so & so wash the kitchen walls, or......”
Good point, never thought to look if she was in running gear..Although, I would always just use my stroller for my shopping cart when I was on foot with my little....IMO, good theory.
I think it's spelled H-E-double hockey sticks. At least that's my hope.There are maximum security prisons in Canon City Colorado. Don’t know, of course, but that would be a guess.
Thanks for making that point RioloveYou guys, it's pretty much guaranteed from a legal standpoint that there is no way PF is benefiting financially from this at all.
You’re thinking too hard on this one, I think. This initial lawsuit filing, at this extremely early date, must by necessity be very broad and general. They’re going to speak in plurals over singulars to cover the bases. I doubt these civil lawyers know the specifics of KB’s injuries when LE couldn’t even nail down one specific theory of the circumstances of her killing.
Maybe she ran to Safeway and then came back and jumped in the shower.
It was when she was in the shower, that PF and/or the killer(s) ambushed her.
Crime scene investigators removed some big pieces from her house. One
appeared to be a big curved piece that could have come from her shower.
IMO
Yes it does. The verbiage about class Is under the section heading “Second Cause of Action - Negligence Per Se”Generally when we speak of a class to which a victim belongs, and that class being protected by said law, we are speaking in terms of negligence per se; this is legal speak for the negligence being presumed and not needing to be further proved. IIRC, the civil suit seems to have negligence per se as a claim the Berreths are making?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.