Yep. She's not dumb. With all the stories about his temper, she's got her excuse figured out. The baby's mother is always painted as the crazy one, so, he just had to murder her. Oh, and he was just kidding around with KKL when he wanted KB murdered.
The motive the R's stated is bull. If you think the other parent is a danger to your child, you go to family services. You don't murder.
I can tell you that KK will never work again in that hospital and will never allowed to work in any facility where she handles dangerous drugs.
Who on earth wants someone as unstable as lovelorn little KK injecting drugs into patients?
Even if fully aquitted of any involvement, no future employer is ever going to allow her near any IV or dangerous oral medications.
Two concerns
From the CBC article,
Asked what they heard was Frazee's motive, Patty said, "That he felt that Kelsey was going to harm the child, that she was crazy."
Concern 1.
To me, if this statement is true, in the meaning that KK heard these words from PF, the implication is totally opposite. KB was sane.
I wonder, however, if PF is mentally ill and very paranoid. A grave danger to be in the society, to be let out. Ever. And if he had really killed before, it has to be investigated. MOO - it might be a serious statement.
The population of Florissant is 104 people. Today the student body in Woodland Park High is 782. It is unranked. Here is a little bit about students' performance.
https://www.usnews.com/education/be...strict-no-re-2/woodland-park-high-school-4377
Is that possible that in an underperforming school, in a tiny city, Patrick's severe emotional problems had been missed?
Quite possibly. People here pointed out at the way he treated the dogs. I am not a dog breeder, I would not know. But someone might review the YouTube movies and say what he thinks. And maybe I was wrong at discounting the opinion of the person accusing him of maltreatment of the horses. It all might be very, very serious.
Concern 2. MOO.
KKL did not love PF, and he did not have a hold on her. To participate in such a crime for your lover, no matter to what degree, means, to love with abandon. There are many examples of it in history. But usually such love implies standing by your beloved till the end. Not giving him up. Not talking.
KKL is very scared. She is now getting it. What I see here, in this situation, is some adolescent high. Teenagers might attack random people, or someone they know, in groups. They do it to test their power over the world. But - they are teenagers.
How did two very adult people, both with kids, could partake in a crime?
Immaturity and mental issues in a 32-year old man are less shocking than immaturity in a 32-year old mother of two kids. MOO.
I just wish the R's would STFU I am afraid they are doing more damage than good for no reason whatsoever. Why insert themselves (lawyers even!) where they do not belong in public, national TV no less. I just don't get it! Not to help KB moo.
I don't buy this either. Coming forward and speaking as they have they are likely subjecting her to far MORE harassment.This interview is crazy. The R's said they came forward because the BFF was being harassed... they are NOT helping her whatsoever.
Is it just me, or is the reporter asking the questions a different woman than the clip we had before? LOL
One of my suspicions is that PF chose to solicit KK’s help because she may have had access to dangerous drugs. There are several drugs that can cause death if administered in the right amount. JMHO
I don't buy this either. Coming forward and speaking as they have they are likely subjecting her to far MORE harassment.
I just wish the R's would STFU I am afraid they are doing more damage than good for no reason whatsoever. Why insert themselves (lawyers even!) where they do not belong in public, national TV no less. I just don't get it! Not to help KB moo.
Is this normal for attorneys to do?!!
And its not helping KK or themselves if that was their intention. I wondered why MSM broke up the interview into 3 tiny parts. It's a risk with other developing news, or other breaks in this case overshadowing this interview. Now I think because if they showed it all at once it would looked ridiculous to people, hitting them all at once.
Airing 1- We knew but only a little info and when we found out about the poor dear girl (KB) from her mom on tv- we told FBI
Airing 2- Poor girl (KK) so scared, kids threatened, has the cell phone
Airing 3- (Spec) Poor scared girl (KK) went to colorado at Thanksgiving to see her grandma (or friends, or extended family- whatever). And she saw PF and he told her he did it and she was going to help or else. So she took the cellphone and drove as far away from as she could- her home in Idaho 800 miles away. She sent the texts. Imagine how scared she was with all that space between them, and the cellphone (proof that PF murdered KB) in her hands. Poor girl she had no one to protect her. Imagine going to the police with no evidence.
Most of the general public hearing it broken up might not remember all the details from the first airing or second but put it all in one segment- and it is WTH? this is ridiculous JMO
Hooey. Not for one minute. It's the dramatic nonsense created by emotionally stunted females that would only be believed by that same group, like a twitterfest. She's lying. If this is the star witness and basis for the solicitation charges, the case is deeply troubled.I’m not buying what Krystal (via the R’s) is selling...
MOO
Probably not but without saying too much, looks like the Rs are used to doing things that aren’t normal.
Would some drugs if in powdered form leave residue as evidence?Drugs wouldn't make a messy crime scene though, that caused LE to determine that she was murdered in her home :/
Small correction:Motive: PF felt that KB was going to harm their child; she was crazy.
Would some drugs if in powdered form leave residue as evidence?
On my local news yesterday we had a Drug sniffing Police dog
reported as having a seizure from finding Ecstasy in an investigation. something to think about.
If I had an employee being harassed, I would certainly do what I could to help him/her. But this just seems strange and is stirring the pot. So I guess my answer is "no". I would do this if I was them.Is this normal for attorneys to do?!!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.