BBM. With all due respect, you do come across as an attorney who would be more likely to sit at the table closer to the jury, and I know that you know what I mean.
I'll let people who feel PF might stand a chance of getting off answer for themselves. You asked a question and I speculated, and I should not have. If there are those who feel this way, I hope that they will feel free to answer without the fear of being intimidated for expressing their opinion.
I would expect the jury will be instructed that the fact that PF has been arrested and charged is not to be considered by them as evidence that he is guilty of the crime. You are suggesting that since we are not on the jury that we should take law enforcement's word for it. I respect your opinion, but I will also wait--eagerly--to see their plethora of evidence.
I DO sit closer to the jury haha. You're correct about that.
I have zero intent of intimidating ANYONE. Just expressing my opinion about why people are speculating about his complete innocence.
However, we are also NOT on the jury and do NOT have to give him the benefit of the doubt. The presumption of innocence only exists in the courtroom. And in there, the jury will have all the evidence that we don't.