D
Deleted member 718
Guest
Agreed. IMO, KB was in a more stable situation as far as her income/finances than PF.
KB purchased the townhome. PF stayed at the ranchette. He did not contribute toward the purchase of the townhome.
New homes incur added expenses. KB purchased the home prior to September.
IMO, if KB had started bringing up issues r/t lack of consistent, meaningful financial support for Baby K's needs and/or if KB broached the subject of seeking formal child support and/or child custody arrangements, this would have absolutely enraged PF.
PF is not someone who would adopt a "What's mine is yours attitude" r/t anything, but especially not his money or his personal possessions.
IMO, some type of monetary factors + child custody + PF being a total PF = motive.
JMO.
*Edited to correct initials.
I agree. I think money is the motive. I think he owed her money and outside of selling his herd, he had no way to pay her back.
Kelsey gone=problem gone. His herd is safe.