I have been racking my brain, and you just made me remember what I've been trying to remember! The Drew Peterson case I believe it was. The one who had multiple wives and killed perhaps more than one of them.
In the Drew Peterson case, they could not bring up the lawyer to prove and or discuss that she had gone to a divorce lawyer. Because that lawyer had been highered. There for attorney-client privilege that lasted even after her death if I recall correctly.
But they finally were able to bring in another lawyer, because she had met him and talked about divorce in a restaurant, but she never had retained him. So prosecution was able to get that guy on stand and testify about the divorce proceedings and questions.
I think that the district attorney here, has just done a telegraph salvo across the bow as to knowing that there are legal papers, and that they have been seen, knowing that he will not be able to get them from the lawyer if PF had talked to him? But he can put on the stand the mother to talk about such?
Hope that makes sense what I'm saying.
Friday, he got it on the record that there were papers, but he will have no legal way to get them from the lawyer, and only from his mother or somebody else.?
Could that be what is going on here?
ETA typo