AgeofAquaruis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 5,898
- Reaction score
- 51,639
She speaks with a forked tongue.KK told her ex-husband she thought someone was trying to 'set her up'.
She speaks with a forked tongue.KK told her ex-husband she thought someone was trying to 'set her up'.
That was her gun.
Yeah, that would be PF.KK told her ex-husband she thought someone was trying to 'set her up'.
Without his clean up girl and her taking the phone to ID, he wouldn't have lasted a week unapprehended.I just don't think he is as smart as he thinks he is. I think he was more concerned with the timing of it all than the well thought out details.
line item #76 says that KB's purse contained mace, a pair of earrings and an ID card. Where is KB's wallet/driver's license/registration/car and health insurance cards/credit or debit card(s)?
KK says the purse was burned and she even took the IDs out of the wallet to make sure they would burn. I don't recall any other details.
This is an observation. The arrest affidavit is a combination of many parts of the investigation organized (nicely) for evidence purposes. It is in my humble opinion superbly organized and clear and packed with evidence for the preliminary hearing. Now, the issue is with any eye witness or witness is they are telling information through their perception. This is why the officers and agents try to get physical evidence to verify the matching statements which again this team does superbly. But then you have information that is subjective from KKL's point of view and at times told from PF's point of view. It is like taking slices of a photograph then slicing it again, it is blurry. Then you have some information that probably hints at the realm of improbability. You have to record the statements but they are probably fiction or massaged. This may not necessarily be purposeful in some cases. The brain depending if there is a psychosis may be interpreting how the person is reporting the information. Why some of us are seeing some statements as completely irrational is not surprising given the set of circumstances. Our brains are trying to map a picture of rational behavior and story but we just haven't heard one yet.JMO
It really does doesnt it.
How about.
PF takes her target practicing to make it look like she shot herself by accident but can never get her in quite the right position to do it right so chickens out.
Next night fakes a stomach problem to get her to come by and he couldnt get himself to kill her again.
Finally calls KK to come and lie in weight in her house and shoot her when she walks in the door after grocery shopping.
Its all so crazy I dont know what to think anymore.
But one thing I am really not believing right now is that anyone would let someone put a sweater over their head without majorly objecting to that. I could believe someone forcefully threw a sweater over her head though.
Sorry to mention this one more time but I feel like the importance of the 16min+ call might be missed. When did KK first have access to KB’s phone? IMO I think #39 of the affidavit explains. There’s so much in that one paragraph IMO
PF gave KK the phone after they burned KB's body at the ranchette.
MOO
No, her body was burned on the 24th. I don't know why PF called KK on the 24th. If that's been reported, I'm unaware of it.Yes...that happened on the 22nd. Why did PF call to speak with KK on the 24th (on KB’s cell) when KK had already burned trash bags from KB’s home on the 22nd?
The burning of contents of KB’s belongings supposedly happened on the 22nd-right? Or am I totally confused? If I’m not confused, then there are timelines that are seriously screwed up. IMO
Or, more specifically, to make sure it was never found!I think they wanted to destroy the body to hide the cause of death.
It’s just too weird an event (especially considering the timing), for it not to have some relevance here.
I could see some sort of random shooting scenario, or perhaps a staged gunshot suicide.
I’m not sure what exactly to make of it, but it’s something.
that's kb's gun tmar.
kk destroyed kb's phone in her front yard and disposed of it at the hospital iirc.
You must mean the heat Frazeed you.Yikes.
I came back after a long walk with my dog on a 32C day.
Perhaps the heat frazzled me.
No, her body was burned on the 24th. I don't know why PF called KK on the 24th. If that's been reported, I'm unaware of it.
MOO
She told her ex husband she "lost" her phone, and he took her to get a new one. (Affidavit point 49) This was the same day PF's phone was confiscated, so he probably warned her to get rid of it. MOO.
You must mean the heat Frazeed you.
Ish.so trial...2 years from now or what?
There are several airports she could have flown out of or to, use of connecting flights or driven the rest of the way. Denver airport is massive. Nobody is going to recall who they saw on a flight after so much time elapses.
If her friends were willing to loan her a vehicle, gun, and were willing to lie for her so her ex-husband wouldn't find out, I have no problem believing a friend gave her their ID so the ticket wouldn't have her name on it. The TSA agent would look at it, scan it and think nothing more of it. I doubt LE spent a lot of time tracking KK locations but I bet the defense will do so.
JMO
gitana1 said:RSBM
For her to be the killer, or present at the murder, the following must be true:
1. Her friend MG lied to the FBI/CBI about when KK borrowed the car and went to CO.
2. Her friend MG lied to the FBI/CBI about the reason for the text message KK sent to MG stating she was spending the night at MG's on the 24th.
3. Although MG lied about KK's whereabouts on 11-22-18, MG inexplicably gave the FBI/CBI other, highly incriminating information bout KK such as she took her car to CO the day after the murder, she swapped vehicles back on 11-25 at a certain location (which matched KB's last phone ping) and that a round was missing from her gun after KK had possession of it. ???
4. The FBI and CBI were fooled by MG's lies, thus despite being pros who make their living talking to witnesses, perps and gauging human behavior, they were incapable of determining that she was lying.
5. All of her family lied to the authorities about her whereabouts OR the FBI/CBI inexplicably are stupid idiots and failed to confirm where she was with family, on the day of the actual murder.
6. The FBI and CBI were fooled by her family's lies, thus despite being pros who make their living talking to witnesses, perps and gauging human behavior, they were incapable of determining that they were lying, OR, they ineptly failed to contact them at all or otherwise confirm KK's whereabouts on the day of the murder.
7. KK had reason to send a fake text to MG pretending she was going to spend the night at MG's on the 24th, so her husband wouldn't find out she was going to CO, but had no reason to send a similar text for the night of the 21st or 22nd, when she would've had to have been away from the home in order to be in CO for the murder.
8. Her ex husband lied to the FBI/CBI about her whereabouts on 11-22-18, covering for her murder of the mother of her boyfriend's child.
9. Although CL lied about her whereabouts on 11-22-18, her ex husband inexplicably gave the FBI/CBI other, incriminating information about KK such as she was actually romantically linked to PF, despite telling the FBI she was not, giving the FBI information about her google email account, that she bought on a new cell phone on 12-4, and was "nervous" after the FBI contacted her.
10. The FBI and CBI were fooled by CL's lies, thus despite being pros who make their living talking to witnesses, perps and gauging human behavior, they were incapable of determining that he was lying.
11. The FBI/CBI are both inept and failed to locate her phone pings on 11-22-18 and/or ignored pings indicating she was in CO at that time.
12. The state is stupid (while websleuthers cracked the case) and elicited testimony that KB was not in CO until 11-24, in error.
13. The defense is stupid and did not refute KK's whereabouts nor even attempt to put statements by witnesses as to her whereabouts on 11-22, in question, at the prelim.
14. Surveillance caught KB and PF at KB's home on 11-22-18, but somehow missed KK.
15. The state is willing to present a faulty case to the court, in an extremely high-profile no body case, thereby risking their careers and reputation.
The male friend KKL gave the gun to, I wonder if his DNA was excluded?KK told her ex-husband she thought someone was trying to 'set her up'.
Yep, I think we can move "PF became completely unhinged" into the "things we know" column for sure.
Nobody takes a bat to someone's head if he's even remotely "hinged"! MOO to the max!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.