CO CO - Kelsey Berreth, 29, Woodland Park, Teller County, 22 Nov 2018 - #46*ARREST*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #81
Also quoting myself just to add:

Kiln dried wood such as a bat would tend to burn completely without having to rake the ends back into the fire. None dried wood does tend to leave ends that don't burn completely bc as they burn the moisture is forced from the middle of the wood out towards the outside ends that are not in the direct heat of the fire. So many times you have to put the un burnt ends back in to the middle of the fire to completely burn them. With kiln dried lumber there is very little moisture to cause that effect hence they tend to burn completely. My own experience and general knowledge and MOO. Ok so yah about those cinnamon rolls...
Thanks for sharing the info on the bat. I enjoy reading other's input especially when it comes to something I clearly know ZERO about LOL. Wood working is an amazing talent IMO so congrats on that!

Speaking of said 'bat' IIRC KK said in the AA that she had carried an aluminum bat when she supposedly staked out KB's townhome on attempt number 2 or 3? Did it mention what happened to that bat after she aborted the mission? Is there a distinct reason we believe PF used a wooden bat verses an aluminum bat <the same KK had maybe>??

I know….I'll run and hide in the corner until the coast clears. :oops:
 
  • #82
Acoustics? I don't remember "bag" coming up until later.

Tweets during prelim hearing Thread 39, page 38:

Jennifer Kovaleski‏Verified account @JennKovaleski 2m2 minutes ago
Defense attorney: "How many photos are there of #PatrickFrazeeleaving with a black tote? Commander Adams responds: "No"

Ashley Franco‏ @AshleyKKTV 1m1 minute ago
Black tote back in examination. Large black plastic tote seen in the back of #PatrickFrazee truck. REMINDER: this tote is apparently a significant part of #KelseyBerrethdisappearance. @KKTV11News

Did the word "back" morph into "bag "?
bbm It would "appear" that's what happened and it grew some legs too :)
 
  • #83
In reference to the black plastic tote. I'm not sure it matters weather or not fluid would seep out on top of the hay bale as even with a lid most are not completely air tight. I think too much has been made weather it was a bag or a hard plastic box. Cadaver dogs are trained to hit on even the tiniest amount of sent, especially after a body has been decompossing for a few days. I don't find it unplausible that the dog would hit on that are even if there wasn't material that was left behind. MOO

I do believe that after reviewing the affidavit more closely that LE does believe it was a hard plastic tote and I think the bits of black plastic that they found at Casa de Frazee tends to support that. MOO
And weren't there other similar "totes" also at the F ranchette as well? I know I read that somewhere IIRC.
 
  • #84
Dateline NBC‏Verified account @DatelineNBC

Colorado police search landfill for missing woman Kelsey Berreth's remains https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/kelsey-berreth-case-colorado-police-search-landfill-missing-woman-s-n976586 …

D0amJ1MW0AEM3k5.jpg


Dateline NBC on Twitter
 
  • #85
Wasn't sure if you were responding but saw it below mine and it seemed to address mine.

I too look more from the prosecution side generally, however, I watched a video from a defense attorney this a.m. and he was bothered by many of the very same things and poked a lot of holes in this case when one considers this, I think most would admit, convoluted story that in some ways seems to make no sense of KK's and some other things. He was not coming down on either side, was more pro-prosecution I felt but was just going with what is out there so far as well and showing where the holes would be thus far for a defense to take up with and where they would go with it.

I think the prosecution has more than we know though (he hoped and said the same) and quite honestly I hope for a bit of a twist even where KK is concerned. Not sure that is realistic, but one can hope. We may all be surprised, who knows. This is looking like such a he said/she said though and she is already for the most part "out" of most charges, we sure do not need PF to be as well. That would be no justice at all for these victims.

It is just supposition but I feel this gun plays in, others do not. I feel it was put in for a reason but maybe it was just to confuse, strategize or they feel is is another theory or some such. Some think KK would not lie because of her deal but I can think of a few reasons she would still take the chance and lie about certain bigger things that I won't go into here.

I have hope they will find KB's remains and the other things they are looking for at the landfill. That would clearly probably corroborate something they were apparently told.

Nothing will bring the victims back but I hope all who were involved in this end up where they deserve to. And I leave open the possibility there are others but not a fact so will leave it at that.

So anyhow, thanks for the great response as well; we all want the same result I think, for the most part anyway and that is what matters. Signed by, Long Winded Me :)

jmo

I agree, My only thought about the gun and it being in the affidavit was that the prosecution wanted it out there and to make it known that they had looked into it so that the defense couldn't try to spin it. Why else would they bring it up unless they have something that tells them that it likely wasn't involved? I just can't imagine the prosecution throwing something like that out there just to help the defense estabilish that possibility? Or maybe I'm just reading to much into it?
 
Last edited:
  • #86
  • #87
I got the sense that was about his excuses for not marrying her. CB stated something about how the reason they didn't marry was the cattle market taking a nose dive. I think he made a lot of excuses.

She apparently thought they were engaged. She came from a super religious family. She probably felt a lot of pressure to be married to the father of her child.

I mean there's something quite odd in this. She felt she was engaged and had a relationship. There are indications of strain - the account of the gun incident, the reference to arguing about finances, the fact that the baby was over a year old and they still weren't married, the comment the mom says KB made about "I feel safe around PF now" or something to that effect, in relation to her gun? The hospitalization for anxiety and depression.

Yet PF never just ended the relationship and said he didn't want KB. Why? Why didn't he just say it's over? And he hid his baby from KK until last summer?

KB seems like a sweet, ambitious person. She was beautiful. Why didn't PF want her?

I note again that he's a man who apparently never moved out of his mother's home. Despite having a few adult relationships.

I mean I know they have a smallish ranch that he worked so that could explain that. Adults will stay on family farms to work them when there's a family business.

But there's something weird here I can't put my finger on exactly. Why the secrecy about not wanting to stay in the relationship with KB? Why the secrecy about the existence of his child, to KK, who he also never married and seemed to have no intention of becoming serious with?

I get this sense that he never loved any woman. That his loyalties were linked to his mother only. Until his child was born. But he kept KK as a hanger on for what she could do for him.

As to KB, maybe he knew it was odd not to want her. Maybe he was simply forestalling an official breakup for fear she would try to move back home or closer to her work with the baby.

I don't know. But it's strange how these two didn't live together and weren't married, there were some apparent difficulties but she felt comfortable enough with him to help him with his cows, to go to Thanksgiving dinner with him and to play a blindfolded candle scent game with him.

It will be interesting to hear how that's all fleshed out by prosecutors.
Yes, love this analogy!
 
  • #88
Thanks for sharing the info on the bat. I enjoy reading other's input especially when it comes to something I clearly know ZERO about LOL. Wood working is an amazing talent IMO so congrats on that!

Speaking of said 'bat' IIRC KK said in the AA that she had carried an aluminum bat when she supposedly staked out KB's townhome on attempt number 2 or 3? Did it mention what happened to that bat after she aborted the mission? Is there a distinct reason we believe PF used a wooden bat verses an aluminum bat <the same KK had maybe>??

I know….I'll run and hide in the corner until the coast clears. :oops:

I believe at some point either Slater/May had said that KK told them that PF used a wooden bat. Its either in an MSM quote or preliminary testimony....MOO
 
  • #89
As well, transfer stations do the same record keeping so, anything "dumped" at a transfer station can also be tracked when it is hauled off to the actual dump site.

I have confidence if KB's remains are at Midway, they will find them.
BBM
I felt a literal sense of hope when I read this :)
 
  • #90
Thanks for sharing the info on the bat. I enjoy reading other's input especially when it comes to something I clearly know ZERO about LOL. Wood working is an amazing talent IMO so congrats on that!

Speaking of said 'bat' IIRC KK said in the AA that she had carried an aluminum bat when she supposedly staked out KB's townhome on attempt number 2 or 3? Did it mention what happened to that bat after she aborted the mission? Is there a distinct reason we believe PF used a wooden bat verses an aluminum bat <the same KK had maybe>??

I know….I'll run and hide in the corner until the coast clears. :oops:
I will hide with you because here I go again...how did PF get the bat into KB’s townhouse?
 
  • #91
I got the sense that was about his excuses for not marrying her. CB stated something about how the reason they didn't marry was the cattle market taking a nose dive. I think he made a lot of excuses.

She apparently thought they were engaged. She came from a super religious family. She probably felt a lot of pressure to be married to the father of her child.

I mean there's something quite odd in this. She felt she was engaged and had a relationship. There are indications of strain - the account of the gun incident, the reference to arguing about finances, the fact that the baby was over a year old and they still weren't married, the comment the mom says KB made about "I feel safe around PF now" or something to that effect, in relation to her gun? The hospitalization for anxiety and depression.

Yet PF never just ended the relationship and said he didn't want KB. Why? Why didn't he just say it's over? And he hid his baby from KK until last summer?

KB seems like a sweet, ambitious person. She was beautiful. Why didn't PF want her?

I note again that he's a man who apparently never moved out of his mother's home. Despite having a few adult relationships.

I mean I know they have a smallish ranch that he worked so that could explain that. Adults will stay on family farms to work them when there's a family business.

But there's something weird here I can't put my finger on exactly. Why the secrecy about not wanting to stay in the relationship with KB? Why the secrecy about the existence of his child, to KK, who he also never married and seemed to have no intention of becoming serious with?

I get this sense that he never loved any woman. That his loyalties were linked to his mother only. Until his child was born. But he kept KK as a hanger on for what she could do for him.

As to KB, maybe he knew it was odd not to want her. Maybe he was simply forestalling an official breakup for fear she would try to move back home or closer to her work with the baby.

I don't know. But it's strange how these two didn't live together and weren't married, there were some apparent difficulties but she felt comfortable enough with him to help him with his cows, to go to Thanksgiving dinner with him and to play a blindfolded candle scent game with him.

It will be interesting to hear how that's all fleshed out by prosecutors.

bbm
And I have no doubt the defence team will help the prosecutors "flesh it out" :) It should be quite a show once it arrives.
 
  • #92
I will hide with you because here I go again...how did PF get the bat into KB’s townhouse?
I suspect KK has the answer to your question, seeing how forthcoming PF was with all the other nitty gritty details of what he did. MOO
 
  • #93
Cop testifies woman told police Colorado man beat fiancee to death with a bat


"Kenney told police that Frazee had wrapped a sweater around Berreth's head, telling her he wanted her to guess the scent of candles as a ruse, before beating her to death with a baseball bat and stashing her body on a ranch. After she cleaned the house, Kenney said she went with Frazee to retrieve Berreth's body and watched as Frazee burned it on his property along with the wooden bat, Slater said."

So per KK via Slater
 
  • #94
I got the sense that was about his excuses for not marrying her. CB stated something about how the reason they didn't marry was the cattle market taking a nose dive. I think he made a lot of excuses.

She apparently thought they were engaged. She came from a super religious family. She probably felt a lot of pressure to be married to the father of her child.

I mean there's something quite odd in this. She felt she was engaged and had a relationship. There are indications of strain - the account of the gun incident, the reference to arguing about finances, the fact that the baby was over a year old and they still weren't married, the comment the mom says KB made about "I feel safe around PF now" or something to that effect, in relation to her gun? The hospitalization for anxiety and depression.

Yet PF never just ended the relationship and said he didn't want KB. Why? Why didn't he just say it's over? And he hid his baby from KK until last summer?

KB seems like a sweet, ambitious person. She was beautiful. Why didn't PF want her?

I note again that he's a man who apparently never moved out of his mother's home. Despite having a few adult relationships.

I mean I know they have a smallish ranch that he worked so that could explain that. Adults will stay on family farms to work them when there's a family business.

But there's something weird here I can't put my finger on exactly. Why the secrecy about not wanting to stay in the relationship with KB? Why the secrecy about the existence of his child, to KK, who he also never married and seemed to have no intention of becoming serious with?

I get this sense that he never loved any woman. That his loyalties were linked to his mother only. Until his child was born. But he kept KK as a hanger on for what she could do for him.

As to KB, maybe he knew it was odd not to want her. Maybe he was simply forestalling an official breakup for fear she would try to move back home or closer to her work with the baby.

I don't know. But it's strange how these two didn't live together and weren't married, there were some apparent difficulties but she felt comfortable enough with him to help him with his cows, to go to Thanksgiving dinner with him and to play a blindfolded candle scent game with him.

It will be interesting to hear how that's all fleshed out by prosecutors.

Gitana1, I'm attaching a list of common traits held by convicted
wildfire arsonists which, while not murderers in the same sense as PF, may help us understand that many of these perps have
a lot of common life and behavioral traits.
While reading this I couldn't help but see the similarities w/PF.
There does seem to be many commonalities in criminals even
though the crimes they carry out may be different.
Skip down to the PROFILE section:
Inside an Arsonist's Mind
Even if an arsonist does have a psychiatric illness, this may not be a contributing factor in the fire-setting behavior, or may be only one of many factors. Pyromania is an established psychiatric diagnosis; however, there are very few true pyromaniacs.

NOVEMBER 19, 2007
4
Tweet
Share
Join Thousands of Fellow Followers
" data-bvo-param-description="
Login or register now to gain instant access to the rest of this premium content!

" radix-app-id="b105cce3-d815-4347-9ae4-b203d58347a4" radix-host="Radix" style="box-sizing: border-box; position: relative; float: left; width: 639.99px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Hind, sans-serif; font-size: 14.5px; letter-spacing: 0.1px; line-height: 17.4px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
The role of mental illness in arson can be complex. It is often assumed that fire-setters are mentally disturbed. Even if an arsonist does have a psychiatric illness, this may not be a contributing factor in the fire-setting behavior, or may be only one of many factors. Pyromania is an established psychiatric diagnosis; however, there are very few true pyromaniacs.

Arson is responsible for approximately 25% of all fires; more than 500,000 arson fires occur each year. Arson is the most expensive crime in America, costing more than $2 billion a year in property loss. The federal Anti-Arson Act of 1982 established arson as a violent crime. Arson claims over 700 lives annually. Arson is also a very difficult crime to solve; only 15% of arson cases are closed by arrest, and only two percent are closed by conviction. The biggest problem in solving arson is that evidence is destroyed immediately or altered significantly. Juveniles account for 55% of all arson-related arrests.

From January 1 to November 1 of this year there have been 77,279 wildfires in the United States. 9,249,328 acres have burned. Two of Southern California's 35 fires the last week of October have been officially determined to have been deliberately set, including the 25,000-acre Santiago fire in Orange County; however investigations continue.

The California Department of Forestry reported that in 2003-2004 there were 767 wildfires caused by arson, almost seven percent of the state's total wildfires. Additionally, there were 1,692 wildfires during those two years whose origin was never discovered. How many were arson? Ultimately, we may never know. The media attention devoted to catastrophic wildfires often fuels copycat arsonists.

Motives for Arson

Motive is defined as the inner drive or impulse that is the cause, reason, or incentive that induces or prompts a specific behavior. Motives for arson vary and can be abstract. Understanding why individuals set fires is paramount for any arson investigation. Arsonists tend to rationalize their crime, project external blame, and minimize the consequences. Professionals in forensic psychiatry, criminal and fire investigation have developed classifications related to the motives behind fire-setting.

  1. Excitement: The most common excitement motive is pure thrill-seeking; the suspect enjoys the chaos created by the arson. Excitement offenders may also want recognition as a hero (such as firefighter-arsonists). They crave attention and are excited by the idea that everyone is talking about and looking for them. The ability to create a situation requiring the response of the fire service and law enforcement provides these individuals with a feeling of empowerment over society. Setting an uncontrolled fire is a tremendous exercise in obtaining, demonstrating, maintaining, or acquiring lost power. There may also sexual gratification in fire-setting for some excitement arsonists. Potential targets of the excitement motivated arsonist run full scale from nuisance dumpster fires to occupied apartment buildings during the night. Targets may escalate as the fire-setting of more benign locations no longer provides enough excitement.
  2. Vandalism: Vandalism-motivated arson is defined as malicious or mischievous fire-setting that result in damage to property. Vandalism fires are most often set by juveniles for no apparent reason other than just for fun. These fires are often set by more than one individual, and may be the result of peer or group pressure. Common targets are schools, abandoned structures, and flammable vegetation.
  3. Revenge: Revenge-motivated fires are set in retaliation for some real or perceived injustice. This wrongdoing may have occurred months or years before the current fire-setting activity. Revenge-motivated arson can further be subdivided into four major types of retaliation; personal, societal, institutional, and group. Revenge is the most common motive for a serial arsonist.
  4. Crime Concealment: Arson is the secondary criminal activity in this classification category. The fire is set for the purpose of covering up primary crime(s) such as murder, burglary, auto theft, or the destruction or theft of records. The goal of concealment arson is to eliminate evidence left at a crime scene.
  5. Profit: Arsonists in this category expect profit from their fire-setting, either directly for monetary gain, or indirectly to eliminate debt. The goal is to cause the most possible damage in the least possible time. Examples of profit arson include insurance fraud, liquidating property, dissolving businesses, destroying inventory, eliminating competition, remodel old property , or to gain employment.
  6. Extremist/Terrorist: Arsonists may set fires to further their own or their group's social, political, or religious causes. Examples of extremist/terrorist motivated targets include government buildings, houses of worship, abortion clinics, slaughterhouses, animal laboratories, and furriers. The targets of political terrorists often reflect the focus of the terrorists' wrath. Terrorist arsonists frequently claim their responsibility for the fire and use media attention to draw attention to their specific cause.
  7. No discernible motive--perhaps under the influence of a mental illness: The role of mental illness in arson and fire-setting behavior can be very complex. Even if an arsonist does have a mental illness, this may not be a contributing factor in the crime. For example, a schizophrenic may set a fire out of anger and revenge; psychosis, paranoia, and delusions may or may not be contributing factors. Studies related to the prevalence of mental illness in arsonists are quite misleading related to relatively low rates of arrest and conviction.


The Truth about Pyromania

Pyromania is an established psychiatric diagnosis; however true pyromania is quite rare. The reported incidence of the disorder is less than one percent. Pyromania is a commonly used term that often arises when wildfire arson is suspected. Studies have shown that there is a great deal of misunderstanding among investigators and law enforcement officers about what pyromania really means. The term is used loosely by the media as well as the public as a fit-all label for any kind of malicious and apparently senseless fire-setting.

Pyromania falls into the diagnostic classification of impulse control disorders, along with disorders like kleptomania (stealing), intermittent explosive disorder (violent and destructive outbursts) and pathological gambling. These disorders are characterized by a failure to resist impulses, such as the impulse to light a fire. Simply, pyromania is the uncontrollable impulse to repeatedly set fires with no obvious motive (such as concealment of a crime, financial gain). A pyromaniac experiences arousal, pleasure, gratification, and/or relief when setting a fire, or when witnessing or participating in their aftermath.

Is There a Profile for an Arsonist?

Current profiles are based on the interviews with the relatively few arsonists who have been arrested. As arson motives vary greatly, profiling fire-setters is difficult. The following is a list of the most frequently documented characteristics of a wildfire arsonist; it is not representative of all fire-setters.

  • White male, age 17-26
  • Unstable childhood; often one or both parents missing from home
  • Abuse or neglect by parents
  • Childhood hyperactivity disorder
  • Poor academic performance
  • Antisocial behaviors and other crimes as an adolescent
  • Cold or aggressive relationship with father; overprotective mother
  • If married, poor marital adjustment
  • If not married, still living at home with parents
  • Lack of stable interpersonal relationships; poor social skills
  • Poor occupational adjustment; employed in low-paying jobs often as a laborer
  • Poor military performance
  • Fascination with the fire service
  • Mixed findings on intelligence, but most found to have average to higher intelligence. Although many studies have found arsonists to be of limited intelligence, this finding may be more an indication of those relatively few arsonists who are convicted than the overall arsonist population.
  • Alcoholism and/or substance abuse
  • Mental Illness: personality disorders, depression, schizophrenia, suicidal
 
  • #95
Well, since "dad with a phone" is not considered MSM (as KK can NOT speak to them), how about we send him to find KK and get her to clarify :) I need to get off this merry-go-round! Today!! :)

LOL! But then WHAT would we have left to talk about? Spiral frosted desert rolls?

Right before the last hearing the person you are referring to was added to the witness list, so I wonder if that would prevent him from speaking to any other witnesses or defendants in the case?

JMO
 
  • #96
And weren't there other similar "totes" also at the F ranchette as well? I know I read that somewhere IIRC.

I believe that was stated yes, I'l see if i can find it and link it here


Live blog: Patrick Frazee appears in court for preliminary hearing

In regards to the search of the Frazee ranch:

Slater said he didn’t see anything charred in the dirt there. He just noticed the discoloration. FBI evidence team was present. Kenney also pointed out a small red plastic gas can & totes similar to what she said Frazee used to transport Kelsey’s body.

2:46 p.m.

2:45 p.m.

At Frazee’s property, Slater said something caught his eye. In Afghanistan, he says he was trained to detect where IEDs, improvised explosive device, was. He noticed a distinct discoloration in an area that Kenney eventually pointed out as the burn area. The dirt was darker there than nearby.

2:42 p.m.

They went to Frazee’s property first that day. Kenney showed investigators where the burn was. New exhibit (#12) is a photo of an aerial view with a pin indicating where the burn area was. Again these site visits were Dec. 21. Slater says Kenney had no difficulty remembering where the burn area & Nash Ranch were.
 
Last edited:
  • #97
Cop testifies woman told police Colorado man beat fiancee to death with a bat


"Kenney told police that Frazee had wrapped a sweater around Berreth's head, telling her he wanted her to guess the scent of candles as a ruse, before beating her to death with a baseball bat and stashing her body on a ranch. After she cleaned the house, Kenney said she went with Frazee to retrieve Berreth's body and watched as Frazee burned it on his property along with the wooden bat, Slater said."

So per KK via Slater
I didn't know KK went with him to get her body. How can anybody go to a person's place, view their battered murdered body and then go with him to burn it. This is beyond anything.
 
  • #98
The article I posted above was on a Law Enforcement site,
for training purposes. From Officer.com
 
  • #99
I agree, My only thought about the gun and it being in the affidavit was that the prosecution wanted it out there and to make it known that they had looked into it so that the defense couldn't try to spin it. Why else would they bring it up unless they have something that tells them that it likely wasn't involved? I just can't imagine the prosecution throwing something like that out there just to help the defense establish that possibility? Or maybe I'm just reading to much into it?

Great thought too and just as likely. Confuse, strategize, show as you said it had been looked into? The entire MG/KK thing bothers me though too... Many questions... Another pair where we know one was willing to lie for the other, at least in the one direction, MG for KK...

Just speculating...
 
  • #100
It is in the affidavit so in the same thought process, one can discount anything in there as the majority of it is interviews of people, some of whom are known liars so who knows? So pretty much that would be true with almost anything we know in this case. Even cell phone records, video cam, etc. does not back up everything nor is probably all there yet.

It has not went to trial yet so nothing at all has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt right? So I would agree.

So that is true but we all pick and choose what we think is true on the one hand but discount what we do not on the other. Just my opinion, with all due respect.

I personally today though am starting to think the baseball bat, at least as it relates to it occurring in KB's townhome is hogwash. I may change my mind though. :)

I have a bit of trouble buying the statements of a convicted felon, particularly when they seem quite outlandish and things do not match up.

Just my opinion.
I also do not believe KB was murdered with a wooden baseball bat in the condo living room.

1. The condo is very small and tight at 742 sqft with a good part of that upstairs. An adult woman and a baby live there, so there is a significant amount of stuff. The living room area isn't even large enough for a couch but only a loveseat, per the Zillow photos. I have lived in such a space, and I would never have been able to swing a bat without taking out a lamp, TV, etc. or hitting the wall. PF is 6'2" iirc.

2. In the murder of Jason Corbett by his wife Molly Corbett and her father Thomas Martens, both a yard paving stone and a baseball bat were used to bludgeon him. The attack likely began with Jason asleep in bed in the master bedroom of a newer, larger house with a very spacious master bedroom. Molly beat Jason with the paver, mostly about the head, and then her father, a retired FBI agent with a law degree, beat Jason with the baseball bat. Not a mark on them, they claimed self defense. Jason was heavily battered. The bedroom and adjoining bathroom were a bloodbath - the heaviest blood was all LOW, all over the baseboards as Jason tried to crawl away from the assailants. There would be no way to "clean" in just 3 hours; it would need paint. JMO

GUILTY - NC - Jason Corbett, 39, murdered in his Wallburg home, 2 Aug 2015 #10

Corbett home

th
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
120
Guests online
2,180
Total visitors
2,300

Forum statistics

Threads
632,615
Messages
18,629,113
Members
243,216
Latest member
zagadka
Back
Top