What do you mean? Financially?I’ve been a member here for (guessing) almost 2 years, I’ve never needed my “ignore” button more than on this case!
*just beware, there are people trying to benefit from this tragedy all over the Internet.*![]()
What do you mean? Financially?I’ve been a member here for (guessing) almost 2 years, I’ve never needed my “ignore” button more than on this case!
*just beware, there are people trying to benefit from this tragedy all over the Internet.*![]()
How could I forget this one!! Thanks for reminding me!And then it comes out, despite his lies to the contrary, that he is indeed involved in an extra marital affair.
CW is for sure a sociopath or worse. Dupers delight in the interview. Most likely he felt euphoria after the killings and dumping their bodies. That's why he looked so rested. His only concern now is for himself. It's so strange that people like this exist. And so sad for anyone who gets mixed up with them. I don't think he drank or took drugs or ran around. No violations. How could anyone recognize his disorder?Yes we are. As is everyone.
I've seen MLM and people selling tshirts.What do you mean? Financially?
But he was running around.CW is for sure a sociopath or worse. Dupers delight in the interview. Most likely he felt euphoria after the killings and dumping their bodies. That's why he looked so rested. His only concern now is for himself. It's so strange that people like this exist. And so sad for anyone who gets mixed up with them. I don't think he drank or took drugs or ran around. No violations. How could anyone recognize his disorder?
A friend/neighbor of W family took it in temporarily until a
related family member could take it. Sounded like it was going
to be OK.
A) they weren't innocent as they were accessoriesThe Ramsey case. I think the son did it and look what the parents did to her to cover it up. IMO
What do you mean? Financially?
great post.I'm a fair minded person open to seeing things from both sides. No matter how horrific a crime is it is the duty of a jury to presume the innocence of the defendant therefore up to the prosecutor to convict by the evidence they present.
Unless the defense has some texts, letters, something tangible that prior to these murders SW herself (and can be authenticated) had threatened the lives of her children for ANY reason imo it is just his word against a woman who can no longer speak for herself. If he in fact has someone who can get on the stand under oath and swear they too heard SW make these threats against the kids that would possibly open the door to reasonable doubt. Surely if any such person exists they would certainly come forward by now to make this claim. If a person making such a claim is an immediate family member I think most people would consider the relationship factor and the position CW is now in and more then likely decide it is a family's desire to save their loved one. Also, if she did indeed make such a claim I would expect a report was made to child services as further proof this transpired. I would assume a family member would be MORE inclined to make such a report given the children are their flesh and blood and were be worried about their safety.
The other factors in this case that would not lead me to a reasonable doubt verdict is CW's actions in his confession.
**** Claiming he saw SW strangling her children and his first reaction to strangle HER. Does not even make the slightest lick of sense. I don't think anyone would buy this. A normal person would pull, shove, or lift SW away from the child she was allegedly strangling and immediately tend to the kids. Attempt CPR being the most logical step for a person even one not well versed in the procedure and or call 911 IMMEDIATELY. Neither actions were taken by him.
**** Let's give CW the benefit of the doubt, he reacted to what he witnessed and strangled his wife, did not call 911 and is now standing around with 3 dead bodies. Even AFTER they are all dead wouldn't he think to call 911 to report it. You know, for the record have the appropriate people on hand to investigate the crime scene in order to confirm HIS story. The crime scene would be fresh and more importantly, any evidence on the children that could prove his innocence would still be there. He did not do this either.
**** So we are to believe that CW having done all the above who "snapped" because his wife killed their children does a 180 and then begins to feel sorry for her, wants to get the bodies out of there to "save her reputation". He is so chiverlous to then disassemble a crime scene, move the bodies bury his wife then put his beloved daughters separately in two oil filled tanks to rot? Hmmmmmmm
**** OK, he has done all the above and is the knight in white armor here so unconcerned that his actions would lead to him being arrested, let's continue to force our common sense aside and further accept his version that he is a hero hell bent on saving his wife's reputation to spare her family and friends, AND risk him going to jail for it.
**** So Nicole unknowingly happens upon the scene because she is concerned about her friend. She states that she knew something was not right due to various factors, door locked in unusual way, car being there with kids seats now in them, no communication from her and her skipping her doctor's appointment. CW's first lie on record that they were at a friend's house. Dismissing her friends concern.
**** Goes on the air pleading for the return of his family KNOWING that can't possibly happen. Second lie on record. Why continue the act if in fact he is not guilty?? Why the continued charade. Is this not the proper time under the circumstance to fess up?
**** He confesses and now claims it was in fact SW who murdered the children she loved so dearly and he just snapped and killed her with a chain of actions outlined above.
Seriously??? ANY of this would lead an average person to find reasonable doubt? I think it is unreasonable for any average person to find ANY doubt under these circumstances.
If this charade is continued and he chooses to go to trial rather then fully confess to his actions, I do not know what the defense will put on for it's case. I am open to hearing it but again, unless there is something TANGIBLE linking SW to the murder of her children, this guy is going down for ALL the murders. Just my opinion based on what is logical to me.
I've seen MLM and people selling tshirts.
Gross.
Moo
It's hard to recognize unless you've lived with and experienced it, and even then it's near impossible for anyone with empathy to wrap their brains around the reality of it.CW is for sure a sociopath or worse. Dupers delight in the interview. Most likely he felt euphoria after the killings and dumping their bodies. That's why he looked so rested. His only concern now is for himself. It's so strange that people like this exist. And so sad for anyone who gets mixed up with them. I don't think he drank or took drugs or ran around. No violations. How could anyone recognize his disorder?
I’ve seen it too, even called the t-shirt person out.Is it to benefit the family? Who gets the money?
Whatever people may think about a woman who has an affair with a married man, she may very well be a victim here as well. Dragged into a horrible situation, that no one will ever forget. Her career at work may be destroyed, her situation in the community, affected.
Let's keep the focus on the criminal.
Or plausible!It may be allowed but that does not make it any more palatable.
I do not think the family benefits from the MLM sales, they say things like "Shannann would have wanted it".Is it to benefit the family? Who gets the money?
If he has any shame it's in being thought of as a baby killer. How people view him matters to him.The harsh reality is people abuse and kill their children and spouses everyday all the time. The reason I think the fascination with this case is they were so normal on the outside. They were living the American "Dream" get married, buy a house, have kids. It's hard for us to reconcile the evil because a lot of us can see ourselves in them. These other people who kill usually have some signs before hand, they were drug addicts, alcoholics, abused as children, had prior criminal history etc. but CW and SW so far have none of that the only known thing is he was having an affair and killed his family. Why, we will probably never know unless there are clues on cell phones and computers. He will never admit to the crimes against his children.
I've read all of the threads on this heartbreaking case but have held off of commenting because by the time I have my thoughts in order someone else has stated those same thoughts and quite eloquently.
But I'm adding this here because I don't recall this being brought up:
"Causes of death have not been released for Shanann, Bella or Celeste. But filings from prosecutors and the defense suggest at least some of them were strangled and that a “weapon” — possibly a gun — was involved."
I don't recall this mentioned elsewhere though it's very possible I missed it....And my guess is the writer took liberties with 'possibly a gun'. I do wonder if it was the method of strangulation or if it was a weapon used on SW and her unborn child.
It's from the end of this article People from August 21st.