Found Deceased CO - Shanann Watts (34), Celeste"Cece" (3) and Bella (4), Frederick, 13 Aug 2018 *Arrest* #19

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #781
I completely understand that. I would just need to know that my identity stays private.
If it eases your mind any, I know of only one verified insider EVER whose identity was revealed, and she revealed it to us herself. Tricia would never do that, nor allow it.
 
  • #782
I completely understand that. I would just need to know that my identity stays private.

No one except the admin would know your identity. None of us would.
 
  • #783
I completely understand that. I would just need to know that my identity stays private.

It would stay between you and the moderators. No one else reading these threads would know who you are.

It definitely takes the conversation here at WS up a few notches in quality by having verified insiders on the threads.
 
  • #784
If you want my honest opinion... my first thought when they went missing was “what has she done”.

Fair enough. She seems high-strung, probably OCD, and ran a tight ship, I get that. I have a friend quite like her, in that respect. My friend makes my head hurt. :) However, respectfully, that wasn't exactly my question. Once CW told his version of events, after that... Did you ever think something like "oh crap, he finally snapped"?
 
  • #785
I think we know what Trinket is implying here.
Let’s not jump on her while she is waiting to be verified. Let’s stay polite and open-minded.
Understandably, Trinket is concerned about her privacy. This is a sensitive matter & she has a controversial opinion.
I, for one, would like to hear it.
Thank
I think we know what Trinket is implying here.
Let’s not jump on her while she is waiting to be verified. Let’s stay polite and open-minded.
Understandably, Trinket is concerned about her privacy. This is a sensitive matter & she has a controversial opinion.
I, for one, would like to hear it.
Thank you. Maybe it was a mistake to get on here. I just wanted share who they really were. Not based off the perfr
I think we know what Trinket is implying here.
Let’s not jump on her while she is waiting to be verified. Let’s stay polite and open-minded.
Understandably, Trinket is concerned about her privacy. This is a sensitive matter & she has a controversial opinion.
I, for one, would like to hear it.

Thank you. I just wanted to share who they really were. It’s been very hard to read all this for the last 2 weeks. I understand if people don’t want to believe me. First and foremost I have to keep my privacy. That’s why I’m off social media
 
  • #786
The poster said their first thought when the family went missing was what has SW done.

So I simply asked for clarification since her car never left the house. So why first think what has she done. So I definitely would like clarification on what that meant.

Did the poster think she left CW while leaving behind the car and carseats?

Or did the poster think that she took the kids and did something nefarious.

Or what? So that's why I was asking them for clarification on their original thought when the family first went missing.

My understanding of that post was that she was implying SW hurt the children.
You are certainly welcome to ask questions! I just hope we can all be respectful, even to those who might have different opinions. I kind of saw a mad rush there towards our new potential VI Trinket, and used your post to jump off of. I look forward to hearing her explain her thoughts further as well.
 
  • #787
Fair enough. She seems high-strung, probably OCD, and ran a tight ship, I get that. I have a friend quite like her, in that respect. My friend makes my head hurt. :) However, respectfully, that wasn't exactly my question. Once CW told his version of events, after that... Did you ever think something like "oh crap, he finally snapped"?

No. Honestly I believed him.
 
  • #788
I think we know what Trinket is implying here.
Let’s not jump on her while she is waiting to be verified. Let’s stay polite and open-minded.
Understandably, Trinket is concerned about her privacy. This is a sensitive matter & she has a controversial opinion.
I, for one, would like to hear it.
Me too. She has valuable insight and I would love to hear it
 
  • #789
No. Honestly I believed him.

Has SW ever done anything harsh, or cruel to the girls before, that you know of? Does she seem like someone who would strangle the babies?
 
  • #790
No. Honestly I believed him.

If you don't mind my asking when you thought "what has she done" did you think it was likely she had run away with the children and left him ? If so, why did you think that was a likely scenario ?
 
  • #791
  • #792
I can say with absolute certainty there was never any domestic violence.
No you cannot say that. You can say that you never witnessed any DV, but you cannot with absolute certainty know what goes on in other's marriages.
 
  • #793
Another thing to keep in mind- nothing new has come out on this case in a while... so we are just spinning our wheels going over the same stuff.

Having someone come on here who knew CW/SW is going to open the floodgates on this thread.
 
  • #794
No. Honestly I believed him.

Sorry to ask, just need it clarifying a little more, are you saying you believe the version of events including the baby monitor, blue face, active strangling? You think SW killed her two daughters while pregnant with her third child and was subsequently murdered herself by the CW?
 
  • #795
No. Honestly I believed him.
I noticed you said "believed", past tense. Did your opinion change after it came out where he put the bodies and that he was having an affair or multiple affairs? I hope that you do become verified so that our sleuthing stays on track in the right direction!
 
  • #796
Well, we know now for sure they didn't leave through the back. He admitted he put their dead bodies in his truck and took them out via the garage.
That’s true, but the rest of it, the she shot the kids part, could be true. Highly unlikely, beyond reasonable thinking, but could be true.
 
  • #797
He would have realized that the new squeeze might not be so attracted to him if he was living in a fold up bed 1/2 kitchen unit in a long term motel.

JMO, he may have done some real big-timing to the AP to lead her to believe he was making lots of money with the MLM. I'm not entirely sure AP is the sole
reason he did this, but she could be, and they may have discussed their futures together and were very serious about one another.

JMO, from what I've seen, when young, single women get into this kind of situation with a married man, they aren't thinking that they are going to be the ones who will have to warehouse him, pay his debts, pay for his divorce, child support and alimony.

JMO, from what I've seen, the AP either knows he has the money to handle his own sh*t, because he has a high-paying job, or because the AP has been led to believe the man has the money to take care of everything.

If he was making anything at all through the MLM, it was because SW was pumping for him. If he divorced SW for AP, he was beyond done in that MLM. JMO.

And this would lead AP to realize he had lied to her. Big surprise. Cheaters lie. But for some reason, AP's often don't seem to understand this. IMO.

JMO, Amber Frey was crucified because of her involvement with SP and she may not have been his sole motive and she didn't know he was married. JMO, AP co-worker may be in for a very bumpy ride.

All JMO.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #798
Thank

Thank you. Maybe it was a mistake to get on here. I just wanted share who they really were. Not based off the perfr


Thank you. I just wanted to share who they really were. It’s been very hard to read all this for the last 2 weeks. I understand if people don’t want to believe me. First and foremost I have to keep my privacy. That’s why I’m off social media

I think it's clear that the image they had on social media wasn't all truth. We realize that she had a business and needed to tell a narrative in order to sell it.

And also, most people don't put the bad stuff on social media. And many people portray perfect lives when that's not reality.

Their lives obviously didn't end well. So clearly something was dreadfully wrong. It would be interesting to hear your perspective. Thus far verified insiders and friends in the media who've been interviewed have described extreme shock. Disbelief. Horror. And that Shanann was a warm, generous person and lived for her kids.

Chris is described as having been an involved family man and good dad. But some have described reports from Shanann of marital problems, that he had become distant and less responsive to the girls, and that she wondered if he might be cheating.

The arrest affidavit indicates he was, indeed, having an affair with a coworker. The investigators confirmed it.
 
  • #799
I’m sorry guys, I’m
Having a hard time keeping up. Very new here. Please know I am genuine and for me it took a lot of guts to get on here. I will email Tricia for verification. Although my heart races thinking my identity will be out there.
Has SW ever done anything harsh, or cruel to the girls before, that you know of? Does she seem like someone who would strangle the babies?
Before this I couldn’t see anyone doing this. I just wanted to get on here and show things are always as they seem. I can absolutely see his version of things.
 
  • #800
Another thing to keep in mind- nothing new has come out on this case in a while... so we are just spinning our wheels going over the same stuff.

Having someone come on here who knew CW/SW is going to open the floodgates on this thread.

I predict a very ugly, agonizing trial. I'm sick for Shanann's family.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
102
Guests online
1,652
Total visitors
1,754

Forum statistics

Threads
632,348
Messages
18,625,055
Members
243,098
Latest member
sbidbh
Back
Top