- Joined
- May 25, 2014
- Messages
- 1,423
- Reaction score
- 11,816
Once again, thanks MerryB! You've got a great memory. With all the threads on this case, I can't seem to go back and find anything.
You’re very welcome, my friend.

Once again, thanks MerryB! You've got a great memory. With all the threads on this case, I can't seem to go back and find anything.
That is what I am wondering. Was there big financial stress?
The ACA (Affordable Care Act), put into place March 2010, does not allow insurers to deny anyone coverage due to pre-existing conditions. Nor can they charge a higher premium for someone who does.
Because SW was a self-employed contractor/consultant she would have been eligible to enroll in a private health plan, or find coverage through the Health Insurance Market Place. Self-employed people
Federal guidelines would allow the children to remain covered under CW's group health plan through his employer.
The ACA (Affordable Care Act), put into place March 2010, does not allow insurers to deny anyone coverage due to pre-existing conditions. Nor can they charge a higher premium for someone who does.
Because SW was a self-employed contractor/consultant she would have been eligible to enroll in a private health plan, or find coverage through the Health Insurance Market Place. Self-employed people
Federal guidelines would allow the children to remain covered under CW's group health plan through his employer.
I remember
Soon after the housing market crashed, I rember the number that was reported of people in the process of foreclosure was 17 million. It took an average of two years from the time the bank declared foreclosure until they would actually take possession of a home. I have no idea what it is now. Jmo
I have a very early start tomorrow. Ugh, an appointment with the dentist.![]()
I think it is still a pretty lengthy process. If they can, banks will work to keep people in the home. As my banker family members tell me, they don't want to own a bunch of houses. There was one not far from me where the family moved out almost four years ago and the bank was just able to put that house back on the market this summer.
I believe back when we originally discussed the Watts bankruptcy, it appeared that they had maintained their mortgage payments in order to keep themselves out of foreclosure. I have assumed those payments remained the priority. Logically, the last thing you want to lose is the largest asset. Jmo.
I dont understand why they didn't just file chapter 13 in the first place. It would have helped them catch up on their mortgage payments and prevented foreclosure on their home, if they weren't able to keep up in the future. Then they could have filed chapter 7 if they needed to. Does anyone know what assets they had that were liquified and were paid off by the bank to enable them to file chapter 7 in the first place? Did they use SW's home in NC for this? When was that house sold? I'm still confused about all the details.SBM for brevity. You are correct; SW & CW filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy in 2015.
I think what the poster may have been alluding to is this: if they were in financial straights again, they would be unable to file Ch 7 because it had only been 3 years since their last bankruptcy.
I dont understand why they didn't just file chapter 13 in the first place. It would have helped them catch up on their mortgage payments and prevented foreclosure on their home, if they weren't able to keep up in the future. Then they could have filed chapter 7 if they needed to. Does anyone know what assets they had that were liquified and were paid off by the bank to enable them to file chapter 7 in the first place? Did they use SW's home in NC for this? When was that house sold? I'm still confused about all the details.
I dont understand why they didn't just file chapter 13 in the first place. It would have helped them catch up on their mortgage payments and prevented foreclosure on their home, if they weren't able to keep up in the future. Then they could have filed chapter 7 if they needed to. Does anyone know what assets they had that were liquified and were paid off by the bank to enable them to file chapter 7 in the first place? Did they use SW's home in NC for this? When was that house sold? I'm still confused about all the details.
That's why I dont what enabled them to file chapter 7 and not chapter 13. Once you file chapter 7, it wipes out all your dept assuming you have whatever assets the bank can take to cover the dept. Obviously they did not use the house. If you can't keep up with the mortgage, your stuck. The home will go into foreclosure. But if you file 13 first, you then can file 7 if you need to. But you can't do it the other way around. JmoYou are correct. Foreclosure is a surprisingly lengthy process & often takes years. I’ve dealt with it in my own neighborhood being a Board member of our HOA.
I do not know whether the Watts were able to reaffirm their debt (mortgage) in their filing. In order to keep the house, they would have to be up-to-date on any mortgage payments & not fall behind. Considering at the time of their filing they had less than $1000 in their checking accounts and less than $10 in savings, I’m not sure how they would have reaffirmed a $3000/mo. mortgage payment. That’s not to say that they didn’t, it just seems unlikely in my opinion. MOO
Did financial trouble contribute to presumed murder of pregnant Shannan Watts and two little girls?
I dont understand why they didn't just file chapter 13 in the first place. It would have helped them catch up on their mortgage payments and prevented foreclosure on their home, if they weren't able to keep up in the future. Then they could have filed chapter 7 if they needed to. Does anyone know what assets they had that were liquified and were paid off by the bank to enable them to file chapter 7 in the first place? Did they use SW's home in NC for this? When was that house sold? I'm still confused about all the details.
That's why I dont what enabled them to file chapter 7 and not chapter 13. Once you file chapter 7, it wipes out all your dept assuming you have whatever assets the bank can take to cover the dept. Obviously they did not use the house. If you can't keep up with the mortgage, your stuck. The home will go into foreclosure. But if you file 13 first, you then can file 7 if you need to. But you can't do it the other way around. Jmo
That is what I am wondering. Was there big financial stress?
Ok, so I am still wondering what was liquefied. What other assets did they have? Wouldn't it be in the report? You can't just file, have all your dept paid off, without the bank taking something. Unless there is some other way. I don't understand why they would not use the house to pay it off and then downsize. I think that's what millions of people had to do. JmoThe details are a little hazy but I believe that SW's North Carolina home was sold when they first moved out to Colorado. So it would have been several years before the 2015 bankruptcy filing. Jmo.