Found Deceased CO - Shanann Watts (34), Celeste"Cece" (3) and Bella (4), Frederick, 13 Aug 2018 *Arrest* #41

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #861
Dbm
 
Last edited:
  • #862
Any marks on his body will obviously draw scrutiny, especially with the obvious implications here.

It really could be present from any number of innocuous reasons though. Razor burn, mosquito bite, pimple, I mean there are any number of reasons why that mark could have been there.

Scott Peterson was able to kill his pregnant wife, and he apparently didn’t have a mark on his body.
Good point. Nor any search histories found regarding how to do so. Just the tides in SF bay IIRC.
 
  • #863
I feel like if he went after her in a rage like he says while she was actively strangling CeCe then he should definitely have defense marks on him. They would have both been in a rage and it would have been sudden and manic and a free for all. If he doesn’t, it leads me to think he may have done it while she was sleeping or in a more vulnerable position like from behind during a sneak attack. If he did it suddenly from behind I would still think he would have nail marks at least on his hands and maybe face. That’s why I think it’s more likely he sat on her while she was sleeping and her arms were pinned down. But yes we don’t know if he has injuries under his clothing.
LE certainly would have photographed his body in an effort to document marks.

I absolutely agree, if this event occurred in the way that he claims it did, there would be evidence of it on his body. She would have clawed, kicked, and perhaps bitten him.

No marks, is a strong indicator that she was caught off guard, and she never had a chance to fight back.

That’s exactly what happened.
 
  • #863
Did that idea really only originate from me? I mean, I didn't hear it anywhere else first but I can't possibly be the only person to consider it.

To be clear, though, I'm not saying that I THINK it's reasonable or loving or symbolic, I'm suggesting it MAY HAVE BEEN for CW.

Who knows. These killers are obviously not thinking like the rest of us. There was that killer that put a triangle shaped rock ( was it triangle? I forget) on his victims.

The Hillside Stranglers liked to display their victims by the side of highways or roads.

Really, who knows what they think. Hopefully,,there will be those that study them so we learn more about how they come to be.
 
  • #864
Just my own issue, but I’m still stuck on The lack of bruising or any kind of injuries on CW. There was that little red spot on his neck, but that’s it. Also, in the porch video, he was holding his arms close to his body, one in particular. Man, my eyes were glued to that one motionless arm because I was sure he injured it during the murders. Then at the end, he gestures with it, seemingly painlessly. So maybe it was just a defensive posture or “holding himself together”.

And this is my long-winded way of wondering if he had drugged the kids and Shanann, so he could kill them without resistance. Even if he ambushed shanann from behind, she would still struggle and inflict SOME kind of injury.

JMO

I suppose we have to wait for toxicology.

I noticed his arm muscles twitched a few times during that interview. I think he held that position to keep his anger about any questions in check (such as when they asked if he was a suspect). JMO.

I think for Shanann he would have to pin her arms down or else she would claw his hands and arms with her long nails. I think she was in bed on her back and he was straddling her, holding her arms at her side with his knees. That would leave both his hands free to choke her. :mad:
MOO.
 
  • #865
LE certainly would have photographed his body in an effort to document marks.

I absolutely agree, if this event occurred in the way that he claims it did, there would be evidence of it on his body. She would have clawed, kicked, and perhaps bitten him.

No marks, is a strong indicator that she was caught off guard, and she never had a chance to fight back.

That’s exactly what happened.
Yes sadly there was no warning signs leading up to this and she was 100% caught off guard. Poor SW had no chance IMO :(
 
  • #866
Good point. Nor any search histories found regarding how to do so. Just the tides in SF bay IIRC.
Exactly. SP literally put himself at the dumpsite, many miles from their house.

What are the odds that a stranger kidnaps your wife and dumps her in the same body of water where you admitted “fishing” on the day in question?

Anyone who questions his guilt, has to keep that in mind.

He was checking the tides allright.
 
Last edited:
  • #867
Exactly. SP literally put himself at the dumpsite, many miles from their house.

What are the odds that a stranger kidnaps your wife and dumps her in the same body of water where you admitted “fishing” on the day in question?

Anyone who questions his guilt, has to keep that in mind.

He was checking the tides all right.
They always have an excuse, however! IIRC, defense claims that the "kidnappers" heard he was boating that day so they dumped her body there later! Always SOMETHING for people to hold onto if they want to believe innocence, IMO. We see that in every case, including here.
 
  • #868
I believe cell phone records are also going to tell us a lot. Her cell phone being found between cushions could mean maybe she laid there. Could be a text from CW saying girls and I are a sleep in our bed please don't wake us and sleep in the lounge. Who the heck knows really but the cell phone records I feel are going to give us loads of information and I also feel will help show premeditation on CW part.
I don't feel there was much of a struggle at all. Trying to think back to the first time my ex attacked me and how I reacted but I can't for the life of me remember.
 
  • #869
Interesting re Scott P. Hiding his self. Makes sense.

Any info like that on any of the other killers?

Infants learn to quit crying when no one answers their cries. It used to be, and still is with some people, thought that babies should not be responded to. It spoils them.

The interactions babies learn are very interesting. There are many studies about parental interaction even at the smallest levels of eye movements.

I wonder if anyone will study the FA so there are more clues to pathology.


Interesting. I wonder about CW's childhood.

It was mentioned in one of Shanann's videos that she used a sleep training method for the girls, maybe smartbaby?
 
  • #870
It really could be present from any number of innocuous reasons though. Razor burn, mosquito bite, pimple, I mean there are any number of reasons why that mark could have been there.

Yes of course. I just mentioned what it looked like to me. In my opinion this *could* be a fighting sign. But it wouldn't suprise me if he had just cut himself while shaving his beard or whatever. ;)
 
  • #871
MOD NOTE

Astrology, tarot card readings, and other mystical or occult/paranormal ideas are not allowed for discussion on WS. Please have these kinds of conversations through private messaging and not on the open thread.

Thank you!
 
  • #872
LE certainly would have photographed his body in an effort to document marks.

I absolutely agree, if this event occurred in the way that he claims it did, there would be evidence of it on his body. She would have clawed, kicked, and perhaps bitten him.

No marks, is a strong indicator that she was caught off guard, and she never had a chance to fight back.

That’s exactly what happened.

I wonder if SW's previous surgery/procedure on her neck made her more vulnerable to a sudden trauma in that area, perhaps leading to a partial paralysis? That might explain lack of any obvious defensive injuries on CW.
 
  • #873
Yes!! I was just thinking about that last night! How he misused the word inclination.
Definition:
1.
a person's natural tendency or urge to act or feel in a particular way; a disposition or propensity.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, Marli61!! I hope it's a great one!
 
  • #874
I wonder if SW's previous surgery/procedure on her neck made her more vulnerable to a sudden trauma in that area, perhaps leading to a partial paralysis? That might explain lack of any obvious defensive injuries on CW.
It’s certainly possible.

If this went down like I think it went down, she wouldn’t have had a chance anyway.

A much stronger man utilizing the element of surprise, is a powerful foe.
 
  • #875
Did that idea really only originate from me? I mean, I didn't hear it anywhere else first but I can't possibly be the only person to consider it.

To be clear, though, I'm not saying that I THINK it's reasonable or loving or symbolic, I'm suggesting it MAY HAVE BEEN for CW.

FWIW I understand what you mean. A lot of murderers do odd things and have strange rituals.

Once he went through with his rage killing and was disposing of his family’s dead bodies, who knows what was going through his sick mind? Especially that 40 minute drive. I would pay big to be able to hear a running podcast of what was going through his mind on that drive.

I’m not sure I agree with the theory, especially if he had to manipulate their poor little bodies to get them in there. But I wouldn’t put anything past him both mentally and as some sort of warped defense.
 
  • #876
Interesting re Scott P. Hiding his self. Makes sense.

Any info like that on any of the other killers?

Infants learn to quit crying when no one answers their cries. It used to be, and still is with some people, thought that babies should not be responded to. It spoils them.

The interactions babies learn are very interesting. There are many studies about parental interaction even at the smallest levels of eye movements.

I wonder if anyone will study the FA so there are more clues to pathology.

I don't think anyone will. It's too rare a phenomena to be worthy of study. Especially when issues like schizophrenia, bi polar disorder and personality disorders need so much study.

And the thing is, IMO, as much as people desperately want there to be signs so that people can beware of the potential of something like this happening, I don't see anything super concrete emerging.

The general characteristics of a family annihilator may help us determine the likelihood as to whether someone whose family has already been murdered, fits the profile of an annihilator, despite looking like a normal, nice guy.

But I don't think those same characterics can really help us determine whether the person sleeping next to us has the propensity to become a monster.

It's all so subtle, really. There are millions of introverts who are devoted family men, with no criminal or mental health histories, who don't have a lot of close friends and aren't great with women, etc., who come from family dysfunction, who have a secret and are unsatisfied with their lives, but will never kill anyone.

I mean we have stronger "clues" or cues or signs with mass shooters and yet that still can't be predicted with any reliability or prevented typically. Because there are tons of resentful loners who stockpile guns or weapons, can't get women, have neurological and/or psychological issues, feel entitled to more and are drawn to violent or hateful ideologies, and spend time saying weird things on the internet, but who never do one violent thing in their lives.

Its incredibly interesting to me but I don't think we will get any answers.
 
  • #877
  • #878
Symbolic and loving? Wow that’s pretty sick. Was that from a “devils advocate” talking head or a guest comment on AB? Even if he didn’t kill them (which he did) putting them in oil tanks is the opposite of loving and I can’t imagine what’s symbolic about it. I can’t imagine anyone thinking those babies being in crude oil was in any way a positive thing. This is a perfect example of bending over backgrounds to make every excuse for this man.

I'm not sure where it originated but it was being discussed here sometime before we found out the 8 inch hatch size. A few might have changed their minds after realizing CW might have had to contort their little bodies and break bones to get them into the tanks. And I agree, it takes a sick mind to try to make that into a loving gesture. :mad::(


Did that idea really only originate from me? I mean, I didn't hear it anywhere else first but I can't possibly be the only person to consider it.

To be clear, though, I'm not saying that I THINK it's reasonable or loving or symbolic, I'm suggesting it MAY HAVE BEEN for CW.


Just so we're all clear, the "sick mind" comment(s) surely weren't referring to me? I hope not! :)
 
  • #879
LE certainly would have photographed his body in an effort to document marks.

I absolutely agree, if this event occurred in the way that he claims it did, there would be evidence of it on his body. She would have clawed, kicked, and perhaps bitten him.

No marks, is a strong indicator that she was caught off guard, and she never had a chance to fight back.

That’s exactly what happened.
Yes, I wonder if SW will have any broken nails? I agree any lack of wounds on either of them will not support his story. Of course we do not know what details he gave LE after speaking with his dad, he may have described a brawl.
 
  • #880
I don't think anyone will. It's too rare a phenomena to be worthy of study. Especially when issues like schizophrenia, bi polar disorder and personality disorders need so much study.

And the thing is, IMO, as much as people desperately want there to be signs so that people can beware of the potential of something like this happening, I don't see anything super concrete emerging.

The general characteristics of a family annihilator may help us determine the likelihood as to whether someone whose family has already been murdered, fits the profile of an annihilator, despite looking like a normal, nice guy.

But I don't think those same characterics can really help us determine whether the person sleeping next to us has the propensity to become a monster.

It's all so subtle, really. There are millions of introverts who are devoted family men, with no criminal or mental health histories, who don't have a lot of close friends and aren't great with women, etc., who come from family dysfunction, who have a secret and are unsatisfied with their lives, but will never kill anyone.

I mean we have stronger "clues" or cues or signs with mass shooters and yet that still can't be predicted with any reliability or prevented typically. Because there are tons of resentful loners who stockpile guns or weapons, can't get women, have neurological and/or psychological issues, feel entitled to more and are drawn to violent or hateful ideologies, and spend time saying weird things on the internet, but who never do one violent thing in their lives.

Its incredibly interesting to me but I don't think we will get any answers.

Good points. I know people I have diagnosed as psycopaths and sociopaths. I have no credentials to do so, but I know I am right,

I do not want to know any FA in real life. No thank you very much. But I would like to see some analysis of their early lives . Hard to do in retrospect though.

It sounds like Scott P has the most indepth study? Do you or anyone have a book to recommend about him?

It seems this type of FA has a lot of similarities whereas to me, Casey Anthony is more of a “one of”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
78
Guests online
1,523
Total visitors
1,601

Forum statistics

Threads
632,423
Messages
18,626,364
Members
243,148
Latest member
ayuuuiiix
Back
Top