- Joined
- Oct 5, 2018
- Messages
- 112
- Reaction score
- 889
That was his way of supporting her, her wants and her dreams with Thrive.
jmo
CW rarely said no to SW because he had no testicular fortitude. He is a definite "Yes, Dear" kinda loser.
That was his way of supporting her, her wants and her dreams with Thrive.
jmo
I'm thinking he said that right? But the very next day he gave interviews and all cleaned up and smiling! I have a really hard time relating to that with the circumstances he knew of! Personally I think to give interviews was foolish of him and then with his demeanor.I'm not saying what he did was right. Like I said in another post his actions afterwards don't make sense. I think it's possible he thought he was going to get blamed for killing all of them and disposed of them to avoid all of this.
jmo
CW rarely said no to SW because he had no testicular fortitude. He is a definite "Yes, Dear" kinda loser.
He wants everyone to believe he killed only SW, not the children, and he killed her in a fit of rage that would carry a manslaughter charge, not First Degree Murder, but he thought everyone would blame him for all 3 murders, so he hid their bodies hoping everyone would believe SW took off with the children to build a new life.If CW was SO enraged seeing SW strangling the girls (that he murdered SW) ... MURDERED! ... why in the hell would he care one bit about preserving her reputation and dumping/hiding the bodies. Rather, I guess I should ask, what is his reason for dumping/hiding the bodies? That in a fit of rage he just lost it, panicked, and said to himself ... ‘no one will believe me, I have to dump them all’? I see no reason he can give that will fly, eapecially with his behavior after Monday.
I'm thinking he said that right? But the very next day he gave interviews and all cleaned up and smiling! I have a really hard time relating to that with the circumstances he knew of! Personally I think to give interviews was foolish of him and then with his demeanor.
Not for the prosecution.The interviews were definitely a bad idea......
I agree. His actions don’t make sense and in fact, they indicate that he is guilty as sin. No loving father could possibly witness the murders of his 3 and 4-year-old daughters, load their bodies up within an hour or so, cram those little bodies down into tanks of crude oil – one after the other, and 12 hours later put on an act for law enforcement at the wellness check. No signs of grief. Just a whole lotta lies.I'm not saying what he did was right. Like I said in another post his actions afterwards don't make sense. I think it's possible he thought he was going to get blamed for killing all of them and disposed of them to avoid all of this.
jmo
I agree. His actions don’t make sense and in fact, they indicate that he is guilty as sin. No loving father could possibly witness the murder of his 3 and 4-year-old daughters, load their bodies up within an hour or so, cram those little bodies down into tanks of crude oil – one after the other, and 12 hours later put on an act for law enforcement at the wellness check. No signs of grief. Just a whole lotta lies.
MOO
Every couple has their own dynamics. Imo there's usually one that is more the leader than the other but hopefully there's give and take on both sides. I think a question of their dynamics is whether or not CW felt he could simply take the position of asking for a divorce or going to the extreme and murdering his family to get out. Of course there could be other reasons too (ie financial) where asking for a divorce didn't seem viable to CW.If the roles were reversed what would you think of him or her?
The interviews were definitely a bad idea......
While I don't feel I can diagnose whatever might be wrong with CW, I totally agree with you about wanting to hear the things he said to his family and the AP regarding SW.
I suspect that at the beginning of their relationship CW was attracted to her outgoing and take charge nature but eventually came to resent it quite deeply. Instead of talking to her about what he was feeling, it seems likely he expressed those things to others while pretending everything was hunky dory at home, at least for a time. That is certainly the impression I formed from information via one of our VI's who knew them both.
I also think we'll probably be hearing from some of those people at trial if the defense strategy includes attempting to lay the blame for this at SW's feet. Jmo.
If CW was making all the decisions and SW blindly agreed, she would be a doormat.If the roles were reversed what would you think of him or her?
Do you have evidence to back this up or did you simply forget to include a JMO or other such disclaimer? TIA.CW rarely said no to SW because he had no testicular fortitude. He is a definite "Yes, Dear" kinda loser.
Agreed!!Not for the prosecution.
It's JMODo you have evidence to back this up or did you simply forget to include a JMO or other such disclaimer? TIA.
I agree. Just watching his interview again made his guilt so evident, imo. If you didn’t know that he was the suspect, you’d think he was one of the neighbors just chiming in on the details. Showered, shaved, proud of his new T-shirt, anxiously awaiting the next question with almost a “go ahead, ask me anything” kind of attitude, appearing so relaxed except for his defensive crossed arms. For any human being to have gone through what he claims he went through just two days ago, there is no way an innocent person could act the way he did, IMO.I'm thinking he said that right? But the very next day he gave interviews and all cleaned up and smiling! I have a really hard time relating to that with the circumstances he knew of! Personally I think to give interviews was foolish of him and then with his demeanor.