Don't mind me, I just wanted to get this off my chest.
I've recently seen folks claiming that the inmate killed his family in a rage who are STILL looking to SW for what triggered all of this.
Some are them are using the SAME arguments that were used by folks who believed that SW killed her babies in a rage, like saying how SW would've had a more difficult transition in a divorce, etc.
How does that make any sense?
They also say they just want to learn from this to protect children in the future.
How does second guessing SW help?
He never even asked her for a divorce or a separation.
Was she supposed anticipate that he might become a family annihilator and say something like this?:
"Dear Chris, If we divorce in the future, I promise not to make any claims on you for child support, daycare and medical expenses. You can even keep all of the proceeds from the house for yourself. Also, if you lied to your mistress about being in the final stages of divorce, I will tell her it was all my fault and make things right for you both." *not SW's words - all made up by me to make a point
What if he just no longer wanted to be a dad to Bella, Cece and Niko, but he didn't want to be the jerk who left his pregnant wife and little girls?
What was she supposed to do exactly to prevent him from killing his family to get a fresh start for himself?
OR maybe, just maybe, we should only look to the monster himself, along with the toxic Watts family for answers.