Maybe it had not been going on, but was being researched.IDK but the communication they did include in the discovery docs indicates (both, her e-mails and messages exchanged with Charlotte) to me indicate this was fresh and not going on for months.
Maybe it had not been going on, but was being researched.IDK but the communication they did include in the discovery docs indicates (both, her e-mails and messages exchanged with Charlotte) to me indicate this was fresh and not going on for months.
It's 2018, nearly 2019. This was a tech-savvy gal, her job showed that. No one jumps so enthusiastically into constant texting, phoning, and facetiming a new married boyfriend without also being tech-oriented into FB, IG, all the rest. Anyway, whatever happened to the statements made here and all over the place that she did have her own FB but deleted it? Did that turn out to be false?I personally don't believe it matters one way or another but I think it would be easy for her to know SW was pregnant. There was a public video on facebook of her telling Chris and many other posts about it. My guess is that if you are seeing a married man (whether or not he says he is in the middle of a divorce) you would definitely look up the wife.
Yes, it all leaves room for speculation, I agree. Maybe she knew, maybe she didn’t. Maybe she did google her and ended up reading a Thrive article about her or she found her address. Maybe she found out SW was pregnant before the murder took place, maybe she just looked at some of her pictures randomly. We just don’t know.I personally don't believe it matters one way or another but I think it would be easy for her to know SW was pregnant. There was a public video on facebook of her telling Chris and many other posts about it. My guess is that if you are seeing a married man (whether or not he says he is in the middle of a divorce) you would definitely look up the wife.
The assumption that she googled the wife of her lover is based on her own behavior, not mine. ie prolific texting, facetiming, phoning, googling wedding gowns, googling how much Amber made, and how to perform various sex acts......there is nothing to lead me to believe she didn't bother to google the wife of her boyfriend. She sure took time to criticize SW, how did she know "the girl was always on her phone"? Why would CW tell her something like that? She claimed that CW never criticized SW.Yes, it all leaves room for speculation, I agree. Maybe she knew, maybe she didn’t. Maybe she did google her and ended up reading a Thrive article about her or she found her address. Maybe she found out SW was pregnant before the murder took place, maybe she just looked at some of her pictures randomly. We just don’t know.
If I‘ve learned one thing in life, it is to never make assumptions about how someone else is supposed to act based on how I would act. If everyone one acts the way I would do, I guess (hope?) we wouldn’t be discussing murder cases here on WS.
Yes, it’s possible, for sure. But it works both ways: if your assumption is true, you could also expect she had to have googled ”mistress of a married man, wife is pregnant” or ”man lied to me about pregnancy of his wife” or any other related Google search. There was nothing like that.The assumption that she googled the wife of her lover is based on her own behavior, not mine. ie prolific texting, facetiming, phoning, googling wedding gowns, googling how much Amber made, and how to perform various sex acts......there is nothing to lead me to believe she didn't bother to google the wife of her boyfriend. She sure took time to criticize SW, how did she know "the girl was always on her phone"? Why would CW tell her something like that? She claimed that CW never criticized SW.
I think that anyone who listened to her interviews, including her additions via telephone would know that she googled/facebooked Shan'ann. The girl was picking out wedding dresses for Pete's sake. She had it all planned, even asking Shan'ann's husband if he wanted a 3 bedroom apartment. And how she would teach Shan'ann's little girls how to paint flower pots. 3 bedrooms? Nah, she hardly knew him.If I had any questions or hesitations or suspicions that this guy I'm dating is still legally married, but separated, I would get on FB -- if I used it, but I don't -- or somewhere, anywhere to make sure this guy was on the level. I might try to check around the workplace as well.
Many of us, I'm guessing, have known someone who is dating someone who is still married with no plans to separate but tells a different story. I would want to know. I would say that IMO, she would be foolish not to check around. IMO, too, he doesn't lie too well, and she might have been suspicious. That they still were in the same house wold certainly raise my hackles...
I think that anyone who listened to her interviews, including her additions via telephone would know that she googled/facebooked Shan'ann. The girl was picking out wedding dresses for Pete's sake. She had it all planned, even asking Shan'ann's husband if he wanted a 3 bedroom apartment. And how she would teach Shan'ann's little girls how to paint flower pots. 3 bedrooms? Nah, she hardly knew him.
LOL! I had no idea. I did have a friend who once told me he could fool a polygraph with a tack in his hand, to cause pain. Never figured that one out. Also, you don't hear much about Voice Stress Analyzers anymore. They were supposed to be very accurate.
Another sign of her character, to me, is going INTO the family home . . . twice. Unless the dude is moving out, she had no business in there . . . whether separated or almost divorced.
I do wonder what his feelings are now about what he has done since being convicted.
Why are some posts showing up in brackets?
Thank you for the explanation. I thought it was a glitch.(I assume you’re referring to my post above? I use brackets to indicate a conversational tone, as such.)
Whoa...when was this? Do you have a link?
I'm a huge believer in the paranormal so this piqued my interest.
If you’re interested in something weird, check out 12minutes31seconds in this video, where there’s a distinct child’s laugh in the closet that freaks out the investigator and dog handler. Now I’m not saying it is paranormal, but I am saying it’s creepy! The investigator searched for a toy that could be the culprit, but couldn’t find anything. Status: unresolved..