- Joined
- Mar 29, 2016
- Messages
- 2,653
- Reaction score
- 64,458
I, and anyone who is placed under arrest in this country, wants and needs the best defense attorney they can get who will fight for us with all the power allowed by law to ensure we get a fair trial. Any prosecutor who is worth his salt should be up to the task of proving his case.If they don't do everything they can, then they run the risk of an appeal for ineffective assistance of counsel.
What is troubling to me is that in recent years we are seeing more and more instances of high powered defense attorneys trying to prevent a jury from hearing legally obtained evidence including digital forensics evidence which may point to the guilt of the accused. These defense attorneys are removing from the jury their ability to reach a proper verdict based on available evidence and they are doing it before the trial even starts.
The other superfluous motions raised by the defense, (how BM may be addressed, not pointing at the defendant, etc, etc, etc) serve to bog down the court and derail a legitimate prosecution by crippling their ability to properly prepare and present their case. We have less than 2 weeks until trial and the prosecution does not know what evidence they will be allowed to use.
These are the ultimate games of gotcha and smoke and mirrors and should not be compared to legitimate defense tactics.
For the very reason you have stated, @Kristin Esq. , courts are reluctant to reign in some of these defense attorneys because they don’t want to run the risk of appeal. This doesn’t have anything to do with the victim or the defense, it’s all about the judge.
A judge doesn’t need to worry about overturned and/or appealed cases if they run their courtroom properly and know the law.