- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 45,177
- Reaction score
- 463,619
Intent to Sue letters are pretty common, especially for police departments and individual officers. They are required by most states to be sent within a certain time period to preserve the right to sue public entities and/or their employees.
IMO an intent to sue letter is not going to cause a long-time detective with a state agency bringing home a good salary, benefits and retirement to suddenly resign.
While Intent to Sue letters may be common, this example is not so common. Perhaps OP is unaware that effective last year, Colorado is the only state to completely bar the legal defense for officers. Colorado is serving as the litmus test for the alarming predictions by police nationwide that eliminating qualified immunity would severely hamper their profession. In comparison, among the seven qualified-immunity bills that became law late last year, Iowa actually strengthened qualified-immunity rights of its officers, and Arkansas did so for its college and university police officers.
In other words, I don't doubt the BM's civil team would like nothing more than to make an example out to Joseph Cahill in their suit against prosecutors and investigators alleging unlawful arrest, malicious prosecution, and defamation. To be clear, I'm not citing this lawsuit as Cahill's reason for resigning but I don't think the new law specific to Colorado can be dismissed as nothing to see here. MOO
https://www.thedenverchannel.com/ne...rphew-intend-to-sue-prosecutors-investigators
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...e546bc-0cdf-11ec-aea1-42a8138f132a_story.html