The jury may be most curious about BM having access to tranq meds when in CO. He breaks so many seemingly small infractions but they're rules and laws.
The jury may be most interested in Suzanne's missing medications, if they are certainly gone.
There is a mountain of circumstantial evidence.
A broken gun for shooting tranq darts is inoperable. That tells us either BM had another weapon that would use the .22 and fire the tranq or he used duck duct tape so the broken weapon could fire. No. BM did not rely upon a broken gun for this important self assigned assassination of Suzanne. Could have been a loaded syringe with unknown medication. BM admits to having a firearm in his hand on SAT.
We just do not know how BM killed her; yet, we can rebut and speculate on multiple facets and things he may have done, all within reason, using evidence of specific particulars as part of their story.
Dart
Parts of the dart, the needle sheath, the brochure, the inoperable gun, the tranq materials dumped, BM saying he shot tranq in APR, BM shot tranq into deers in order to saw off their antlers to turn a profit are certainly an important part of their, the Morphew's, story.
BM admits to Grusing the tranq med was likely on his WorkBench. Were all of BMs tranq meds discarded in Broomfield (Broomsfield - w/ an s to lol at BM)? Wasn't there a small packet of the darts in the garage?
It is not a long walk to carry a loaded dart with its needle sheath inside short's pocket if you're considering using it on your wife within the afternoon or next few moments. Whether indoors or outdoors, or even if from the garage trucking it, as his pocket's are full of tranq stuff, into the home or racing to the backyard from where the materials originated on the garage's workbench, BM had access to the tranq material on Saturday.
BM took time to load at least one syringe or already had one ready. This is imperative premeditation opps the state could be losing.
BM trusted his sights. He'd taken shots like this a thousand times before. Murder in the Wild. Dart guns are v good up to 30' distance away. Barry could aim for her tush or a bicep. If so, Suzanne stumbled as the meds began to take effect. She cannot reach the placement of the dart in her tush.
The tranquilizer medicine enters the body instantly! By the time one could remove it, it has begun to work. She runs but she's unsteady, almost falling. She ran for her bedroom to lock the door but she's becoming dizzy, light-headed.
When BM busted in the solid cedar doorframe, fracturing it and leaving a 13" crack or more. When he found his wife huddling, perhaps whimpering, Suzanne had one more thing to say:
She scratched his arm raw, leaving those three reddish wide lines of injuries, left by Suzanne's manicured nails.
.
As others have stated - Just Wow ! Talk about predjudical on the judge's part towards the prosecution - if he does not back off on the ruling re expert testimoney in some fashion I really think the prosecution will appeal. Even the judge's selection of adjectives describing the prosectution seem over the top and not even handed. "Scathing rebuke" I think equals - the judge went too far IMO
If the Prosecution feels railroaded into a cornered position or stymied without their Experts, perhaps light dusting for the severe punishment falls on their doorstep. Whereas, if they aren't 85% + confidant of a guilty verdict without Experts, I feel the DAs Office should file an Appeal to a Higher Court on the dismissal of 12 out of 14 Expert witnesses being stricken.
There is no need to unfairly tie the state's hands by not utilizing Experts in a Murder1 trial. The sanctions are to punish Team DA not exonerate all pertinent evidence against BM. And, while they are with a Superior Court Judge, ask him to overrule the dismissal of DV which is a prevalent thread throughout the Morphew journey while in and from IN leading up to the death in CO of Suzanne within 2 short years.
DV real life examples should be tolerated in the courtroom testimony if the witness sticks to facts. Who can testify about the gun to his head, her pinned down to the bed, or threatening to not provide medical insurance? Aren't these incidents documented in her historical texting.
.
