Found Deceased CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w/o Prejudice* #101

[jakat]

I'd forgotten about this! Does this refer to BM trying to bribe someone, and do we know who it was?

Tuesday’s filing lists eight public servants he is accused of trying to influence. The individuals include three agents with the Colorado Bureau of Investigation – Robin Burgess, Joseph Cahill, and Derek Graham – an FBI agent, Jonathan Grusing; a Chaffee County Sheriff’s Deputy Lamine Mullenax; and the chief investigator with the 11th Judicial District Attorney’s Office, Alexander Walker. Two individuals whose positions are not known – Damon Brown and Kenneth Harris – were also listed in the court filing.

https://www.thedenverchannel.com/ne...ng-with-deceased-body-in-suzanne-morphew-case

 

[jakat]

Wow, our zoo is famous! I must immediately go and let them all know!

Some of the animals might be ready to join the circus, but they need a ringmaster or a ringmistress. Maybe one of each. Who might that be?

 

[GatorFL]

Terminology hacked or broadcast doesn’t really matter. If it was broadcast in any form by any means it was contempt of court and the judge decided to stop that activity from occurring going forward.

Then the order from the judge was correct. I disagree with @Seattle1's statement that he exercised poor judgement. After all, if the court feed ended up here on WS, there were people that were not following Colorado law.

 

[GatorFL]

You are correct @rainbowshummingbird there was no hacking or broadcasting from the court ever found. A site that claimed to have it live streamed was posted here and deleted. The site was some bogus clickbait - it did not have the proceeding. IIRC

Then why was it deleted?

 

[scapa]

Then why was it deleted?

I think the answer to your query is in the post you cited:

The site was some bogus clickbait - it did not have the proceeding. IIRC

Hence, not approved per WS ToS.

I feel like we're straying from the point seemingly at issue here, whether or not Judge Lama's rulings and consequent sanctions were fair or not. In this case, the defence's assertion of a hacked WebEx link became the spur for the "silent court" ruling. The link wasn't hacked but the ruling stayed in place, and the public's access to proceedings was significantly impacted. Was the ruling then an overreaction to a ruse by the defence, or a wise precaution?

I have no particular skin in the game but it did seem at times that Lama was being "led" by the defence team in ways that were surprising for an experienced trial judge. Then again, a good D team presumably aims to lead a judge and jury and a good prosecution team aims to counter that.

JMO

 

[crhedBngr]

RSBM
Yes, he'll be struck down by a bolt of lightning.

That would be lovely!

JMVHO.

 

[GatorFL]

I think the answer to your query is in the post you cited:

The site was some bogus clickbait - it did not have the proceeding. IIRC

Hence, not approved per WS ToS.

I feel like we're straying from the point seemingly at issue here, whether or not Judge Lama's rulings and consequent sanctions were fair or not. In this case, the defence's assertion of a hacked WebEx link became the spur for the "silent court" ruling. The link wasn't hacked but the ruling stayed in place, and the public's access to proceedings was significantly impacted. Was the ruling then an overreaction to a ruse by the defence, or a wise precaution?

I have no particular skin in the game but it did seem at times that Lama was being "led" by the defence team in ways that were surprising for an experienced trial judge. Then again, a good D team presumably aims to lead a judge and jury and a good prosecution team aims to counter that.

JMO

I never watched it but I assumed it showed the trial. Here a quote of the removal post:
<modsnip: This post has been removed. It is a violation of the law to broadcast this recording.>

ADMIN NOTE:

Thanks to Seattle1, a reminder that Colorado Court has strict policy that court proceedings including WEBEX cannot be filmed/recorded/rebroadcast or face contempt charges.

I agree, Eytan was just doing her job.

 

[waldojabba]

Then why was it deleted?

Simple answer. It was not MSM. I actually found it over on twitter after it was deleted.

 

[GatorFL]

Simple answer. It was not MSM. I actually found it over on twitter after it was deleted.

So the Mod's explanation was wrong?

And you've confirmed a prohibited video existed of the court procedure. The judge was 100% correct.

 

[Auntie Cipation]

Simple answer. It was not MSM. I actually found it over on twitter after it was deleted.

But did it actually show unauthorized audio or video of the court proceeding?

 

[Lyanna]

so probably wishful thinking that he will stay in the area and keep searching.

Rsbm

Wishful thinking he did this at all, never mind continuing to do so. Moo

 

[GatorFL]

Really interesting reading here at this link: Authorities "close" to finding missing mom's body; charges against husband dismissed

 

[waldojabba]

So the Mod's explanation was wrong?

And you've confirmed a prohibited video existed of the court procedure. The judge was 100% correct.

As stated earlier the video was click bait. It pretended to be a live stream but Was Not A Livestream of the court proceeding or broadcast of the court proceeding or a hack of the court proceeding. I am sorry if that was not clear to you earlier I hope I have cleared up any confusion !

 

[Cindizzi]

I never watched it but I assumed it showed the trial. Here a quote of the removal post:
<modsnip: This post has been removed. It is a violation of the law to broadcast this recording.>

ADMIN NOTE:

Thanks to Seattle1, a reminder that Colorado Court has strict policy that court proceedings including WEBEX cannot be filmed/recorded/rebroadcast or face contempt charges.

I agree, Eytan was just doing her job.

The post you are referencing by a Mod is Post #3 and it’s on Page 1 of every thread since it was originally posted on September 29, 2021.
At that time some hearings were open to the Public via WebEx ( so no hacking was involved) but WebEx proceedings are never to be recorded or broadcasted.
The Mod reminder has nothing to do with whatever allegedly happened in Court this year.

URL="CO - CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w/o Prejudice* #101"]CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w/o Prejudice* #101[/URL]

 

[waldojabba]

Really interesting reading here at this link: Authorities "close" to finding missing mom's body; charges against husband dismissed

This is straight from last night’s 48 hrs. It was worth the watch. Great find and post for those who missed it. I believe it can still be viewed on the cbs app.

 

[WingsOverTX]

DBM

 

[GatorFL]

The post you are referencing by a Mod is Post #3 and it’s on Page 1 of every thread since it was originally posted on September 29, 2021.
At that time some hearings were open to the Public via WebEx ( so no hacking was involved) but WebEx proceedings are never to be recorded or broadcasted.
The Mod reminder has nothing to do with whatever allegedly happened in Court this year.

URL="CO - CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w/o Prejudice* #101"]CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *Case dismissed w/o Prejudice* #101[/URL]

Thanks, I never watched it.

 

[Cindizzi]

I did not know that the "attempting to influence a public servant" was added to the fraud charges? Do you have something (link) where that is?




Yes, the 5/26 court hearing is in Chaffee County per court site. Per my notes it was never moved to Fremont County.

@Niner I included the attempting to influence charge because of this tweet by reporter LS:


https://twitter.com/laurenscharftv/status/1519026725039968256?s=21&t=Wh6xhWa9MwSiYMeQpHCw4Q
Update: #BarryMorphew will appear virtually for a status conference in a month on May 26 at 8:30 a.m. for allegedly submitting a presidential ballot for #SuzanneMorphew and asking for immunity from the FBI.

When someone criticized her saying asking for immunity is not a charge, she replied:

https://twitter.com/laurenscharftv/status/1519035838813794304?s=21&t=Wh6xhWa9MwSiYMeQpHCw4Q
I didn’t tweet these are his charges …
But since you want to know #BarryMorphew charges are:
- Attempt to Influence a Public Servant
- Forgery of Public Records
- Elections mail ballot offense


Sorry if I confused things!

 

[waldojabba]

But did it actually show unauthorized audio or video of the court proceeding?

No it did not

 

[swedeheart]

This is straight from last night’s 48 hrs. It was worth the watch. Great find and post for those who missed it. I believe it can still be viewed on the cbs app.

Another article I just noticed that mentions what was discussed on 48 Hours:

Missing mom's chilling final texts about 'abusive' husband revealed