Melinda's Contradictory Stmts???
Someone posted (sorry forgot who) that in one interview SM's sister said she was
afraid of BM (or was scared of BM? my paraphrasing); but in another interview, sister said SM said she was
not afraid of BM. Poster had concerns about def team bringing out seeming contradiction w sister on
cross exam.
Altho I recall stmts to same effect, it could be explained a couple ways.
1.
Phrasing of question. What did interviewer specifically ask? About phys harm from BM? About financial future for them cont'ing as a couple/family? Or fin. future for herself after? Afraid after separation/divorce, that BM would refuse to pay for college/uni ed. for younger dau? SM could be afraid of all/none. Or not afraid of one or some.
2.
Form of interview.
For ex, on one
livestream podcast, sister might give one answer, but on a recorded interview for
tv newscast (w opportunity or requirement to edit for length/clarity/what-ev), sister might give other answer. W. a
recorded & edited clip, some stmts are
left on the editing room floor.*
At trial on redirect exam of sister, prosecutor could ask whether the entire interview w reporter was aired, whether some of her stmts to that reporter had been omitted, etc. IOW, prosecutor could
rehabilitate her credibility on this issue.
Just my2ct.
________________________________________
* O/T warning. Bbm ^ as we used to say at a recording studio where college-age al66pine worked pt-time, back in the good old days
(?), when the radio ad was recorded on a reel-to-reel master tape, w audio editing done by hand w a razor blade & special adhesive tape, thus leaving tape
scraps on editing room floor. From master reel, the radio ad was duplicated onto cassette tapes, which were snail-mailed to each radio station being paid to air it.

Once Thomas Edison & Guglielmo Marconi dropped in to see & listen to their new inventions in use. <--- j/k about this, but tape on editing room floor was
actually a thing decades ago.
