Just my opinion but I think there's been plenty of incriminating evidence introduced over the past 3 days. Just what is 'real' evidence supposed to be?
Bear in mind that circumstantial evidence includes physical, digital, GPS, financial, testimony etc. It paints a pretty damning picture and can't be all explained away. BM's copious lies, misdirections and far-fetched excuses have also been exposed.
And I'm sure that there is more to come along that vein.
The defense can try to character assassinate SM all they want, since she is not here to defend herself, but it is BM's character that is on trial and being found wanting.
Bear in mind that circumstantial evidence includes physical, digital, GPS, financial, testimony etc. It paints a pretty damning picture and can't be all explained away. BM's copious lies, misdirections and far-fetched excuses have also been exposed.
And I'm sure that there is more to come along that vein.
The defense can try to character assassinate SM all they want, since she is not here to defend herself, but it is BM's character that is on trial and being found wanting.