Suzanne’s voice has only been a whisper throughout all of this so far, IMO. And I think that’s a big part of what the Prosecution is sandbagging for trial. Her own words — to her sister, to her neighbor, to SO, and to JL. All of whom can be called to step up and testify at trial. And that’s where justice for SM will ultimately be found.
The content of the AA was deemed sufficient by the judge to take the accused into custody. The PH will allow the judge to determine if the facts presented are such that a trial by a jury of peers for the accused is warranted. And he is by law bound to view the evidence with a prejudice that favors the prosecution. I believe the prosecution has jumped that hurdle. But even if it’s a close call in the judge’s mind, I believe judges will always err on the side of trial. Because, IMO, a jury of one’s peers is always the best imperfect way to see that justice is served.
How many times have we seen a case as noteworthy as this one fail at the PH stage? Not many, at least for me. My main concern at this point is if they establish a bond for BM, what that bond might be, and what limitations may come with it. I prefer, as I think many here do, that he remain in custody.
MOO.