Found Deceased CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, did not return from bike ride, Chaffee County, 10 May 2020 #45

[al66pine]

Who Owns PumaPath Home?

My opinion. No link. Should have stated that but it can be researched. Remember when the Puma address went missing off Google then reappeared as her charity?

PaulaDC bbm No quote or link for your earlier post stating BM transferred PP home to SM Hope Fdtn?
Re ^bbm^ I do not know, can't guess, what info is required for Google Earth maps or similar websites to add SMHF LLC to a location on its street view maps. If Google map shows SMHF at that address, no indication imo that the actual ownership or title or property itself was transferred.
Just adding here details & link supporting what @Knox and @TxGidget posted. Thanks to both.
Per public sales records re link below. Last sale =April 12, 2018 to BLM & SRM.
qPublic.net - Chaffee County, CO - Report: R368531400097
If BM signed deed to transfer prop to SM Hope Fdtn,* someone involved in the transfer (usu. atty or grantee)
would have the deed recorded in the recorder's office for Chaffee County.
Could BM have signed a deed to transfer prop to SM Hope Fdtn?* Yes. Or to anyone? Yes. Yes, either one.
If he did, it is not yet showing in electronic.-online records of the Chaffee Co. office as having been recorded.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* W only BM's siggie, and not SM's siggie, and no Gdnship dox from In or CO court, would deed have effectively transfer legal title of the prop? Not commenting on that, as it is entirely diff issue, different from whether someone signed a deed re PP prop, had it notarized, and then recorded in Chaffee Co. ofc. I could do that, but as I have no legal interest in the prop, there is no title or ownership for me to transfer the grantee on (my hypo) deed.

 

[Orso49]

I am also curious about GD and TN's connection. Why would the two of them seek out MG and talk about not having to tell LE about any phone conversation.

 

[Ontario Mom]

MOD NOTE - THIS POST LANDS AT RANDOM

REMINDER - AS THIS HAS BEEN POSTED HERE BEFORE:

While speculation based on the facts of the case is certainly allowed and encouraged, speculation based on no known facts in the case, such as BM being involved in an extra-marital affair, is not allowed.

Please stick to the facts in this case.

Thank you

 

[Knox]

Im wondering that too because I have seen the Puma Path address listed as a recent update for 2 or 3 of the LLCs.

I have only a limited understanding of what an LLC is and I am wondering why there are at least 3 of them from what I have seen.

My question is
Is that unusual to be tied to 3 different LLCs or is that common?

Very common.

 

[AmandaReckonwith]

Suzanne Morphew Case Archive:
Suzanne Morphew -CO-
The site seems user-friendly to cellphones now, after being completely changed.

 

[Hatfield]

I am also curious about GD and TN's connection. Why would the two of them seek out MG and talk about not having to tell LE about any phone conversation.

That is one of the conspicuous items that a lot of us questioned when we found out from MG herself about that.

IMO, there is no good reason other than a shady reason why they would tell her that.
If nobody did anything wrong then why would they try to tell her to go against anything LE asks?

It doesnt make any sense to me unless something very fishy is going on for people in the know.
JMO

 

[Lilypad13]

Just catching up. But if SM was all ready deceased at this point she wouldn't worry. So if she wasn't there would be calls or texts to BMs phone if she were worried. moo Red Flag

Yes exactly what I was getting at. And also IF she was still alive on Saturday night and IF BM had asked her and she had been ok with him going to set up for his job then she would have known what time he planned to leave. If he was leaving that early to set up for the job he wouldn’t just get up and leave before dawn without telling her. So if it was planned then he should have gone to bed early and got a good night’s rest and not been out running the roads at 4 am with Suzanne asleep at home in their bed. She would certainly hear him leave or wake up and wonder where he was if she was alive!
ITA Major RED FLAG!!

 

[swedeheart]

This was released today. Even though we saw a couple of days ago a video with Ashley, I think this is a new edit. (It's different bc I wrote a synopsis of the last video.)

"It reeks of Susan Powell." Ashely Banfield

 

[MissNat]

Pretty common for a business owner and especially someone who may have real estate investments. Basically, every piece of real estate can be put into a separate LLC to shield oneself from liability and asset seizure.

LLC (Limited Liability Corporation) also let’s you operate your business separate from your personal finances. If the business were to go bankrupt, it is not affiliated with your personal assets.
I’ve worked as clergy and with nonprofits for over 20 years. A 501c3 is not really owned by a person if it is run according to the law and tax code definitionS. If BM were to put the house under the foundation, wouldn’t a board of directors then have a say on the money? I guess that depends on who your board is and if you have a real working board. Hmmm.... JMO

 

[OldCop]

That is one of the conspicuous items that a lot of us questioned when we found out from MG herself about that.

IMO, there is no good reason other than a shady reason why they would tell her that.
If nobody did anything wrong then why would they try to tell her to go against anything LE asks?

It doesnt make any sense to me unless something very fishy is going on for people in the know.
JMO

ITA. It reminds me of that quote we discussed a few threads back, “The mountains hold secrets.”

 

[Trackergd]

When those who are close to, or work with an actor chose to make very basic and limited statements to LE and/or MSM, I tend to think that have figured out that a simple story is easier to keep track of and stick to. Perhaps they have seen what happens to actors who continually change their narrative. The more lies (and the more complex those lies) you tell, the harder it is to keep track of them all.

 

[GordianKnot]

I am also curious about GD and TN's connection. Why would the two of them seek out MG and talk about not having to tell LE about any phone conversation.

BBM:

It's hard to see a benign, innocent explanation for a friend and a nephew of an employer seeking out an employee to advise her of her rights with regard to interactions with LE.

How would GD and TN even know who MG is, much less where to track her down?

Clearly, this was done at the behest of the person with whom they all share a common acquaintance.

That entire scene as described by MG is beyond sketchy.

I'm still of the opinion that MG was paid in cash vs. check for her "time" during that weekend, including the Broomfield excursion, and that she got out of dodge because she was afraid that BM would not take kindly to her having spoken to LE after he had compensated her.

I'm wondering if cash exchanged hands when GD and TN went to see her.

If so, she's right to be afraid of BM.

JMO.

 

[LietKynes]

I'm very much on the fence regarding MG being involved, I just don't see her volunteering information such as the room stinking of bleach, Barry acting super strange on the job site and sounding like he had the worst night of his life on the phone etc. Surely if she is involved it would be in her best interest to downplay everything and not make any incriminating or damming statements towards Barry who she would clearly not want to get caught if she were involved. Surely she would be saying things like he sounded perfectly normal on the phone and seemed his usual self etc . The only time i could see somebody offering damming information like this would be if they were offered some sort of plea deal.

bbm

 

[Boxer]

I am also curious about GD and TN's connection. Why would the two of them seek out MG and talk about not having to tell LE about any phone conversation.

Yes. The way they are connected may explain a lot of vague, obscured but discernable connections going on in this case.

 

[Itsapuzzle]

Spontaneous random thought .... maybe the notes of Suzanne's were some kind of couple therapy/self help therapy, to help with saving a relationship, writing about the good times .... just a thought. The "I remember" parts leads me to speculate maybe it was that ... interesting to see what books she was currently reading or had on the shelves and if they encourage the writing of such thoughts. MOO of course.

 

[TxGidget]

Im wondering that too because I have seen the Puma Path address listed as a recent update for 2 or 3 of the LLCs.

I have only a limited understanding of what an LLC is and I am wondering why there are at least 3 of them from what I have seen.

My question is
Is that unusual to be tied to 3 different LLCs or is that common?

Common, I would say. My husband is a real estate developer, and he sets up a Limited Liability Company for each development. Dozens over the years. And they all are registered at his office. Since BM doesn’t have an office, the mailing address would be his home.

 

[TxGidget]

Maybe they arrived back at her place at 4a.m. hence her need to mention his truck coming/leaving. Then went their own ways. moo

My thoughts exactly

 

[Orgona]

BBM:

It's hard to see a benign, innocent explanation for a friend and a nephew of an employer seeking out an employee to advise her of her rights with regard to interactions with LE.

How would GD and TN even know who MG is, much less where to track her down?

Clearly, this was done at the behest of the person with whom they all share a common acquaintance.

That entire scene as described by MG is beyond sketchy.

I'm still of the opinion that MG was paid in cash vs. check for her "time" during that weekend, including the Broomfield excursion, and that she got out of dodge because she was afraid that BM would not take kindly to her having spoken to LE after he had compensated her.

I'm wondering if cash exchanged hands when GD and TN went to see her.

If so, she's right to be afraid of BM.

JMO.

I can see some not so innocent explanations for advising MG to don’t give her phone to LE.
The only half innocent explanation I could come up with is if BM sold them a sob story like he feels so stupid but they were sending flirty messages to each other which was innocent but now it would look bad and he believes in that case LE would stop looking for Suzanne and he wouldn’t want that. In that case GD and TN could think they are helping BM with something innocent totally for Suzanne’s well being out of loyalty to BM and SM.
I’m not sure I believe this, but this is the only situation I can come up with where they won’t have a nefarious reason for doing this.

 

[Hatfield]

Common, I would say. My husband is a real estate developer, and he sets up a Limited Liability Company for each development. Dozens over the years. And they all are registered at his office. Since BM doesn’t have an office, the mailing address would be his home.

Thanks everyone for explaining that it would not be unusual to have multiple LLCs.

 

[Trackergd]

It's hard to see a benign, innocent explanation for a friend and a nephew of an employer seeking out an employee to advise her of her rights with regard to interactions with LE.JMO.

Respectfully snipped and bolded by me.

For me, this is the "post of the day"