Hmm, well I talked about the BPD investigation not the FBI or any of the other people you named. I don't think they would have had jurisdiction unless invited by BPD. If it was dismissed by them as 'copy cat', then that would be an end to it.
I get you. I honestly don't know what the FBI had to say about "Amy's" case. It's possible that they talked to BPD about it, since the timeline fits with when the police and FBI were in communication, but I don't know.
I wonder about this too. You see, I think it might have been the reason that the DA eventually took over the investigation. That is, the BPD weren't actually working with 'the best of the best' but rather trying to keep it 'in house'. They seemed to take only the advice that agreed with their original theory (RDI) and disregard the rest. Now, I know you will argue this, but it's the way I see it.
Hmm. That's an interesting take on it. To me, it's kind of the reverse. Not only did the old DA, Alex Hunter, CRITICIZE the police for listening to the FBI too closely, but the DA who took over the case (ML) made it a point to only talk to people who agreed with her. Reminds me of Paul Simon's "Boxer."
I think it's very telling that the family of "Amy" felt that they needed to engage a PI to investigate, because the BPD weren't interested in doing so.
I'd love to hear his side of the story.
Maybe. I can't help but wonder if maybe it was something that went too far.
I used that interview to demonstrate the lack of interest he (and by association the whole department) had in investigating leads that weren't RDI. An association between suspects should have got more attention IMO.
Agreed, IF there was any association between the two. That's my point.