- Joined
- Nov 22, 2016
- Messages
- 912
- Reaction score
- 5,588
Coronavirus: Italy reports biggest daily jump in death toll Italy coronavirus death toll jumps to nearly 200
Coronavirus: Italy reports biggest daily jump in death toll Italy coronavirus death toll jumps to nearly 200
Coronavirus: Iran threatens 'force' to stop travel between cities
Coronavirus: Iran threatens to use 'force' to stop people travelling between cities | Daily Mail Online
Also: Repost:
Chinese doctors say autopsies of #coronavirus victims suggest that #COVID19 is “like a combination of #SARS and #AIDS as it damages both the lungs and immune systems,” and can cause “irreversible” lung damage even if the patient survives.
Dr. Dena Grayson on Twitter
@thespybrief
This is my simple math and I don't think it's a worse case.
The high risk group is baby boomers, over 60. There are 73 million in the US.
11 million - 15% of them get the virus (little lower than other countries)
1 million - 10% require hospitalization....so our hospitals are over-run. We don't even have this many beds open.
550,000 deaths- 5% of infected die....much, much lower % than other countries.
It just gets worse with higher percentages.
Speed is survival....the faster we test, the faster we can save lives.....
Quoting OddSocks post from thread #14
I believe a mathematical thing that has to do with the growth rate being on an exponential curve right now. I'm not good at maths so someone might correct me or be able to explain it better?
It's like, 100 people have the virus on day 1, and assuming 100% recovery rate, they will go to the 'recovered' column on day 15.
In the meantime, during those 15 days, more people have got infected. So if another 100 people contracted the virus between day 1 and day 15, you've got 200 confirmed cases, with 100 recovered.
We'll see that pattern change as growth plateaus and then eventually comes down the other side of the peak of the curve.
But before that happens, I would expect that difference between recovered and confirmed to go up, so you might see 100 recovered to 300 confirmed (as a ratio, not as specific numbers).
You could check it out on the figures for South Korea and Italy for the past few weeks and look at the recovered vs current confirmed cases. That should be even worse for that ratio as they're on a steep upward curve, whereas the global figures currently mostly consist of the Chinese cases which have already peaked. But, the predictions seem to suggest that is going to be their first peak, and they'll have another peak later in the year. They've already started importing cases from the rest of the world, and I don't think they'll be able to contain them, they should start seeding new outbreaks as they have in places like Italy and France.
<respectfully snipped>'The only comment I would add is that I believe your estimates are very conservative. I too would expect the mortality rate in first world countries, including the US, to be lower - BUT, ANY healthcare system that is too overwhelmed to provide needed care will not be able to reduce fatalities. The best healthcare in the world doesn’t do any good once its capacity has been exceeded!
I totally agree! I also want to add that the “wave” we’ve seen in China hasn’t been the natural curve of this virus. The wave in Hubei peaked in February, but it’s really an artificial peak due to their extreme actions and quarantine measures. In effect, the progression of the outbreak hasn’t ended so much as it’s been paused. The world has yet to see an outbreak of COVID-19 complete a natural cycle in any given location.
The mortality rates are very dynamic and fluid right now. I think we can expect the published mortality rate to bounce around quite a bit for at least awhile. We’re still in the early stages of progression and outcomes. There are still many unknowns, to many cases that have yet to be resolved one way or another, and a multitude of variables to be considered. IMO, the data will have a bumpy ride until this all plays out a bit further. Viral outbreaks are exponential in nature, and that creates an added level of difficulty when it comes to creating forecast models.
Florida reporting 2 Deaths!!!
1 death case in Santa Rosa County
1 NEW CASE death in Lee County
2 new cases in Broward Co. (South Fl.)
No details on either death case.
Per local ABC News Sat. am 3/7
Be sorry for the bees: 'Like sending bees to war': the deadly truth behind your almond milk obsessionI'll stick to almond milk also. Oat milk has too many calories.
LitCovid - NCBI - NLM - NIH
LitCovid is a curated literature hub for tracking up-to-date scientific information about the 2019 novel Coronavirus.
don't hold your breath, this is Florida.The first thing we want to know when we hear about a nearby confirmed infection is : where did that person work, and how long was that person in the community before reporting with the virus. If that person worked in a bank for a week before showing symptoms, everyone who worked in the bank and went to the bank has to tested, but chances are they all became infected from the bank contact and they spread to family members.
That is a possibility, but again, I'm a dystopian perspective in this discussion.
don't hold your breath, this is Florida.
can't run off the tourists.
edit- what the first 7 cases tell us is that there are active cases ALL OVER the state. SW- Ft. Myers area, NW=Pensacola area, SE- Ft. Lauderdale area, Sarasota area, and Tampa area.
Gov. DeSantis proclaimed 2 weeks ago that he was not 'allowed' to discuss testing numbers,I've been curious about Florida, the sunshine law state that releases all legal documents prior to trial. Why is that state allowed to withhold statewide health information that should be openly available as soon as it is discovered (individual legal rights).
Tourists are gone. If this had been handled properly from the beginning with physical barriers between infected populations and everyone else, it would be last week's story. Instead, it is tomorrow's headline. Politics and economics were a priority for the sprint, turns out this is a marathon.