Hatfield
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 17,014
- Reaction score
- 157,622
I had not noticed that, but bingo it looks like you are right. Vir = virus?
It could be. Maybe it just means anti-virus or something along those lines.
I had not noticed that, but bingo it looks like you are right. Vir = virus?
Wow....division in the ranks.....a view of things to come..,
_______________________
Coronavirus-infected Americans flown home against CDC’s advice
In the wee hours of a rainy Monday, more than a dozen buses sat on the tarmac at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport. Inside, 328 weary Americans wearing surgical masks and gloves waited anxiously to fly home after weeks in quarantine aboard the Diamond Princess, the luxury liner where the novel coronavirus had exploded into a ship-wide epidemic.
But as the buses idled, U.S. officials wrestled with troubling news. New test results showed that 14 passengers were infected with the virus. The U.S. State Department had promised that no one with the infection would be allowed to board the planes.
A decision had to be made. Let them all fly? Or leave them behind in Japanese hospitals?
In Washington, where it was still Sunday afternoon, a fierce debate broke out: The State Department and a top Trump administration health official wanted to forge ahead. The infected passengers had no symptoms and could be segregated on the plane in a plastic-lined enclosure. But officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention disagreed, contending they could still spread the virus. The CDC believed the 14 should not be flown back with uninfected passengers.
“It was like the worst nightmare,” said a senior U.S. official involved in the decision, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations. “Quite frankly, the alternative could have been pulling grandma out in the pouring rain, and that would have been bad, too.”
The State Department won the argument. But unhappy CDC officials demanded to be left out of the news release that explained that infected people were being flown back to the United States — a move that would nearly double the number of known coronavirus cases in this country.
The State Department made the call. The 14 people were already in the evacuation pipeline and protocol dictated they be brought home, said William Walters, director of operational medicine for the State Department.
As the State Department drafted its news release, CDC’s top officials insisted that any mention of the agency be removed.
“CDC did weigh in on this and explicitly recommended against it,” Schuchat wrote on behalf of the officials, according to an HHS official who saw the email and shared the language. “We should not be mentioned as having been consulted as it begs the question of what was our advice.”
Coronavirus-infected Americans flown home against CDC’s advice
Nope, just behind plastic sheet. Now some others that were on the plane are also testing positive.Well, well. I had expressed here an opinion as I assumed they were in the box? Guess not.
CDC didn't want positive people to fly into US, but I guess decision was made to do it anyway. Who decided to do it?
Wow....division in the ranks.....a view of things to come..,
_______________________
Coronavirus-infected Americans flown home against CDC’s advice
In the wee hours of a rainy Monday, more than a dozen buses sat on the tarmac at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport. Inside, 328 weary Americans wearing surgical masks and gloves waited anxiously to fly home after weeks in quarantine aboard the Diamond Princess, the luxury liner where the novel coronavirus had exploded into a ship-wide epidemic.
But as the buses idled, U.S. officials wrestled with troubling news. New test results showed that 14 passengers were infected with the virus. The U.S. State Department had promised that no one with the infection would be allowed to board the planes.
A decision had to be made. Let them all fly? Or leave them behind in Japanese hospitals?
In Washington, where it was still Sunday afternoon, a fierce debate broke out: The State Department and a top Trump administration health official wanted to forge ahead. The infected passengers had no symptoms and could be segregated on the plane in a plastic-lined enclosure. But officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention disagreed, contending they could still spread the virus. The CDC believed the 14 should not be flown back with uninfected passengers.
“It was like the worst nightmare,” said a senior U.S. official involved in the decision, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations. “Quite frankly, the alternative could have been pulling grandma out in the pouring rain, and that would have been bad, too.”
The State Department won the argument. But unhappy CDC officials demanded to be left out of the news release that explained that infected people were being flown back to the United States — a move that would nearly double the number of known coronavirus cases in this country.
The State Department made the call. The 14 people were already in the evacuation pipeline and protocol dictated they be brought home, said William Walters, director of operational medicine for the State Department.
As the State Department drafted its news release, CDC’s top officials insisted that any mention of the agency be removed.
“CDC did weigh in on this and explicitly recommended against it,” Schuchat wrote on behalf of the officials, according to an HHS official who saw the email and shared the language. “We should not be mentioned as having been consulted as it begs the question of what was our advice.”
Coronavirus-infected Americans flown home against CDC’s advice
I believe it's pretty obvious the test is not highly reliable. Some people tested negative numerous times (like the doctor who eventually died) before testing positive. Disease seems to start with mild symptoms that in some people progress to fatal pneumonia. So people who are feeling great might still get very sick.I almost don’t believe the TEST is reliable anymore. Am I being too alarmist?
But really, what is up with these tests- people testing positive and they feel great, and people testing negative but having all the symptoms?
Oh, and the CCP constantly changing how they are defining positive cases. Chest scan, no chest scan, sometimes the scan shows it but not always, etc etc.
MOO.
I believe it's pretty obvious the test is not highly reliable. Some people tested negative numerous times (like the doctor who eventually died) before testing positive. Disease seems to start with mild symptoms that in some people progress to fatal pneumonia. So people who are feeling great might still get very sick.I almost don’t believe the TEST is reliable anymore. Am I being too alarmist?
But really, what is up with these tests- people testing positive and they feel great, and people testing negative but having all the symptoms?
Oh, and the CCP constantly changing how they are defining positive cases. Chest scan, no chest scan, sometimes the scan shows it but not always, etc etc.
MOO.
Big surprise. Not. And there is a bunch of the passengers running around in Japan, as far as I can tell, including a bunch of Americans. Japan really screwed up here, as far as I am concerned.2 Australian passengers from quarantined cruise ship test positive
Two out of 164 Australians who were flown back from the Diamond Princess cruise ship have tested positive.
None of them displayed any symptoms and did not test positive for the virus in Japan. After they were screened again in Australia, six of them began to display minor respiratory symptoms and fever, and two were subsequently confirmed.
Coronavirus live updates: China's Hubei reports 115 additional deaths
Wow....division in the ranks.....a view of things to come..,
_______________________
Coronavirus-infected Americans flown home against CDC’s advice
In the wee hours of a rainy Monday, more than a dozen buses sat on the tarmac at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport. Inside, 328 weary Americans wearing surgical masks and gloves waited anxiously to fly home after weeks in quarantine aboard the Diamond Princess, the luxury liner where the novel coronavirus had exploded into a ship-wide epidemic.
But as the buses idled, U.S. officials wrestled with troubling news. New test results showed that 14 passengers were infected with the virus. The U.S. State Department had promised that no one with the infection would be allowed to board the planes.
A decision had to be made. Let them all fly? Or leave them behind in Japanese hospitals?
In Washington, where it was still Sunday afternoon, a fierce debate broke out: The State Department and a top Trump administration health official wanted to forge ahead. The infected passengers had no symptoms and could be segregated on the plane in a plastic-lined enclosure. But officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention disagreed, contending they could still spread the virus. The CDC believed the 14 should not be flown back with uninfected passengers.
“It was like the worst nightmare,” said a senior U.S. official involved in the decision, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations. “Quite frankly, the alternative could have been pulling grandma out in the pouring rain, and that would have been bad, too.”
The State Department won the argument. But unhappy CDC officials demanded to be left out of the news release that explained that infected people were being flown back to the United States — a move that would nearly double the number of known coronavirus cases in this country.
The State Department made the call. The 14 people were already in the evacuation pipeline and protocol dictated they be brought home, said William Walters, director of operational medicine for the State Department.
As the State Department drafted its news release, CDC’s top officials insisted that any mention of the agency be removed.
“CDC did weigh in on this and explicitly recommended against it,” Schuchat wrote on behalf of the officials, according to an HHS official who saw the email and shared the language. “We should not be mentioned as having been consulted as it begs the question of what was our advice.”
Coronavirus-infected Americans flown home against CDC’s advice
HUMBOLDT COUNTY, Calif. —
Humboldt County Department of Health ... has received confirmation of one case of COVID-19 in a Humboldt County resident. A close contact who has symptoms is being tested as well.
This marks the first confirmed case of the novel coronavirus in Humboldt County.
Presently, the ill individuals are doing well and self-isolating at home, while being monitored for symptoms by the Public Health Communicable Disease Surveillance and Control Unit.
First case of novel Coronavirus confirmed in Humboldt County
Had to look on a map, city included in that county is Eureka (Jodi Arias old home) I guess the health departments are no longer stating if the new person is a contact of a previous one, or their travel history? Wonder what the background on this person was to catch the virus.