I disagree strongly with this comment.
It is clear that healthcare workers can become infected taking care of COVID-19 patients, and can even die. (We don't yet have any information that they would have been considered to have the high-risk conditions of advanced age or other medical conditions that lower immunity)
But there is no information that a "large proportion of infected people were infected AT THE HOSPITAL"
For that to happen, a large proportion of uninfected, asymptomatic people who were free of the virus would have to be taken into the hospital and that is certainly not going on. That would be the antithesis of quarantine.
Your statement is hyperbole.
I will redact that portion of my statement with this post as I can no longer edit the original. I’ll also add that after reading my post again, I should have worded it differently. I didn’t mean that the majority of the 70,000 confirmed infected were infected at the hospital. I’m not even sure the majority were confirmed in a hospital setting.
I should have stated that it’s my opinion that several people were infected at the hospital. I would consider that a logical assumption based on what we know of the virus. We know the hospitals were overwhelmed with patients that were waiting for hours in crowded waiting areas, we now know the virus is airborne, we know it’s highly contagious, and we know 1,700 members of the medical staff have been infected, etc,..
My point of the statement was that after witnessing the progression of the virus on the Diamond Princess, and knowing that the virus is airborne in nature, and can possibly be transmitted through plumbing, etc,... IMO, it’s not a good idea to divide a single facility for care of both the infected and non infected.
Specialized containment rooms that have been built for that specific purpose are different, but I just don’t think retrofitting an existing hospital for segregated viral containment is a good idea at this point.
ALL MOO....