- Joined
- Dec 9, 2016
- Messages
- 1,294
- Reaction score
- 11,689
This article is from the year 2009, and talks about what might happen if there are not a sufficient number of ventilators available in a crisis. This was back when the "swine flu" was the topic of the day, and they were worried about the moral/ethical conundrum of rationing vents.
Virulent Swine Flu May Trigger Rationing Of Ventilators
(snipped and bbm)
"If swine flu (this is 2009 they are discussing) takes a turn toward the truly terrible, hospitals will be swamped and there won't be enough ventilators to help the very sick breathe."
Right now, a doomsday scenario doesn't seem likely. The second wave of H1N1 looks a lot like the usual seasonal flu and not a reprise of the Spanish Flu, the 1918 pandemic that killed 50 million or more.
Still, public health officials are preparing for the worst and that means coming up with plans for who would get a ventilator and who wouldn't. Rationing of ventilators could pit the families of people with serious non-flu illnesses against those of acutely ill flu patients.
The foundation for a lot of the thinking about ventilator rationing is the New York Protocol, drafted by New York public health officials in 2007 before swine flu was even on the map.
(from 2009)Under the most serious flu scenario they contemplated, more than three-quarters of a million New Yorkers would be hospitalized and 153,000 would die. During the peak of the pandemic ventilator needs would outstrip the supply by more than 15,000."
Some think a less-than-worst-care scenario could overwhelm ventilator and ICU capacity in the US. Last month, an analysis published online by PLoS Currents: Influenza figured if swine flu infects 46 million Americans and puts 2.7 million in the hospital, more than 330,000 folks might require ventilators, exceeding current capacity by more than 23 percent."
Virulent Swine Flu May Trigger Rationing Of Ventilators
(snipped and bbm)
"If swine flu (this is 2009 they are discussing) takes a turn toward the truly terrible, hospitals will be swamped and there won't be enough ventilators to help the very sick breathe."
Right now, a doomsday scenario doesn't seem likely. The second wave of H1N1 looks a lot like the usual seasonal flu and not a reprise of the Spanish Flu, the 1918 pandemic that killed 50 million or more.
Still, public health officials are preparing for the worst and that means coming up with plans for who would get a ventilator and who wouldn't. Rationing of ventilators could pit the families of people with serious non-flu illnesses against those of acutely ill flu patients.
The foundation for a lot of the thinking about ventilator rationing is the New York Protocol, drafted by New York public health officials in 2007 before swine flu was even on the map.
(from 2009)Under the most serious flu scenario they contemplated, more than three-quarters of a million New Yorkers would be hospitalized and 153,000 would die. During the peak of the pandemic ventilator needs would outstrip the supply by more than 15,000."
Some think a less-than-worst-care scenario could overwhelm ventilator and ICU capacity in the US. Last month, an analysis published online by PLoS Currents: Influenza figured if swine flu infects 46 million Americans and puts 2.7 million in the hospital, more than 330,000 folks might require ventilators, exceeding current capacity by more than 23 percent."