Coronavirus COVID-19 - Global Health Pandemic #79

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #641
It's interesting that we are starting to see some standardization of "alert" levels, based around cases per 100K and hospital usage (along with percent positive, although that seems too dependent on access and turn around times, resulting in only sick people being tested.)

I know bars are easy to single out and punish, but I wonder if we will ever see numbers that show what measures work and what don't. AZ went from "worst to first," over the Summer, but so much happened that it's impossible to know if it was a single measure, all of them, or something, as yet, unknown that caused cases to drop.

I just read an article, let me see if I can find it again, that said that it is all of the measures - used together - that have the best result.


Hmm ... not finding the exact article again (the one I read said masks, social distancing, hygiene, testing, closures during outbreaks, contact tracing, 14 day quarantining) but here is one kind of reference:

South Korea has ridden out the second wave better than any other democratic nation, says Tool. “They don’t go for big lockdowns,” he says. “They close bars, clubs, close churches again, but they have a really aggressive test and trace system and that’s been the key to the success.”

The South Korean contact tracing system is decentralised and works on mobilising local health units. New South Wales, which has the best contact tracing system in Australia, is the same.

What Australia needs to do to avoid a third Covid wave
 
Last edited:
  • #642
Iowa news today: As of 10:00-11:00 a.m. today, we had 1,086 new confirmed cases for a total of 84,433 confirmed cases of which 62,594 had recovered (IMO +1,128). 4 more had passed away for a total of 1,303. Sadly, hospitalizations and long term care center outbreaks have increased overnight (+9 for ltc). ** However, I do wonder with the care centers that have a low number of postive cases, if they took the anitgen or PCR tests. IMO, I know of a care center local to me that tested patients with both tests (antigen 1st were postive) and PCR (more accurate test according to the center) were then all negative, so a doctor that the center uses advised them to only use PCR tests and get rid of the antigen tests that they had there. The center still has to be listed as having an outbreak though even if they are all negative because of the 1st tests being positive.
50 care facilities report outbreaks as Iowa surpasses 1,300 deaths
Iowa COVID-19 Information
IDPH says cases will rise this weekend with additional long-term care testing
There are 50 current long-term care facility COVID-19 outbreaks across the state
Gov. Reynolds extends bar closures in Johnson and Story counties through Oct. 4
Iowa City schools report 13 active cases, without in-person class
ICCSD appealing to IA Supreme Court after losing to Gov. on learning requirements
COVID-19 cases force West Delaware High School to move to hybrid learning
Mount Pleasant Community Schools cancel football games for tonight
Independence Junior and Senior High School students to transition to hybrid learning model beginning Monday
 
  • #643
My guess is that a reason for that is that when wearing a mask, whether cloth or paper, you will breath in tiny fibres from it, and those fibres irritate the cilia in the nose and lungs. Add to that a moist environment under the mask.
Cilium - Wikipedia
I have hellish allergies this time of year, but I am not experiencing them worse than other years. I wear my mask 6+ hours a day. But I use laundry detergent that is basically hypoallergenic as well. I change my filter daily and wash the mask after a single day’s use.
 
  • #644
Iowa news today: As of 10:00-11:00 a.m. today, we had 1,086 new confirmed cases for a total of 84,433 confirmed cases of which 62,594 had recovered (IMO +1,128). 4 more had passed away for a total of 1,303. Sadly, hospitalizations and long term care center outbreaks have increased overnight (+9 for ltc). ** However, I do wonder with the care centers that have a low number of postive cases, if they took the anitgen or PCR tests. IMO, I know of a care center local to me that tested patients with both tests (antigen 1st were postive) and PCR (more accurate test according to the center) were then all negative, so a doctor that the center uses advised them to only use PCR tests and get rid of the antigen tests that they had there. The center still has to be listed as having an outbreak though even if they are all negative because of the 1st tests being positive.
50 care facilities report outbreaks as Iowa surpasses 1,300 deaths
Iowa COVID-19 Information
IDPH says cases will rise this weekend with additional long-term care testing
There are 50 current long-term care facility COVID-19 outbreaks across the state
Gov. Reynolds extends bar closures in Johnson and Story counties through Oct. 4
Iowa City schools report 13 active cases, without in-person class
ICCSD appealing to IA Supreme Court after losing to Gov. on learning requirements
COVID-19 cases force West Delaware High School to move to hybrid learning
Mount Pleasant Community Schools cancel football games for tonight
Independence Junior and Senior High School students to transition to hybrid learning model beginning Monday

I read an article yesterday that says that Iowa is among the worst covid states at the moment.
But it is good to see all of the measures that are being taken to get this under control.
Even down to the best way to have a child's birthday celebration. :)


(The article in this BBC link has that interesting moving graph at the bottom of the article, showing the escalation of cases throughout the world over time. The graph is called "How confirmed cases of coronavirus have spread")
xx2.JPG
Tracking the pandemic: Where are the global hotspots?

xx2.JPG
https://twitter.com/IAPublicHealth/...2?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet
 
  • #645
It's interesting that we are starting to see some standardization of "alert" levels, based around cases per 100K and hospital usage (along with percent positive, although that seems too dependent on access and turn around times, resulting in only sick people being tested.)

I know bars are easy to single out and punish, but I wonder if we will ever see numbers that show what measures work and what don't. AZ went from "worst to first," over the Summer, but so much happened that it's impossible to know if it was a single measure, all of them, or something, as yet, unknown that caused cases to drop.

There are studies with numbers, mostly based on apps and phones, which work in most modern settings. Bars are an issue because people stand up and move around. Distances between faces are often less than 3 feet. As people drink they become disinhibited and start dancing and touching. They get upset if they are told to distance, which endangers everyone (not just with CoVid).

Frankly, it's the various behaviors of bar-goers that at issue. Restaurants usually want/expect people to sit at tables, which helps cut transmission, although to some degree we're just walking a razor's edge.

People are going to transmit CoVid indoors, esp. if they are 3-6 feet apart for 30-60 minutes. These rules are designed to limit that.

Unfortunately, people just go have house parties. By handling the pandemic as a matter of political and legal authority, we've made it into yet another thing for people to break the rules, thereby feeling "free."

In just 12 states, people are kinda wearing masks.
 
  • #646
I too got 2 sprays from my doctor (one is a new antihistamine that works in the sinuses - it’s the BOMB) and the other is a steroid (Flonase - it’s OTC). Now all my morning and late evening coughing are gone! I’m actually in better respiratory health than before COVID - I wish I’d known there was something that could fix the cough, earlier.

It’s the antihistamine one that seems to be making the big difference.

Also - we got neoprene masks, so no fibers and for our purposes, that’s fine. I also have some polyester ones that have a filter pocket (but nothing to shed right next to my nose).
My masks now being lined with silk may make a difference for me as well. My masks never bother me anymore.
 
  • #647
I’m both furious and heartsick today upon receiving my daily email update from the State of Oregon. This is a state government that has been responsible and proactive since the beginning of the pandemic. So guess who is not taking this seriously? Selfish and willfully ignorant citizens who seem to think their little gathering won’t make a difference. Well guess what? It does. :mad::(

Case count reaches new high, but together we can flatten the curve again
Today, we announced 457 new and presumptive COVID-19 cases. Sadly, this is the highest daily case count since the beginning of the pandemic in Oregon. We continue to see cases where seemingly innocuous activities – that we would not have thought twice about in the past—are fueling outbreaks.

Some examples of these cases include the following:
  • An Oregon county has 13 cases associated with four university outbreaks, including a Greek house and three athletic teams.
  • A county has 22 cases associated with three university outbreaks, including two Greek houses and a large back-to-school party.
  • Another county has an outbreak that now includes 19 cases. It started with a small group who met for a prayer group while some also participated in a sewing group. One of the household members has died. None of the people reported wearing masks. The cases range in age from young children to 80s.
  • Employees in a local company had an employee Labor Day party and now six employees are positive.
“While our recent modeling suggests that transmission may be waning, it also indicates that even a modest uptick in transmission can lead to an increase in daily cases – like the one we’re experiencing now – which can quickly eradicate the progress we have made in subduing the virus,” State Health Officer Dean Sidelinger said in a media briefing today.

We’ve all worked too hard beating back the tide of the virus to let that happen. We all know what needs to be done:

  • Stay at least six feet apart from people outside your household
  • Restrict your gatherings
  • Wear a face covering when you are outside the house or indoors where distancing can’t be achieved
We’ve flattened the curve before, and we can do so again. As always, thank you for all you’re doing to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in our communities.
Oregon Coronavirus Update
BBM
 
  • #648
County Elections Coordinator Refuses to Mask Up at Training for Poll Workers | My Canyon Lake

“Lynn Silver, an election judge, said she arrived at Comal County Elections office today to find all other attendees masked up and sitting six feet apart. Jaqua, standing in front of the room, wasn’t wearing a mask.

“I stood up and waved to Ms. Jaqua from the back of the room, and asked her to please wear a mask since she was doing the training,” Silver said on Facebook. “She answered me saying that the CDC recommends it but she is not required to wear a mask. I then asked her if she could please put on a mask out of respect for people in attendance. She replied that she would not because everyone was social distancing. I thanked her and left. I am shocked that folks are so disrespectful of senior citizens and humans in general when it comes to mask-wearing.”
 
  • #649
  • #650
My friends came to bar and left because there were "no seats." They removed 50% of bar stools, but that still leaves people 20 inches apart. I couldn't help but think that if I was an inspector and commented on the lack of distancing, and owner said "but I removed half my stools to comply," that I would lose my <blank> and try to revoke his liquor license. I'm in a strange place - I want to be able to stand around people, as I do when the other brother is working, without a seat, but, once again, the intellectual dishonesty undoes me. Either put every stool back, or take enough out to comply, but DON'T be cheating and pretend to be holy.

Sorry, it's my pet peeve.
 
  • #651
Less then a 8 months ago, we were going about our daily business.
What an evil world shattering event, laid upon all of this world in less than a year.
Innocents, all of us.
A devastating tiny microb killing and devastating entire countries.
I just cannot fathom the devastating outcome from all. Of this. Yes. I'm very aware how many times I said devastating. There is no other word for this virus in my opinion, except devastating.
I can hardly imagine next year, as countries run out of money.
And they will.


Britain is at a tipping point on COVID-19, Health Minister Matt Hancock said on Sunday, warning that a second national lockdown could be imposed if people don't follow government rules designed to stop the spread of the virus.

COVID-19 cases have risen sharply in recent weeks to more than 4000 per day. Prime Minister Boris Johnson has called it a second wave and stricter lockdown measures have been introduced in areas across the country - with London possibly next in line.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe...ble-health-minister-says-20200920-p55xhu.html
 
  • #652
They down-played masks for one reason, in my opinion from what I have researched, because they did not want shortages, shortages for health care workers on the front lines.

Opinion Only

rsbm

I totally agree, it was evident to me, at the early stage of the virus threat, that a run on masks (like toilet paper etc) would deplete the supply for front line workers. It didn't make sense that they down-played masks, which Asians and other people have worn for years due to big city smog conditions. Obviously, millions of people think wearing a mask is better protection than not wearing one. Meanwhile, the Chinese citizens at the epi-center of Covid were all wearing masks due to the virus.

I can understand why they lied (and I believe they did) because they knew that front-line workers were faced with a shortage supply at that time. They lost credibility with some people when they finally promoted masks once the short supply was no longer critical. Although I hate being lied to by my government, I don't know how they could have handled it differently to protect front-line workers who were the most vulnerable in the early stages of the virus. But the fall-out of lying would prove problematic for people who wouldn't trust any contradicting further directives as the virus progressed and more was learned.

As ilovewings pointed out, the mixed messages and evolving recommendations and benefits for masks has confused the public, and furthered the lack of trust in government expert's guidance. The directive--wearing a mask won't protect you, but will protect other people--was a dismal failure. Obviously some people cared more about their discomfort and rights than other people's lives. The same mind set is holding true for young students who have arrived at colleges and are crowd partying and hitting bars with no consideration of protective guidelines. I judge people with this reckless attitude as being the epitome of lacking in empathy, let alone common sense, and being selfish with a misguided sense of entitlement. Not my favorite kind of person.

I think that there is a mind-set that has become more prevalent as the pandemic continues and that is, if you aren't old or have underlying health problems, you don't have to worry about covid 19, and therefore, life should go on for on you, as normal. Some people justify their rebellion of rejecting wearing a mask and social distancing rules by calling covid a hoax. Some quote the low death rate versus the number of cases, but have no comprehension of how many people have been actually emotionally or financially affected by the 200,000 deaths in America alone. The grief alone for the extended family and friends of those 200,000 people would amount to about 3 million people suffering from their deaths. But as Trump said "It is what it is". I interpreted his words as "Get over it".

I am all for kick-starting the ecomomy, but can't ignore the warnings about doing so while the virus is uncontrolled, which is a critical factor in predicting failure in reviving the economy during a pandemic. We will see if businesses survive by the opening up of restrictions. We will see if it was safe to send our kids to school. We will hopefully see a vacine introduced that has been tested to the usual standards for public safety.

Sorry for the long post--it is all my opinion only. After 6 months of adhering to extremely safe protocols in order to be part of my vulnerable daughter's "bubble" (she has a kidney transplant) I am becoming exceedingly intolerant of the selfish people (namely the college party gang) in my community who have ignored rules and have spiked the covid cases since they recently arrived. I am over 60, and my daughter is a mom of two young kids, who has underlying health issues, so I guess we are considered the weak and disposable members of their society...the "it is what it is" mentality. I honestly feel sorry for the people who lack the soul to care about others, and this pandemic has shown who they are. I hope they feel the shame one day when this is over.
 
  • #653
Less then a 8 months ago, we were going about our daily business.
What an evil world shattering event, laid upon all of this world in less than a year.
Innocents, all of us.
A devastating tiny microb killing and devastating entire countries.
I just cannot fathom the devastating outcome from all. Of this. Yes. I'm very aware how many times I said devastating. There is no other word for this virus in my opinion, except devastating.
I can hardly imagine next year, as countries run out of money.
And they will.

I have another word for this virus-- Evil- The Devil's Work
 
  • #654
Wouldn't it be nice if everyone across the world who has a FB account shared this little 2 minute video.
Some great photography, and an important message. :)
Really worthwhile spending 2 minutes of your life to watch it. IMO

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

"The window of opportunity is now. We must act now, and act together to end COVID-19"- Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
 
  • #655
Ep 24 Osterholm Update COVID-19: Long-Haulers
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Dr. O in 2006:
Infectious Disease Expert in 2006 Warns of Inevitable Pandemic | The Oprah Winfrey Show | OWN - YouTube
In 2006, "The Oprah Show" featured a special report on the looming threat of a deadly bird flu outbreak in America. Oprah invited Dr. Michael Osterholm, an i...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Re: the above video from 2006, I thought Dr. O’s comments re: chlorine were interesting. Additionally, he predicated there would be a shortage of masks, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • #656
Excellent post @casesensitive. I totally agree and I’m very frustrated that so many are not willing to make sacrifices for the sake of the more vulnerable.

I remember when the “save masks for healthcare workers” idea was promoted, and IIRC it was the N-95 mask that was the one the government was trying to conserve. My husband and I have a stash of N-95 masks on hand for wildfire smoke here in Oregon and in our emergency go-bags. We had mixed feelings about wearing them because it would look like we were ignoring the government request and just being selfish. But as senior citizens, common sense told us we needed the extra protection. So we rotated a few that we had used for smoke a couple of years ago and offered the unused ones to a nurse friend to use if she needed them. She never took us up on our offer, so the new ones are still in our go-bags. We soon got cloth masks from a friend that hold a coffee filter, so I use those on the rare occasions I go anywhere. My husband wears his cloth mask over an N-95 mask, plus goggles when he goes out for walks or to run errands.

We now know the extent to which some in the government attempted to downplay the seriousness of the pandemic and the need for masks and social distancing and staying home...attitudes that trickle down to local citizens. Thanks goodness for the few who will speak truth to power like Dr Fauci, but without a coordinated response, we have been on our own to protect ourselves from those who don’t care about protecting us. Let’s hope we survive until a safe vaccine is available. Over 200,000 have not and many still suffer long term effects from this virus. I struggle with both sadness and anger over how unnecessary this is.
JMO MOO

rsbm

I totally agree, it was evident to me, at the early stage of the virus threat, that a run on masks (like toilet paper etc) would deplete the supply for front line workers. It didn't make sense that they down-played masks, which Asians and other people have worn for years due to big city smog conditions. Obviously, millions of people think wearing a mask is better protection than not wearing one. Meanwhile, the Chinese citizens at the epi-center of Covid were all wearing masks due to the virus.

I can understand why they lied (and I believe they did) because they knew that front-line workers were faced with a shortage supply at that time. They lost credibility with some people when they finally promoted masks once the short supply was no longer critical. Although I hate being lied to by my government, I don't know how they could have handled it differently to protect front-line workers who were the most vulnerable in the early stages of the virus. But the fall-out of lying would prove problematic for people who wouldn't trust any contradicting further directives as the virus progressed and more was learned.

As ilovewings pointed out, the mixed messages and evolving recommendations and benefits for masks has confused the public, and furthered the lack of trust in government expert's guidance. The directive--wearing a mask won't protect you, but will protect other people--was a dismal failure. Obviously some people cared more about their discomfort and rights than other people's lives. The same mind set is holding true for young students who have arrived at colleges and are crowd partying and hitting bars with no consideration of protective guidelines. I judge people with this reckless attitude as being the epitome of lacking in empathy, let alone common sense, and being selfish with a misguided sense of entitlement. Not my favorite kind of person.

I think that there is a mind-set that has become more prevalent as the pandemic continues and that is, if you aren't old or have underlying health problems, you don't have to worry about covid 19, and therefore, life should go on for on you, as normal. Some people justify their rebellion of rejecting wearing a mask and social distancing rules by calling covid a hoax. Some quote the low death rate versus the number of cases, but have no comprehension of how many people have been actually emotionally or financially affected by the 200,000 deaths in America alone. The grief alone for the extended family and friends of those 200,000 people would amount to about 3 million people suffering from their deaths. But as Trump said "It is what it is". I interpreted his words as "Get over it".

I am all for kick-starting the ecomomy, but can't ignore the warnings about doing so while the virus is uncontrolled, which is a critical factor in predicting failure in reviving the economy during a pandemic. We will see if businesses survive by the opening up of restrictions. We will see if it was safe to send our kids to school. We will hopefully see a vacine introduced that has been tested to the usual standards for public safety.

Sorry for the long post--it is all my opinion only. After 6 months of adhering to extremely safe protocols in order to be part of my vulnerable daughter's "bubble" (she has a kidney transplant) I am becoming exceedingly intolerant of the selfish people (namely the college party gang) in my community who have ignored rules and have spiked the covid cases since they recently arrived. I am over 60, and my daughter is a mom of two young kids, who has underlying health issues, so I guess we are considered the weak and disposable members of their society...the "it is what it is" mentality. I honestly feel sorry for the people who lack the soul to care about others, and this pandemic has shown who they are. I hope they feel the shame one day when this is over.
 
  • #657
  • #658
Florida's Governor Lifts All COVID-19 Restrictions On Businesses Statewide

“Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis says he is lifting all restrictions on businesses statewide that were imposed to control the spread of the virus that causes COVID-19. Most significantly, that means restaurants and bars in the state can now operate at full capacity.“

[...]

“DeSantis also said his order would stop cities and counties from fining people for not wearing mandated face coverings. He said fines and other penalties imposed so far would be suspended.“
 
  • #659
Iowa news today: As of 10:00-11:00 a.m. today, we had 1,086 new confirmed cases for a total of 84,433 confirmed cases of which 62,594 had recovered (IMO +1,128). 4 more had passed away for a total of 1,303. Sadly, hospitalizations and long term care center outbreaks have increased overnight (+9 for ltc). ** However, I do wonder with the care centers that have a low number of postive cases, if they took the anitgen or PCR tests. IMO, I know of a care center local to me that tested patients with both tests (antigen 1st were postive) and PCR (more accurate test according to the center) were then all negative, so a doctor that the center uses advised them to only use PCR tests and get rid of the antigen tests that they had there. The center still has to be listed as having an outbreak though even if they are all negative because of the 1st tests being positive.
50 care facilities report outbreaks as Iowa surpasses 1,300 deaths
Iowa COVID-19 Information
IDPH says cases will rise this weekend with additional long-term care testing
There are 50 current long-term care facility COVID-19 outbreaks across the state
Gov. Reynolds extends bar closures in Johnson and Story counties through Oct. 4
Iowa City schools report 13 active cases, without in-person class
ICCSD appealing to IA Supreme Court after losing to Gov. on learning requirements
COVID-19 cases force West Delaware High School to move to hybrid learning
Mount Pleasant Community Schools cancel football games for tonight
Independence Junior and Senior High School students to transition to hybrid learning model beginning Monday
From one of your links is this link that explains a bit more.

IDPH, State Hygienic Lab can't meet federal COVID-19 testing requirements for long-term care facilities


"In a letter, The IDPH and SHL say the increased volume and frequency that will be generated by the requirement to conduct routine testing, plus the testing already occurring across the state, will exceed the current capacity of the State Hygienic Lab. The two agencies say they will not be able to provide or process routine tests in order to comply with the new rule.

The State Hygienic Lab currently has the ability to process around 5,000 tests per day. The IDPH and SHL say they will continue to conduct testing in facilities where staff or residents become symptomatic or cases are identified. The IDPH says HHS plans to supply rapid point-of-care testing supplies and equipment to long-term care facilities, which should allow facilities to meet the new testing requirements.

As of Friday, more than half of the state's COVID-19-related deaths have occurred at long-term care facilities and at least 39 outbreaks are being reported. The state defines an outbreak as 3 or more residents inside a facility testing positive."

The letter can be downloaded at the end of the article.

The link below is to the part of the Iowa dashboard that lists each care home by county and name. Some homes had zero recoveries for those who caught Covid.

Iowa COVID-19 Information

You have to page down after opening the site and wait for the data to load.
 
Last edited:
  • #660
Ok I don't remember this new testing regime being announced but have found this link. It was a month ago.

Trump Administration Strengthens COVID-19 Surveillance with New Reporting and Testing Requirements for Nursing Homes, Other Providers | CMS

As it is a gov site and not subject to the 10% rule, I will paste it all below.

Today, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced sweeping regulatory changes that require nursing homes to test staff and offer testing to residents for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Laboratories and nursing homes using point-of-care testing devices will be required to report diagnostic test results as required by theCoronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). The new rules also require hospitals to provide COVID-19 cases and related data to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

These new requirements strongly support the Trump Administration’s efforts to boost surveillance of the virus and double down on its commitment to keep nursing home residents safe. The requirements will support federal and state efforts to identify early spread of the virus and allocate personal protective equipment (PPE) and other resources.

“These new rules represent a dramatic acceleration of our efforts to track and control the spread of COVID-19,” said CMS Administrator Seema Verma. “Reporting of test results and other data are vitally important tools for controlling the spread of the virus and give providers on the front lines what they need to fight it.”

New testing requirements for nursing homes

CMS is again acting to safeguard nursing home residents from the ongoing threat of COVID-19 by revising its infection-control regulations for long-term care facilities to require nursing homes to test their staff for COVID-19.

The new rules follow a series of actions designed to increase testing in nursing homes. In April, CMS called on Governors to create a testing plan for their nursing homes, provided new payment for collection of lab samples in nursing homes as well as increasing payment for certain tests. In May, CMS provided re-opening recommendations to nursing homes and states which called for baseline testing of all residents and staff, and routine testing of staff.

President Trump previewed CMS’s testing requirement in July along with the announcement that rapid, point-of-care diagnostic devices would be distributed to all nursing homes across the country that are certified to perform these types of tests.

“From the beginning of this pandemic, President Trump has worked tirelessly to protect our vulnerable elderly in nursing homes. The provisions in today’s rule on nursing homes represent his expectation that CMS pull every available regulatory lever to maximize nursing home residents’ safety and quality of life. These Americans and their families, who have already gone through so much, deserve nothing less.”

That recommendation for testing staff routinely is now a requirement for participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs under CMS’ authority through the Social Security Act to adequately protect the health, safety, welfare, and rights of residents. CMS recommendations for the frequency of staff testing will be based on the degree of community spread, to be announced shortly through guidance, that indicate the facility may be at increased risk for COVID-19 transmission.

CMS now requires that nursing homes will offer tests to residents when there is an outbreak or residents show symptoms. This is part of CMS’ continued efforts to help nursing homes to control the spread of the virus.

The Administration is holding nursing homes accountable for the testing requirement by directing surveyors to inspect nursing homes for adherence to the new testing requirements. Facilities that do not comply with the new requirements will be cited for non-compliance and may face enforcement sanctions based on the severity of the noncompliance, such as civil money penalties in excess of $400 per day, or over $8,000 for an instance of noncompliance.

The Administration is helping facilities offset the cost of testing through new funding from the Provider Relief Fund, authorized under the CARES Act. On July 22, 2020, President Trump announced the release of an additional $5 billion from the Provider Relief Fund to help nursing homes address critical needs, including hiring additional staff, increasing testing, and providing additional services, such as technology so residents can connect with their families if they are not able to visit. The $5 billion comes on top of a previous $4.9 billion allocation of Provider Relief Funds to nursing homes made in May.

Hospitals must report data

The emergency regulations will also require hospitals and critical access hospitals to report daily important data critical to support the fight against COVID-19, including, but not limited to elements such as the number of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 positive patients, ICU beds occupied, and availability of essential supplies and equipment such as ventilators and PPE. These elements are essential for planning, monitoring, and resource allocation during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE). While many hospitals are voluntarily reporting this information now, not all are. The new rules make reporting a requirement of participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. This reporting is needed to support broader surveillance of COVID-19.

In March, Vice President Mike Pence sent a letter to all hospitals requesting that they provide the results of COVID-19 tests performed in their in-house laboratories to help better understand and track disease patterns. CMS’ new rules require such reporting of test results in order to ensure a more complete picture in the nationwide surveillance of COVID-19, as well as a more efficient allocation of PPE and other vital supplies. Hospitals will face possible termination of Medicare and Medicaid payment if unable to correct reporting deficiencies.

New reporting requirements for labs

CMS’ new rule implements a CARES Act requirement that laboratories report COVID-19 test results daily to the HHS Secretary. All laboratories conducting COVID-19 testing and reporting patient-specific results – including hospital labs, nursing homes, and other facilities conducting testing for COVID-19 – will be required to comply. If a laboratory does not report the required information, CMS will impose a civil monetary penalty in the amount of $1,000 a day for the first day, and $500 for each subsequent day. Labs will have a one-time, three-week grace period to begin reporting required test data. This requirement complements existing HHS guidance requiring laboratories to report test results and additional information, such as demographic data.

This change allows CMS to take enforcement action against laboratories that fail to provide the required data, which is needed by federal, state, and local officials to conduct effective surveillance of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Physician and pharmacist orders for tests

CMS is also revising its previous policy that covered repeated COVID-19 testing for Medicare beneficiaries without practitioner orders during the PHE. The revised policy specifies that each beneficiary may receive one COVID-19 test without the order of a physician or other health practitioner, but Medicare will require such an order for all further COVID-19 tests. This change helps ensure that beneficiaries receive appropriate medical attention if they need multiple tests. It is also designed to stop fraudsters from performing or billing for unnecessary tests.

To help ensure that beneficiaries have broad access to testing, CMS is also paying for tests when ordered by a pharmacist or other healthcare professional authorized under applicable state law to order diagnostic laboratory tests. Medicare makes payment for services of pharmacists and certain other healthcare professionals only when they have an arrangement with a physician or other billing practitioner. The changes being made allow Medicare to continue to pay for these tests during the PHE when they are ordered by pharmacists and other healthcare professionals without such an arrangement.

In addition to today’s announcement regarding testing and reporting, earlier this week, CMS released guidance for state Medicaid agencies on new flexibilities CMS has made available under emergency authorities to increase reimbursement for nursing facilities that implement specific infection control practices, such as designating a quarantine or isolation wing for COVID-19 patients. These can be temporary rate enhancements tailored to the specific needs of the state and community, and the guidance highlights case studies in states who have taken advantage of this flexibility.

Providers and stakeholders seeking assistance or more information on the interim final rule and the comment period should visit CMS’ Coronavirus Waivers & Flexibilities page for additional information, including fact sheets for changes for each provider type. More information can be found on the COVID-19 Emergency page: Coronavirus Waivers | CMS

To view the new rule, visit https://www.cms.gov/files/document/covid-ifc-3-8-25-20.pdf

Contact: CMS Media Relations: CMS Media Inquiries

Get CMS news at cms.gov/newsroom, sign up for CMS news via email and follow CMS on Twitter CMS Administrator @SeemaCMS and @CMSgov
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
112
Guests online
2,476
Total visitors
2,588

Forum statistics

Threads
632,774
Messages
18,631,634
Members
243,292
Latest member
suspicious sims
Back
Top