tresir2012
Former Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2019
- Messages
- 11,156
- Reaction score
- 56,469
I have posted it twice for you. BRB to do for the third time. Or perhaps you cannot see my posts so someone else will have to respond to it for you to see as that sometimes happens on the threads.
BRB with a third post... of the same information I have done..
ETA: Even post #138 on this thread
"Yes, we discussed a few days back on the thread.
The White House relied on a rapid test, but used it in a way it was not intended.
But one product they use, Abbott’s ID Now, was never intended for that purpose and is known to deliver incorrect results. In issuing an emergency use authorization, the Food and Drug Administration said the test was only to be used by a health care provider “within the first seven days of symptoms.”
The ID Now has several qualities in its favor: It’s portable, doesn’t need skilled technicians to operate and delivers results in 15 minutes. Used to evaluate someone with symptoms, the test can quickly and easily diagnose Covid-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus.
But in people who are infected but not yet showing symptoms, the test is much less accurate, missing as many as one in three cases.
I can see your posts. But I have missed a lot recently and have posted intermittently due to personal reasons so am still catching up. I think I remember this link so thanks for reposting to give me a refresher.
Is this the test that the WH use?
COVID-19 Update: FDA Authorizes First Diagnostic Test Where Results Can Be Read Directly From Testing Card
Taking COVID-19 Testing to a New Level | Abbott U.S.
I don't think this new one is the one shown in the article. I think that is the ID NOW test and here is a study.
Performance of Abbott ID Now COVID-19 Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Using Nasopharyngeal Swabs Transported in Viral Transport Media and Dry Nasal Swabs in a New York City Academic Institution
Last edited: