- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 9,752
- Reaction score
- 75,447
Bravo!!!!!! that housekeeping staff are at the top of the list and are recognized also for their exposures.
YES-- that is absolutely awesome and the way it should be!!!!!!
Bravo!!!!!! that housekeeping staff are at the top of the list and are recognized also for their exposures.
Why bother to give the FL residents any vaccines then? One vaccine at 52% efficacy is not going to stop the pandemic.
Some participants became infected in between taking the first and second doses, highlighting the need to get the second dose (efficacy after just the first dose was only 52%).
Pfizer vaccine final results: it's highly protective – but how long for?
This study found that the vaccine has to have an efficacy of at least 70% to prevent an epidemic and of at least 80% to largely extinguish an epidemic without any other measures (e.g., social distancing).
Vaccine Efficacy Needed for a COVID-19 Coronavirus Vaccine to Prevent or Stop an Epidemic as the Sole Intervention
DeSantis is playing with fire and people's lives: I can't imagine he will be allowed to make that decision.
Canada:
Scott Gottlieb, former Commissioner of the FDA, makes the same suggestion. Gottlieb's view is that there will be more supply of the vaccine in January and following, so why keep half of the currently available vaccine on the shelf now? Gottlieb's view is that we should "get as many shots in arms as possible." So his view is not that different from Governor DeSantis. And Gottlieb should be well-informed about how much vaccine that Pfizer will manufacture in January, since he sits on Pfizer's Board.
On COVID-19 vaccine, ‘get as many shots in arms as possible, right away’: ex-FDA chief Q&A | American Enterprise Institute - AEI
I don’t understand why these allocations cannot be spread as far as they will go immediately unless there is some issue with manufacturing we haven't heard about. If there is, we're screwed anyway. JMO
They did have manufacturing setbacks. And it is said that we can't mix and match the vaccines. As in, the first dose can't be Pfizer and the 2nd dose be Moderna.
So the first doses must be followed up with the (reserved) 2nd dose three weeks later ... in early January.
Plus Pfizer are supplying the US, the UK, and other countries. The designated allocations seem pretty firm at the moment.
The vaccine will be scarce at first. Pfizer had to scale back earlier estimates because of manufacturing setbacks, and has said it will be able to supply up to 25 million doses before the end of the year, and 100 million total vaccines by March.
Federal officials are initially holding back half of the supply so that they can give a booster shot to recipients three weeks after their first vaccination.
Covid-19: F.D.A. Clears Pfizer Vaccine and Millions of Doses Will Be Shipped Right Away
But a two-dose vaccine comes with supply-chain challenges and the possibility that not everyone will return to a doctor’s office for the critical second dose.
A double-dose vaccine would require twice as many vials, syringes, refrigerators, and clinic visits at a time when such resources are already limited.
Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine requires 2 shots given 3 weeks apart, which could make distribution more complicated
Why bother to give the FL residents any vaccines then? One vaccine at 52% efficacy is not going to stop the pandemic.
Iowa numbers and news for Mon. Dec. 14 and Tues. Dec. 15
Dec. 14: Iowa reports 665 new cases, 60 more deaths
UIHC ER nurse is first to get COVID-19 vaccine in eastern Iowa
State of Iowa to return $21 million in CARES Act used for IT expenses
Dec. 15: Iowa reports 1,338 new cases, 67 more deaths
Iowa using $10M in virus aid to fund state police officers
MercyOne Hospital receives first batch of COVID-19 vaccine
St. Luke’s receives first COVID-19 vaccine shipment
I want to throw up every time I read posts (on another site) from people praising his efforts to offer people the right to choose what is best for their families. How they don’t see his true agenda is beyond comprehension. MOO.Don't give him any ideas. And as DeSantis would say, "What pandemic?"
I want to throw up every time I read posts (on another site) from people praising his efforts to offer people the right to choose what is best for their families. How they don’t see his true agenda is beyond comprehension. MOO.
It’s a valid question that I’m sure has no real answer. Are we as a society better off giving twice as many people one dose of vaccine or half as many people two doses of vaccine when the supply is so incredibly low? Does it really even matter on a large scale in terms of virus spread considering how few vaccines we are starting with no matter how we roll it out?
I think it does have a real answer. You give 2 doses to people who need the maximum immunity, starting with healthcare workers. We cannot lose any more of them.
I'm not sure people realize that there are now hospitals all throughout the nation where no one else can be admitted to any kind of coronavirus care unit (regular or ICU) because there are no staffed beds. A bed alone is not enough.
The toll among respiratory techs, housekeeping staff, ambulance workers...has been immense. We need to protect those people first. This will save more lives because we need the doctors, nurses, LVN's, etc. to care for the sick.
People are sitting inside ambulances for up to 4 hours to be admitted in SoCal (not just one county, several). Ambulance workers should be vaccinated. These are COVID patients inside the ambulances.
Police and firemen have higher rates of COVID due to professional exposure.
Each place that has contact tracing has a clue about which workplaces and populations are more likely to get Covid (here in California, it's food packing plants, not just meat packing but also fruit, spices, etc). These people are essential workers so that the rest of us can eat.
By end of March, we should be able to vaccinate 100 million people. That will cover nearly all of those people. Then, the rest of us wait in line for our appointments. Since so many people are vaccine-hesitant, I don't think that's going to be a huge issue, either.
There's no point in wasting vaccine by giving half doses. One does is only "up to 50% effective." What good is that? After spending millions (billions?) to get a 95% effective vaccine approved...just seems patently ridiculous on the face of it to then use it against schedule and squander it.
Perhaps one day there will be a single shot dose, but there's a good chance it will remain like the shingles vaccine.
I think it does have a real answer. You give 2 doses to people who need the maximum immunity, starting with healthcare workers. We cannot lose any more of them.
I'm not sure people realize that there are now hospitals all throughout the nation where no one else can be admitted to any kind of coronavirus care unit (regular or ICU) because there are no staffed beds. A bed alone is not enough.
The toll among respiratory techs, housekeeping staff, ambulance workers...has been immense. We need to protect those people first. This will save more lives because we need the doctors, nurses, LVN's, etc. to care for the sick.
People are sitting inside ambulances for up to 4 hours to be admitted in SoCal (not just one county, several). Ambulance workers should be vaccinated. These are COVID patients inside the ambulances.
Police and firemen have higher rates of COVID due to professional exposure.
Each place that has contact tracing has a clue about which workplaces and populations are more likely to get Covid (here in California, it's food packing plants, not just meat packing but also fruit, spices, etc). These people are essential workers so that the rest of us can eat.
By end of March, we should be able to vaccinate 100 million people. That will cover nearly all of those people. Then, the rest of us wait in line for our appointments. Since so many people are vaccine-hesitant, I don't think that's going to be a huge issue, either.
There's no point in wasting vaccine by giving half doses. One does is only "up to 50% effective." What good is that? After spending millions (billions?) to get a 95% effective vaccine approved...just seems patently ridiculous on the face of it to then use it against schedule and squander it.
Perhaps one day there will be a single shot dose, but there's a good chance it will remain like the shingles vaccine.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.