CT - Dominick Krankall, 6, burned in bully attack, family says, Apr 2022

  • #21
  • #22
  • #23
LE says there is no wrong doing in this case. Interesting read.

Wow. Who was supposed to be supervising the kids, and are they the same person who owned the gas can and lighter used by the kids?
 
  • #24
 
  • #25
Wow, I was NOT expecting that.
I still hope that little dude has a speedy recovery. Some sort of investigation needs to go into this. JMO
 
  • #26
reading between the lines this seems like drama between neighbors and unsupervised children.
 
  • #27
And $500k 🤬🤬🤬 dollars for a "bullied" kid who was "targeted"
 
  • #28
  • #29
This is terrible, but don't take it out on the kids. I'd recommend that they use the 🤬🤬🤬 money to pay Dominick's uninsured medical bills, if he has them (he probably does) and give the rest back, unless it's held in trust for mental health therapy, which he definitely will need. I AM glad that he's healing well; no 6-year-old deserves to go through something like this.
 
  • #30
This is terrible, but don't take it out on the kids. I'd recommend that they use the money to pay Dominick's uninsured medical bills, if he has them (he probably does) and give the rest back, unless it's held in trust for mental health therapy, which he definitely will need. I AM glad that he's healing well; no 6-year-old deserves to go through something like this.
The money was spent on a new home for the Krankall
 
  • #31
Honestly both parents should be charged for neglect or reckless endangerment
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
139
Guests online
2,551
Total visitors
2,690

Forum statistics

Threads
632,136
Messages
18,622,614
Members
243,032
Latest member
beccabelle70
Back
Top