CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #62

[Eli9]

Did I just hear what I thought I heard from the defendant?

Yes, something about a group whats app chat with and entry about being naked now, and emoji and something else. Weird.

 

[marcom]

I can't repeat it. At the very end whats app from the defendant to FD.

We need to know the content - I missed it.

 

[Litig8r]

I can't repeat it. At the very end whats app from the defendant to FD.

MT to a “large WhatsApp group chat”: “Now I’m naked” with a winking face-tongue sticking out emoji.

 

[Cloudydiamond]

We need to know the content - I missed it.

" Now I'm naked, tongue out emoji". Group chat

 

[citygirl]

I was working, something about a naked picture and an emoji? And text? YT feed commenting without the content.

From the defendant to Fotis. Around 13:16.

 

[Aquarian]

MOO

Really difficult to keep up with today's testimony and I'm doing a remarkably poor job of it.

Perhaps there's a reason the State is racing through it.

Clark prepared the report.

Perhaps Reilly will return to the stand to conceptualize it.

Because it's really just a bunch of timestamps and geolocations right now.

I'm dreading cross.

MOO

You are doing a great job!

 

[afitzy]

Do we know this for a fact? Or is it just speculation?

The MT role in the entire situation was iirc detailed in the Family Court file and there were depositions taken from both sides iirc as well (some were sealed at the time too iirc). Your question is a bit vague imo. Fact according to whom? JF, FD or the Court? IMO I view the Court final order as a representation of what was FACT a/o the time of the JF murder.

I believe it factually correct to say that JF in Family Court stated that she believed MT (and her daughter) for reasons which she elaborated on in depositions was someone that she did not want to have access to her 5 children. Fact according to FD was that he didn't agree with JF on the issue of MT and her daughter not having contact with the 5 Dulos children. Fact according to the Court after reviewing the matter was that the No Contact Order for MT and her daughter was NEVER lifted and so remained in place at the time of the murder of JF. As of the date of JF murder the status of FD visitation was supervised, the GAL in place at the time Atty Meehan had been dismissed due I believe to misconduct following an in court investigation and no new GAL was appointed as JF was 'missing' and custody of the 5 children passed to JF mother, GF.

My SPECULATION based on commentary of Defence Counsel and 4 years of social media commentary from MT and the Troconis Crew about the idea that somehow FD was 'winning' in Family Court and MT would soon become the mother of 6 children is quite simply preposterous on the face. The alleged report that cannot be admitted as evidence in the MT trial was never completed in Family Court, the Dr was totally discredited as he refused to show up in Court to speak on the record with Judge Heller and Judge Heller closed the file on the matter by removing the draft report from the Family Court file. My PERSONAL OPINION is that MT, Defence Counsel and Troconis crew references to a discredited and unfinished report from Family Court quite simply represents disinformation as there is no aspect of any their many statements based on fact. My PERSONAL OPINION about any of the just mentioned parties using confidential documents to which they were not party and were not available to them as the Family Court documents were under seal cannot be printed here under TOS.

I still don't understand how Defence Counsel has even been able to talk about the discredited report in this trial and I don't understand either why Judge R hasn't banned its mention? The Family Court file was sealed long before Defence Counsel entered the scene and I'm not going to rehash the entire debacle of the dismissal of the corrupt GAL Atty Meehan again as that horse has been beaten to death. MT had no standing to view the report either as it was 'eyes only' to the parties and their counsel.

So imo it appears the Court sided with JF on the issue of No Contact of MT and her daughter with the 5 dulos children. If you want to call this speculation then feel free as its my interpretation of a Court Order. But, I believe a final Order from a Family Court Judge represents a fact in this situation and as such speaks for itself on the matter.

Given everything in Family Court Dulos v Dulos is sealed now, if you are interested there were some articles that described some of the Family Court issues and there were the statements made by JF attorney on the record explaining exactly what the situation was in terms of the Court Orders in place at the time of the JF murder on the issues of custody etc. IF you are interested in the FD Family Court filings around the time of the murder I would refer you to the social media of the Troconis Crew who have been posting some of these sealed documents now for 4 years in a manner that I believe does not comply with Court Rules on the Family Court Documents for Dulos v Dulos.

My view has always been clear in that the Family Court ruling on the No Contact Order for MT and her daughter was always in place and even if FD petitioned for its removal, this never happened. We know from Court updates that this No Contact Order was not complied with on multiple occasions by FD and MT and as of the time of JF murder that MT and her daughter were not permitted contact with the 5 Dulos children. There was nothing in the record iirc to indicate that anything regarding MT and her daughter would be changing anytime soon but this I believe can be termed my SPECULATION.

This is my last post on this particular issue as this has all been rehashed many times in prior threads but I did want to summarise the 'facts' as I understood them to be at the time of the murder of JF.

MOO

 

[BUF]

MOO

Really difficult to keep up with today's testimony and I'm doing a remarkably poor job of it.

Perhaps there's a reason the State is racing through it.

Clark prepared the report.

Perhaps Reilly will return to the stand to conceptualize it.

Because it's really just a bunch of timestamps and geolocations right now.

I'm dreading cross.

MOO

You are doing a remarkable job @Megnut !! Can’t believe you have gotten all you have!

Thank you!!

 

[Baby baby Jane]

I can't repeat it. At the very end whats app from the defendant to FD.

You must repeat … we don’t know

 

[Cloudydiamond]

You must repeat … we don’t know

I repeated in this recent thread

 

[citygirl]

You must repeat … we don’t know

I can't bring myself to repeat it.

 

[Love Never Fails]

Now I'm "nak-ed," tongue out emoji
... group chat.

Um, can’t imagine any of that group being naked and liking it. Ugh..

 

[Megnut]

Communication events between FD and PG

11 events

2:12.18 instant message from PG
2:12.18 pride invoice paid
2:13 outgoing ok -- when are you coming to the office?
2:14.10 incoming "end of the day"
2:14.10 incoming 4:30
2:24 outgoing "ok -- make progress today?"
3:02 incoming "yes"
4:49 incoming phone call. 00 seconds. Unanswered

 

[BUF]

about -20:47 for that WhatsApp reference

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

 

[Eli9]

I can't bring myself to repeat it.

That's sweet. It's okay, it has been covered.

 

[lucegirl]

I just had a shiver like the Bubba video from Murdaugh trial. Jurors love phone pings just as much as DNA. You can’t cross examine a phone. And that video is the same as seats = hardware. B = Murder - the obvious choice. It’s getting really hard to distance the defendant from all this.

horrendous.

 

[Love Never Fails]

Yes, something about a group whats app chat with and entry about being naked now, and emoji and something else. Weird.

I always heard don’t put anything out there that you don’t want people to see or read. I never do. But people still amaze me with their ignorance. I’m guessing MT feels embarrassed right now.

 

[Megnut]

Analyzed FD's second phone
Location data for 5/29
344 data points

Much location data deleted

Witness can't determine the reason for the deletion.

Witness analyzed data from about 2:40. 5/29

FD's second phone

2:41 pm

 

[afitzy]

Does anyone know if Andreas
Is a relative of Fotis or friend from Greece?

Friend

 

[nodamselindistress]

I always heard don’t put anything out there that you don’t want people to see or read. I never do. But people still amaze me with their ignorance. I’m guessing MT feels embarrassed right now.

I don't know about that, for some reason I get the impression that MT sees herself as some kind of sex siren that men can't resist.